- Report: #705683
Complaint Review: labs4rescue
| labs4rescue P.O. Box 955.
Killington, Connecticut United States of America |
|
labs4rescue After trying to negotiate a fee for a lab rescue for a dog named Dakota from labs4rescue, CT I was insulted and accused of being a "dog killer" because I thought the fee was high, given the average ti Killington, Connecticut
*Consumer Comment: labs4rescue
*Author of original report: Free Dog?
*General Comment: understanding rescue costs
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
I also think the fees are discriminatory, in that they are egregiously high and most low-income people cannot afford the fee, as they call it, and absorb the cost of medical care. Some will disagree with this, but the fee puts the adoption out of reach for many low-income families that would be great care-givers to these pets. Rescues should not only be for the higher-income folks, as it unfair not only to society, but the dogs.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/14/2011 07:01 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/labs4rescue/Killington-Connecticut-06419/labs4rescue-After-trying-to-negotiate-a-fee-for-a-lab-rescue-for-a-dog-named-Dakota-from-705683. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on labs4rescue
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Consumer Comment
labs4rescue
AUTHOR: Susan Olivier - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, September 18, 2012
It is very fair for the dogs!!!
The dogs health emotionally, medically and happiness is tantamount to high fees.
I have been through plenty of these rescues and frankly some of the dogs are worse off than before they got there and some get it right. But at the end of the day, even if one has to take less monies for the animal, the animals bests interests should trump anything else.
#3 General Comment
understanding rescue costs
AUTHOR: Carol - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, July 19, 2011
Gas is expensive. These dogs we rescue are not dropped on our doorstep. Sometimes we drive 300 miles to save a specific dog because there is no one closer willing to take it. That's 600 miles round trip and a full day of wear and tear on both body and vehicle. Rescues do not do "enough adoptions" to qualify for the free dog food programs. One large dog can eat 60 pounds of food a month. And while we wait for someone to want to adopt it, we pet it and walk it and socialize it and evaluate what kind of family would be best for it. We return lengthly long distance phone calls. We review applications and phone references. We pay for internet and a web sight and extra electricity. Often we have to drive 100 miles one way to put a dog onto transport to go to their new home in another state. If we are a rural rescue, we start that trip at 5 a.m. No one pays us $10 an hour for driving or petting or bathing or feeding or poop scooping.
Not all dogs come healthy. Most don't. We may get one already spayed and we put $50 into it, but the next we may put $2000 into only to determine no one will ever want it. So it stays with us for the rest of it's life. Rescues don't euthanize out of convenience. Only treminal to alleviate pain or irrepairable people aggression. We do without a lot of personal wants (and often times 'needs') so we can do for the dogs.
If you want free, their are plenty of ads. Just remember, nothing is free. That free dog, even if it is spayed and current, will still need health checked. And when you decide later on you "just don't have time for a dog" please don't call a rescue to take it. You see, they just might, and then YOU will never learn responsibility or understand how to earn respect.

