Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1517035

Complaint Review: Enterprise Rent-A-Car - Henderson Nevada

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Tom — Las Vegas Nevada United States
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Enterprise Rent-A-Car 1050 W. Warmsprings Rd. Henderson, Nevada United States

Enterprise Rent-A-Car Charged me over $1000 for damages I did not owe based on the "walk away coverage" I purchased. Henderson Nevada

*Consumer Comment: It doesn't work that way

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

     I rented a car from Enterprise and purchased the "walk away coverage" for the car.  The car was stolen. I filed a police report immediately, contacted Enterprise, sent them a copy of the police report, and went on with my life.  Over a year later I get a bill for $1386 in damages. I called and was transferred to a claim representative. I was told that because the keys were stolen from a cabinet drawer that the coverage I purchased was void.

     I asked them to email me a copy of the contract. After I received it, I called the claim agent back, and I read part of the section of the contract they had highlighted and emphasized: A theft is presumed to have been committed by a person other than an authorized driver or a person aided or abetted by an authorized driver if the short-term lessee of the car: (a) Has possession of the ignition key furnished by the lessor OR ESTABLISHES THAT THE IGNITION KEY FURNISHED BY THE LESSOR WAS NOT IN THE CAR AT THE TIME OF THE THEFT. 

     I pointed out how the police report specifically mentions that the keys were missing from the cabinet drawer in my apartment where I keep my keys and that I had the ignition key attached to my house key so I had to use them to unlock my front door proving the keys were not in the car. 



She said that voids the coverage, so I asked where does it say that in the contract.  She said, "it says you need to have possession of the ignition keys," and I said, "OR establish they were not in the car at the time of the theft. OR in contracts means 'either of,'  so nowhere in the contract does it show that it should be void."  She hung up on me. 

     I called back, gave my claim number, was put on hold and the call disconnected after several minutes.  I called back over a dozen times for over a week and no one would speak with me.  I emailed the claim agent who had sent me a copy of the contract. He replied, "we believe you owe this amount and are reporting it to the credit bureaus."  And they did, which caused my home loan application and car loan applications to both be denied.  

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/20/2022 08:48 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/report/enterprise-rentacar/henderson-nevada-charged-i-1517035. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#1 Consumer Comment

It doesn't work that way

AUTHOR: Robert - (United States)

POSTED: Tuesday, March 22, 2022

You are trying to treat the "OR" in a way that is not the intention. That is like saying "If it rains OR is sunny then you are not responsible for damage". If it was a rainy day you can't say well it says "Or sunny so I am not liable".

You left out a few key details of this "theft", such as how exactly this person was able to get the keys and how do you know this person.

If the keys were in a cabinet in your apartment, how was this person able to get into your apartment and get to the cabinet? You would have had to have been in the apartment.  So either this person was brazen enough to rob you inside your apartment, you left the door wide open and this person just got lucky figuring out where the key was, or you knew the person.

They are likely thinking that you enabled the person to get the key through either intention or negligence, which would make the insurance void.

Did they catch the person?
Did you go forward with having the person charged?
Were other things taken?

If they caught the person and you refused to prosecute they could feel that you knew the person.  If the car was the only thing taken it lends to their idea that you were negligent.  

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now