1daydough.com - Cameron Dunlap - Specialty Communications, Inc - CameronDirect.com real estate program/course, refusal to refund 8805 Rt. 415, Campbell New York

Her original complaint was, she did not receive anything. Just send her a program.  (Apparently the refund period has past by now).  Even if it's giving the benefit of the doubt, the company will not suffer such a great loss.

  I recently attended an investor club meeting in Culver City, California where Cameron Dunlap was the speaker and then went on to sell access to his funding sources as well as information. All for a $1,000 deposit, which apparently gets you his educaional package and eventually your $1,000 deposit utilized as part of the initial fees on your first loan deal. Apparently leaving you without having incurred any cost at all for his educational materials and access to reliable funding source. I was not one of the twenty indiviuals who decided to pay the $1,000 for the promises, but I find it curious that if the offer is in fact genuine, it would seem a no brainer for Mr. Dunlap to refund $1000 to this or any unsatisfied customer, at once. Especially if, as he commented that evening and is written on his web sites, he makes his money on the loans they provide. Comparatively speaking it's a minor cost even if the customer never returned anything at all; the actual cost of those materials is miniscule. I hope I'm making my point clearly. I personally enjoyed his presentation very much and found attending worthwhile. If for no other reason than to hear a polished speaker that understands how to connect with his audience.                                        

 Thank you for providing this forum. You provide a very much needed service in todays viral age.

The problem here is that the customer DID receive the program at the event. The customer DID initial their order form to acknowledge receipt of the product.

We had more than enough product on site, and in fact we took unsold programs back with us. Everyone who bought the program received it at the event.

The refund was denied by Jeff's office because the customer would not / did not return the program.

Plus, even if I wanted to grant the refund, I can't. The transaction was run by the promoter - Jeff. Not me or my company. My hands are tied.

How is it right or meaningful when someone claims a "rip-off" when they refuse to return the program? Kind of marginalizes this forum, doesn't it?

Cameron Dunlap