Corey Weiser Weiser character not worthy of a financial planner orlando Florida

Ripoff Report strongly believes in the First Amendment, even when it is about us.  We also applaud people for updating their posts if and when they deem appropriate to do so.  Nevertheless, the author of Comment #1 has suggested that Ripoff Report has "admit to hav[ing] posted a review against the wrong person and company" and that is factually incorrect.  As such, it is important for Ripoff Report to provide our side of the story.  Ripoff Report has made no such admission.  The User has purported to have made a mistake ... but that doesn't mean that Ripoff Report knows that to be true or false.  Ripoff Report had no part in the creation of the content at issue to have firsthand knowledge whether or not the content was posted about "the wrong person and company" and it is unreasonable to suggest otherwise.

Users of Ripoff Report's website acknowledge its Terms of Service, twice, including checking a box that, in short language, and among other things, affirms that the post is "valid" and complies with our Terms of Service (which requires that the "the information is truthful and accurate").  Further it explains that submissions are final and cannot later be edited or removed.  This check box affirmation must be checked (it's not pre-checked) before the user presses the submit button. We expect our Users to get the information in their review correct prior to their submission. 

Indeed, if a User writes a Report, and they feel the need to later clarify or correct information, as identified in our Terms of Service and the check box, they can always file an Update to the Report to add such additional information, just as this User did here.  Nevertheless, whether a User maintains their position, adds more information to the story, or otherwise later retracts their position, Ripoff Report still has no firsthand knowledge about what version of a User's story is, if at all, accurate.

In conclusion, no, Ripoff Report did not "admit to hav[ing] posted a review against the wrong person and company."

If you've made it this far, thank you for allowing us the opportunity to share with you our side of the story on this one point.  As always, we encourage those who review content on our website to conduct their own due dilligence, reviewing information from multiple sources, before determining whether or not they wish to conduct business with any particular individual or entity.

~ LD1

I am the original author of the review left in March 2019 and corrected in February 2020 against Corey Weiser  owner of Weiser financial. After strong evidence and meeting with the recipient who contact me in regard to the review i posted , i can assure that i left the review against the wrong recipient. Not only  Mr Corey wesier does not look like the individual we had a bad experience with but the company he represents is also wrong. The recipent has been able to reach out to me as i posted a review on another site where it was easier to find me.

At this time , i want to apology to mr Corey Weiser and the harm i did to him and his  company. After contacted the property manager from the property where our bad experience occured, the review should have been posted against a Jason Weiser from the Bahamas who is involved in a property asset management . However , we would need to see the face of that individual to be sure we do not make the same mistake again. I have been trying to get my original review removed  to avoid hurting an innocent individual and his business but Ripoff report refused so far. I am just a bit frustrated with the situation as i really thought ripp off report goal was to protect freedom of speech and protect  author opinion also when they admit to have posted a review against the wrong person and company. As a gesture to the innocent person, i wanted to file this rebuttal in good faith .