Imbrie Law Firm Attorney hired to do a divorce that put me in a financial hardship due to failure of providing the statute of limitations contract expiration date. Bryan Texas

Hired an attoney back in 11-2006 to do a divorce case. In 2007 my ex-husband offered me $300, I informed him he owed more (24,000). 

There were errors in communication with the attorney, no referral resource to provide to client (example, using a divorce mediation, and allowing her to review the agreement, between me and my ex-husband) due to an adoption case was being worked on, which caused a neglect in the divorce case and put me in financial hardship. Later, I found out that the statute of limitations contract date was not addressed in writing, which did not allow me to amend my case within a time manner. When I attempted an appointment, one was made, and cancelled at confirmation time, this happen over and over. I can see why the statute of limitation was not addressed, and I paid for service render. This has been going on since 2009.

I went to another attorney, who advised me that the statute of limitation time period is two up to four years. Later, I found out that a contract can also be given a different time period. 

This information I learned later and it is hard to get assistance. I've been advised to do a legal malpractice and this cose can range from $4500 to $5500, and this is costly. Why should I have to pay in this range when the statute of limitation was not address, the gathering of information was complacent and we depend on these attorneys to have the legal knowledge, that's why we hire them.