Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1521859

Complaint Review: SAN FRANCISCO ARTS COMMISSION - SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: M. — SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA United States
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • SAN FRANCISCO ARTS COMMISSION 401 VAN NESS SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA United States

SAN FRANCISCO ARTS COMMISSION BARBARA MUMBY BARBARA MUMBY GRANTS HERSEL $20,000 FOR PERSONAL VACATION SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Press Release – Ethics Commission Fines Former Arts Commission Community Investments Director Barbara Mumby $20,000 for Violating Ethics Laws

May 13, 2022

For information:  Michael Canning (415) 252-3100.

Ethics Commission Fines Former Arts Commission Community Investments Director Barbara Mumby $20,000 for Violating Ethics Laws.

At its monthly public meeting Friday, the San Francisco Ethics Commission unanimously approved a stipulated agreement fining Barbara Mumby, former Director of Community Investments at the San Francisco Arts Commission, $20,000 for four counts of violating City ethics laws.

In the proposed Stipulation, Decision, and Order adopted by the Commission, Mumby acknowledged responsibility and agreed to pay a monetary penalty for receiving a gift from a source doing business with her department, failing to file public disclosures of her personal financial interests, improperly providing selective assistance to a person competing for a City contract, and furnishing fraudulent evidence and failing to cooperate with an investigation.

As authorized by the City Charter, the resolution of violations through a public stipulated agreement enables Respondents and the Ethics Commission to resolve enforcement matters without the need for a hearing on the merits. The Commission is authorized to assess a monetary penalty of up to $5,000 or three times the amount of the amount improperly received, expended, or reported for each violation.

Commission Chair Yvonne Lee highlighted the severity of Mumby’s actions and noted the variety of laws under the Ethics Commission’s jurisdiction that were violated. Chair Lee commended Ethics Commission Investigators for securing the maximum penalty amount for each count of a violation.

As detailed in the settlement agreement, In the Matter of Barbara Mumby (SFEC Case No. 1920-051), while Community Investments Director in 2018, Mumby authored the majority of a friend’s grant proposal for an Individual Artist Commission (IAC) grant application. Mumby then took steps to advance that application through the screening process despite her personal involvement in drafting the application and knowledge that the grantee did not meet the eligibility criteria.

As such, Mumby knowingly conferred a competitive advantage on a proposer who was competing for a City grant in violation of the City’s prohibition on selective assistance. In resolving this count, the Commission fined Mumby $5,000.

Mumby accepted reimbursements from the applicant that sought the IAC grant from the Arts Department to cover part of the costs of an August 2019 trip to Hawaii for herself, her dependent child, and others, including the grantee. For accepting a prohibited gift from a restricted source that was seeking to do business with her department, Mumby agreed to pay $5,000.

The Commission also fined Mumby $5,000 for failing to file required public disclosures of her reportable financial interests within 30 days of her resignation from City service in January 2020.

Lastly, the Commission fined Mumby $5,000 for making false statements to investigators, providing fraudulent documents to conceal her conduct that violated City law, and intentionally misrepresenting facts to the City Attorney’s office during their investigation. In so doing, Mumby violated the City’s requirement that City officials and employees cooperate and assist with an investigation.

#   #   #

The San Francisco Ethics Commission was created directly by the City’s voters with the passage of Proposition K in November 1993 and is responsible for the independent and impartial administration and enforcement of laws related to campaign finance, public financing of candidates, governmental ethics, conflicts of interests, and registration and reporting by lobbyists, campaign consultants, permit consultants, and major developers. 

Our mission is to practice and promote the highest standards of integrity in government. We achieve that by delivering impactful programs that promote fair, transparent, and accountable governmental decision making for the benefit of all San Franciscans.

Public service is a public trust, and our aim is to ensure that San Franciscans can have confidence that the operations of the City and County and the decisions made by its officials and employees are fair, just, and made without any regard to private or personal gain.

 

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/14/2022 08:11 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/report/san-francisco-arts-commission/california-barbara-mumby-1521859. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now