National Executive Marketing Associates a.k.a.THE NEMA GROUP) rip-off West Orange New Jersey

One of my employees spotted this nearly 5 year old "complaint" and showed it to me. What I am disappointed about, is that there was at least one response posted by me as well as one by Peter Kosarin , but those seem to have disappeared.

This "complaint" was resolved a long time ago, years ago in fact, but RipOffReport did not see fit to leave our rebuttal on line; only the original posting is available for all to see.

In all fairness, I think anyone researching my company on RipOffReport.com has the right to find either:
1. that if there was in fact a problem, that it was resolved and ALL pertinent communications are available for all to see, or
2. NOTHING remains posted

Thank you for at least allowing me to post this comment.

Sincerely,
Richard Heller

Sorry, d**k/Steven! If the concept of matter replication is "rediculous" (sic), then you had better marshal your considerable legal forces and bring them to bear on SBS Engineering! The erstwhile purveyors of such exotic technologies (they also are working on "Quantum Weapons Technology" but that's as much as they'll tell you. Ray guns, maybe?) list Eagle Rock Capital as one of their partners!

http://sbsengineering.com/Partners
/partners.html BUSTED! BAM! Ooooooh! Eagle Rock Capital and NEMA both share the same address/maildrop. Amazing!

Still not convinced? Here's a quote from the SBS Engineering press release archives:
"Richard 'd**k' Heller, Chairman of Eagle Rock Capital (ERC), a long time SBS partner... expressed high interest in funding DMC [Dynamic Molecular Configuration} research. 'We have been involved with SBS for sometime and they have some very interesting technology but nothing in their intellectual portfolio compares to what DMC presents.', said Heller."

http://sbsengineering.com/
Company/Press_Room/Press_Archives
/PA6/Featured_Article/feat
ured_article.html)
Care to retract your bullshit statement on this website, Mr. Heller? Hmmmm? You're very quiet - how about a little tap from the Hammer? BLAM! Oooooh! d**k has a partner in his Star Trek funding, a Steven Heller CEO of the Baldwin Group. Could this be the same Steve who rebutted? Maybe, maybe not! Maybe they're related! Please tell us!

Well, Richard from West Orange, NJ, although I am not exactly sure who Eddie in Saddle Brook, NJ is - I am assuming you were trying to address my response.

I am pretty sure by now many readers have already realized your spelling aptitude (or rather lack of thereof), but thank you for letting us know anyway! As to your "rebuttal": my answer is pretty simple: NO, YOU READ MY RESPONSE - the ball is most definitely in your court. As soon as I get my money back I will update my Rip-off report.

To Eddie in Saddle Brook, NJ:

Read our response, it states the ball is in your court.

P.S. Spelling has never been my forte.

Fraud-Hammer,

You were present and know perfectly well that I personally made the issue of matter replication a non-issue, because the concept is simply rediculous. You also signed a non-disclosure and have made a point of posting us anywhere on the web that will accept your credit card and moronic conclusions. You are also clearly aware that we never had any intention of even considering funding of this star trek fantasy. Get off our back before you really annoy me and I sue you Joe.
erchammer(the real deal)Steve west orange

Joe, get a life. Your rebuttal is insanity. FYI, NEMA has never been a member of the BBB or given them any $$$$. The BBB is an excellent worthwhile organization and is known to be fair and sincere. Your self righteous answer to our rebuttal is asinine.

We are interested in the technology you mention in your second paragraph as we do not think such a thing exists. Please introduce us to the person you seem to be a friend of who finances these types of transactions. As you use an assumed name, we conclude that you are involved with a person or organization involved in matter replication.

Sincerely,

Richard, West Orange, NJ

I would like to make it as clear as possible: I shall gladly withdraw/update my original Rip-off report when the $2500 REFUNDABLE deposit is refunded. As to the claims and specific accusations in NEMA's rebuttal - these are absurd and laughable at best. Unfortunately, it is not a laughing matter for someone who has been ripped-off and had a difficult time receiving any attention from NEMA until your report was published.

By the way, I decided not to comment on grammar and use of English language in NEMAs rebuttal and will leave the judgment to the reader, but in my humble opinion having one out of each ten words misspelled is not reassuring for anyone contemplating NEMA's services.

As opposed to some of the false statements and allegations made in NEMAs rebuttal:

1) I NEVER SIGNED ANY NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT WITH NEMA: the only NDA I signed was with Eagle Rock Capital.

2) As I was NEVER GIVEN ANY INFORMATION whatsoever from Eagle Rock Capital I obviously was not able to disclose any confidential information either.

3) My original report ONLY included facts. The only names listed were those of NEMA officials, which are public domain.

4) If NEMA officials are concerned with their service fee payment structure being disclosed in the report, well, this is not confidential information either as it has been in public domain for quite some time please see: http://execcareer.esmartweb.com/emailNEMA.htm

In conclusion: this is NOT a contract dispute! Its rather an attempt of a person who decided not to accept services from NEMA to get his refundable deposit back. Unfortunately, for some peculiar reason the only way to get NEMAs attention to such request seems to be your community services.

Hey, d**k! We could read those BBB reports if they weren't removed! POW! Didn't think anyone knew about that? Explain that! You can't? Too bad! More FRAUD HAMMER ACTION for you then! BLAM! Ouch!

Hey is this the same d**k Heller financing "matter replication and alteration"? Great idea! While you're at it, could you build us a warp drive? How about a time machine? Ha ha!

Better yet, build yourself a spell-checker! "Liableous" "existance" "flase" - tsk, tsk! Too bad for you that poor spellers get double the Hammer, for the same low price! BANG BANG! Oooooh!

Our cliuents are clients, not victims. Our client list is open to any qualified person. Eddie from Upper Sadle River is not our client as he reneged on a contract with NEMA.

We had been and still are willing to deal with this complainee in a professional way providing he eliminates the negative, false and liableous information which we see on your web site.

He also has broken a non-disclosure signed agreement of confidential information regarding NEMA. He has disclosed names of our clients, stated flase information and may be guilty of theft of services.

Your information on the BBB regarding NEMA is positive as there are no complaints listed. I strongly hope that reason prevails and we are removed from your site so as to avoid costly and lengthly legal action. You are involved in a simple contract dispute, one contract out of over thousands in existance,and are now an involved party responsible for any damages we have incurred. Sincerely R Heller

Our cliuents are clients, not victims. Our client list is open to any qualified person. Eddie from Upper Sadle River is not our client as he reneged on a contract with NEMA.

We had been and still are willing to deal with this complainee in a professional way providing he eliminates the negative, false and liableous information which we see on your web site.

He also has broken a non-disclosure signed agreement of confidential information regarding NEMA. He has disclosed names of our clients, stated flase information and may be guilty of theft of services.

Your information on the BBB regarding NEMA is positive as there are no complaints listed. I strongly hope that reason prevails and we are removed from your site so as to avoid costly and lengthly legal action. You are involved in a simple contract dispute, one contract out of over thousands in existance,and are now an involved party responsible for any damages we have incurred. Sincerely R Heller

Our cliuents are clients, not victims. Our client list is open to any qualified person. Eddie from Upper Sadle River is not our client as he reneged on a contract with NEMA.

We had been and still are willing to deal with this complainee in a professional way providing he eliminates the negative, false and liableous information which we see on your web site.

He also has broken a non-disclosure signed agreement of confidential information regarding NEMA. He has disclosed names of our clients, stated flase information and may be guilty of theft of services.

Your information on the BBB regarding NEMA is positive as there are no complaints listed. I strongly hope that reason prevails and we are removed from your site so as to avoid costly and lengthly legal action. You are involved in a simple contract dispute, one contract out of over thousands in existance,and are now an involved party responsible for any damages we have incurred. Sincerely R Heller