Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #428442

Complaint Review: 411 Tax Relief, A Division Of 411 Web - Culver City California

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Tulare California
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • 411 Tax Relief, A Division Of 411 Web 10559 Jefferson Boulevard, Ste C Culver City, California U.S.A.

411 Tax Relief, A Division Of 411 Web Promised to help with getting my tax obligation reduced w/IRS but did not follow thru Culver City California

*UPDATE Employee: bad information given + late payments made = poor result

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

In August 2008, I received an email from this co. that they had a "proven record" of reducing income tax obligation owed to IRS. I contacted them, initially spoke to a Mr. Ian Williams who, after hearing my story, assured me that I qualified as "uncollectable" per IRS. I faxed my bank statements, unemployment benefit stubs and copies of my 2007 tax return. I was told to also include my credit card account number so they could collect a non-refundable "retainer" fee of $250.00 (which I did).

In Sept I was sent additional forms to complete and sign, one of which was a Service Agreement--showing amount of $3200 to be paid for their services. This Service Agreement also states that they agree to represent me in negotiating with the IRS to have my tax obligation reduced. This, they did not do. When I finally stopped the auto charges to my credit card, a Precious Blakeney began to call me constantly. She gave me the name of Paul Cheesman to contact to get a status.After numerous messages, he finally returned my call in December 2008. He told me that he was unable to find my file, and I had to fax all of the information to him that I had previously faxed in August, which I did.

I finally received a response from him in Jan 2009 at which time he basically told me they could not help me. I have paid over $2000 to them and will not pay anything more because they didn't even contact the IRS on my behalf so I feel that they have not provided the service that they agreed to in August 2008. I hope other people can learn from this that this company is nothing but a scam.

Marjory
Tulare, California
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 02/25/2009 03:16 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/411-tax-relief-a-division-of-411-web/culver-city-california-90232/411-tax-relief-a-division-of-411-web-promised-to-help-with-getting-my-tax-obligation-redu-428442. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#1 UPDATE Employee

bad information given + late payments made = poor result

AUTHOR: Steve - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, March 05, 2009

Margie signed up with our firm 8/26/2007, and she promised our firm a series of low dollar payments over a nine-month period in exchange for our work on her tax problems.

For the record: A) we did not collect any money or receive any financial documents from her until AFTER we had a signed Service Agreement from her. B) Our Service Agreement says in black and white that "the services listed are our best initial estimate of the work required..." and that the firm may substitute "...additional services to get the best possible result". C) we work with many low income clients, because we offer reasonable payment plans for our services. However, as we advised Margie in the beginning, we will not work on a case where the payments to us are not being made timely.

Here are the problems that developed:

1) She did not tell us about all her income during the intial interview. In addition to the unemployment income she disclosed to us, she also receives about $34,000 per year in alimony. Without knowing about this extra income, we assumed that she would be eligible for either an Offer in Compromise or a Part Pay Installment Agreement with the IRS. Once this additional income was discovered, and we analyzed her "ability to pay", we discovered that she could pay $1,355 per month on an IRS debt of about $10,000. This is definitely NOT an Offer case. Nonetheless, we continued to work with her to get the best possible resolution given her individual circumstances.

2) She was told up front that she must remain current with her payments to us, which we kept very low [based on her stated income] so that she could afford them. Work on her case was stopped and started time and again as she made her payments late. Had she not been late on her payments, she would never have heard from our Customer Service Department, and she could have spoken to her Enrolled Agent at any time. Our tax professionals are trained to refer all calls from suspended clients to our Customer Service Department.

3) Despite discussions with our staff about the importance of staying up-to-date with her current year IRS estimated tax payments, Margie was either unwilling or unable to make these payments, therefore there were problems setting up an IRS resolution for her.

In sum, had the client given us good information to start with, the initial estimate of services to be provided would NOT have included Offer In Compromise. In addition, had she made her payments to us timely and followed our advice, she would not be racking up a new tax liability every year, she would now be on an affordable payment plan, and she would now be working with us to reduce the amount of penalties assessed by the IRS.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now