SHANETTA LITTLE Wrongfully detained and labeled Moroccan National a terrorist without evidence NEWARK NEW JERSEY

CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT 6TH PRECINCT BRIAN O'HARA PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF NEWARK CHRISTOPHER BROWN POLICEMAN OF THE NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT 6TH PRECINCT THEODORE N. STEPHENS II ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT CLARE CABIBBO FAIR LAWN MUNICIPAL COURT

Moorish American stumbles upon possible corruption of SHANETTA LITTLE when attempting to reclaim a parcel on his ancestral estate.

Who are the Moorish Americans?

A Moorish American man Jaleel Hu-El, mistakenly confused as HUBERT A JOHN a corporate fiction, was detained on June 17th, 2021 (Gregorian Calendar year) for false claims of “breaking and entering, terrorist threats, trespassing, and burglary.” The plaintiff, SHANETTA LITTLE, decided that since she could not get him to submit to her will through her alleged documentation of the property, she went to more drastic measures by calling the police. Jaleel, a resident of Lenapehoking (known as the State of New Jersey to US citizens) was released on June 21st, 2021 with all charges dropped due to no finding of her claim.

Since the beginning of United States history, Moors have been intertwined in most of the activities of the United States in the Morocco Empire. From the Delaware treaty, The United States of America Constitution to the Moroccan treaty of 1787 renewed in 1836, the Moors of North America have always been distinguished in the Laws of the land. Corporate policies such as Georgia’s code of laws have denationalized Moors and other nationals the United States were expanding throughout the 1800s on Moroccan soil. By using the “burden of proof ” method, a multitude of Moorish Americans started to be declassified and given misnomers to hide their oral traditions and other cultural practices of registry.

Diversity not Separatism

Moorish Americans have always faced this issue of “diversity” on the North American continent. One example of diversity in controversy is the Sundry Free Moors case of 1790 which occured one year after the Constitution of the United States of America was ratified. As time progressed, the citizens of the United States slowly diminished and confused the definition of colony, settler territories and States on the same North American landmass. Historians, persons of law, and people that have a personal interest in history know that just because one is standing on the same continent does not “legally speaking” place an individual in the same territory or “jurisdiction”.

Morocco has always been looked at in its imperial sense throughout the centuries because of the limited access to Morocco’s history in the public realm and the connotative reconstruction of the original name of North America, referred to in Arabic as, “Maghreb Al Aqsa” (The Most Extreme West) or (The Furthest place where the sun sets). Rarely do individuals pay attention to words like “Kingdom” or prepositions such as “of ” when one is identifying Morocco in its modern day terms located at Alkebulan (Africa); but just like the United States can occupy territories outside of mainland North America such as Guam, Puerto Rico and Samoa, Morocco still exist in its own right as well.

Issue on Ivy Street

As Moorish Americans begin to nationalize back into their national American 1st class status (without the United States). Food, clothing, and shelter is one of our objectives to reacquire and help make their transition from being a 4th class citizen (black/negro/hispanic/latino/indian/native american/US citizen) of “Civiliter Moortuus” to “In Full Life” (see Black’s Law dictionary: 4th addition). Every state has abandonment and reclamation statutes for its citizens to follow, but unfortunately there is a common assumption that most people believe that everyone they meet is a citizen of the United States. (refer to House Joint Resolution 1203), Do you comprehend how easy it is to confuse one’s status?

Jaleel Hu-El, of the Lenapehoking territory, a pre colonial territory that encompasses all of the State of New Jersey and some surrounding occupying states, was using his authority in his office as Consul-General of the Lenapehoking State (supported by article 4 section 4 of the Constitution for the United States of America), in the Al Moroccan Empire of reclaiming a sitting, unoccupied, vacant parcel in the New Jersey republic state for the benefit of residents of Lenapehoking, a Moorish American woman and her children.

During his investigation of ascertaining the owner of the property, Jaleel stumbled upon something else: a complex documentation filing that there existed a mortgage by NEIGHBORHOOD ASSISTANCE MORTGAGE CORPORATION (NAMC) and SHANETTA LITTLE, a “NON-CONSIDERATION” deed with FANNIE MAE a/k/a FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (alleged seller) AND MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC (attorney in fact), SHANETTA LITTLE (recipient/not recorded as a buyer) and another mortgage between SHANETTA LITTLE and BANK OF AMERICA which means this property was more “transferred” than “purchased” and an inconspicuous signature that can be in question for validation.  

“Who is SHANETTA LITTLE and why did she “receive” a property through a “non-consideration” deed.”

Shanetta Little, a Customer Service Process Sr. Specialist at Jaguar Land Rover North America, was deeded the property on November 9, 2020 which would make it strange for her to take a half a million dollar loan on February 18, 2021. Who is SHANETTA LITTLE and why did she “receive” a property through a “non-consideration” deed. (Non-consideration means that the property is being transferred via deed without money exchanging hands). FANNIE MAE represented by NINA SHAWL of MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE LLC received $230,00.00 for the transfer in November. So who paid Fannie Mae if SHANETTA LITTLE didn’t close on her mortgage with BANK OF AMERICA (BAC) AND NAMC until 3 months after she was deeded the house?

So let’s say that “somehow” there was a short term arrangement between SHANETTA LITTLE and FANNIE MAE. According to njparcels.com, the value of the house was $154,900 in 2019. SHANETTA LITTLE’s mortgage to Bank of American was a whooping $435,813, nearly half a million dollars!!! That would mean the loan to value against the house is an excess of 281%. Is it a common practice for financial institutions to engage in a loan that is more than the value of the asset? Hence, the transaction was made, if we subtract $230,000 (allege repayment to MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE LLC) from $435,813, the difference in this sale still leaves a whopping $205,813. So let’s ask ourselves these questions: where did the rest of the money go? How many service representatives do you know from East Orange, New Jersey, take out a mortgage in excess of $435,813.00? Why wait until June, four months after the mortgage was closed, to go back to the abandoned house? Or did she go back to the property to attempt to reclaim the abandoned house only after Jaleel gave her due process of law by notifying her and giving her an opportunity to debunk his claim?

The company, FANNIE MAE, was listed on the deed as the seller of the said property who was presented by MCCALLA RAYMER RAYMER LEIBERT LLC registered in the State of Georgia for $230,000 on November 9, 2020. How coincidental is it that “MCCALLA” in “MCCALLA RAYMER RAYMER LEIBERT LLC” is very similar to SHANETTA LITTLE’s alleged confidant, JOSEPH A. MCCALLUM JR, former city councilman of the territory where the house is located? Perhaps, this was part of a cover up.. A buyer, mortgage broker, and a seller all acting as separate entities to avoid the obvious illegal insider trading / double dipping. Perhaps, Jaleel was collateral damage in the unveiling of such an unfair transaction.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office: District of New Jersey released a news press story on October 20, 2020 about a Newark City council member JOSEPH A. MCCALLUM JR for scheming to obtain bribes and kickbacks; co-schemer admits wire fraud conspiracy. The story goes: MCCALLUM and his partner used interstate emails and phone calls to further the scheme and took significant steps to conceal these bribes and kickbacks. The article further shows that the bribes and kickbacks received and sought by McCallum through his partner varied but one significant claim was made “an attempt to obtain payments from a seller of property in the West Ward and a developer (alleged SHANETTA LITTLE) who was seeking to buy and develop property.” Those who do business know that “DBA” (Doing business as) names are essential to keep oneself private without liabilities in the corporate world.

Can it be that this actual property has more than meets the eye? Has selecting this parcel by Jaleel-Hu El, a Moorish American, opened up a bigger conspiracy of fraud? Stay tuned for more information as we continue to uncover more on this story.