Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #230696

Complaint Review: A- Service Specialist Services Specialist Service Specialist - Apple Valley California

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Victorville California
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • A- Service Specialist Services Specialist Service Specialist www.servicesspecialist.com Apple Valley, California U.S.A.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

We called this company to receive an estimate for repairing a leak with our washer. They came out for a $20 trip charge and said that if we decided to use their services, the trip fee would be deducted from our repair fees.

After showing up 4 hours late they assessed our machine and stated that we needed a replacement "switch". My husband authorized them to make the repairs after we were quoted a price of a whopping $185! We wrote a check for $165. We were then told that we needed to pay the entire $185. He then said nevermind and not to worry about the additional 20 bucks. Then before he left he asked for it, in cash.

He also offered to give us a warranty on the part for an additional charge. He mentioned there would be a discount if we paid it in cash. We declined and he agreed that it really wasn't necessary as our machine was in otherwise great condition.

We then forked over the $20 trip fee, in cash, and the repair guy put the money in his pocket and left! After I inspected the invoice I noticed that there was a "$185 flat fee" listed and no breakdown of a part charge or labor charge. Nor was there any detail on the part that was replaced. Just the word "switch".

This repair was done on a Monday. My check was cashed by them the next day and then on Wednesday my washer was leaking again. I immediately called them and was told someone would be out the following day. After waiting all day with no one showing up and no phone call I called back and was told it would be handled on Friday. This merry go round went on for the next couple of days. Promises of a technician coming out and then no call/no show. Finally on the following Monday after I called again, someone came out.

After assessing the machine, the same guy says there is nothing worng and he left. The machine worked for approximately 4 days after that and then what do you know, broken again. Only this time no leaking. The washer would fill up with water and just sit there with no cycling.

I called back again and was told by the receptionist, who in my opinion isn't qualified to diagnose anything, that this was a different problem and they would be glad to come out again for a $20 trip fee plus the repair charges. I then contacted several other repair shops only to be told that the new problem is in fact caused by the "switch" which was supposedly replaced. I was then told that the price for replacing a switch ranges anywhere from $45 to $100 including parts and labor.
All the shops said that we were greatly overcharged and that at the very least we should have received a 30 day warranty included in that price. They also mentioned that the initial leak was not caused by the switch and could not have been fixed by the switch replacement. They all said that we were charged for something that was not the problem and that it was deliberate.
They recommended that we call back to tell them the information we were given and demand that they come out free of charge and fix the "switch".

When I called back, the receptionist refused to help us. She simply stated that we agreed to pay the fee no matter how overpriced it was and that she doesn't have anything to do with what others charge or how they do business. She refused to listen to anything I had to say in regards to the problem. Only stating that if it's not leaking it's not the same problem and if we wanted their services we would have to pay again...period! I threatened to contact consumer affairs or the BBB and she laughed saying that they had a copy of an invoice signed by us so there was no point in pursuing it.
Overall, we agree with the other repair shops which stated they were unprofessional. The first problem is the $20 trip fee not being deducted, the request to pay for things in cash and the repair guy pocketing part of our fee. The horrible customer service of making appointments and not shpwing up with no call to cancel or reschedule. And finally, their assessment of the washer goes against the assessment of more than 3 other repair shops. Their unwillingness to stand behind their work and their willingness to put their professional integrity on the line to make a few bucks speaks volumes.
Now here we are out approximately $200 bucks, almost the price of a new washer, and still no working washing machine!!!!

Kim
Victorville, California
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/15/2007 02:33 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/a-service-specialist-services-specialist-service-specialist/apple-valley-california-92308/a-service-specialist-services-specialist-service-specialist-ripoff-dishonest-price-gouger-230696. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
4Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#4 Author of original report

A- Service Specialist Services Apple Valley, CA Dishonest Employee of Dishonest Company Files Rebuttal After 1 Year!

AUTHOR: Kemettra - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, November 29, 2007

Whoa! It's been one year since our unfortunate encounter with this company and it has been brought to my attention once again just how unscrupulous this company and more specific this "Sofia" person is. The rebuttal submitted by Sofia is full of falsehood and deliberate fabrication of the truth.

First of all, "Sofia" cannot possibly regret my dissatisfying experience as she contributed to it greatly. Her customer service was deplorable. She was curt, insincere, and above all dishonest.

Her rebuttal and recount of the happenings regarding this incident are not true. There was an initial service request made, the tech (her husband) arrived four hours late with no call from either him, or his receptionist/wife Sofia, to advise of his being late. After the assessment was made, our authorization was given to repair the machine immediately. This was done on the spot. There was no second call or trip as she mentioned. Also, the events went as I previously stated regarding the discrepancy of the $20 trip charge and the tech "pocketing " the cash before leaving my home.
Next, the receipt I received from the technician does not contain any of the wording that she mentioned. It only mentions the word switch and lists the total as $185.
Lastly, her version of the events surrounding my second repair request is erroneous as well. If one were to reference my initial report, you will see that I was detailed in giving approximate days of calls and communication with their office. Sofia states that "after some time" I called back requesting another repair. This did not occur in the time frame which Sofia would suggest, but rather within 48 hours of the original repair. She then also neglects to address my being given several appointments for this repair request, to which her technician never showed up. When the technician finally showed up, I was issued another estimate to which I declined to accept and the technician left my home without any harsh words being spoken by him or myself.

The "irate" conversation to which Sofia speaks of was another issue. I called the office to speak to the technician in order to get clarification on his second, most recent assessment of my washing machine. Sofia then refused to allow me to speak with him. I mentioned to her the opinions and estimates that I had received from several other repairmen regarding the first repair job that was handled by her company. I indicated that I was told by them that the price for the service was inflated by at least %50. Also, that the repair that was done was unnecessary and not the cause of my problem and that is why I continued to have issues with the machine. She then immediately became defensive, stating that she didn't care what I'd been told, and that we'd paid it, so it was too late to complain about it. I then threatened to file a complaint with the BBB or Consumer Affairs and she laughed in a haughty manner and said that it would be fruitless. By the way, this complaint would not have been deemed a "legal action" such as a small claims suit, as she mentioned, but rather a simple recourse of action that most consumers pursue after being wronged by a "state licensed organization". And to add, state licensing does not exempt one organization from accusations or findings of wrongdoing. Plenty of businesses have their licenses revoked or suspended due to inappropriate business practices. So, Sofia's point in mentioning their being licensed is irrelevant.

Sofia's rebuttal to my report against their organization, a year to the day later, full of untruths and misrepresentations speaks volumes as to the character of this woman and her company. Also, her inability to address all of the issues, having to resort to embellishing and using a selective memory process, highlights her lack of work ethic, organizational skills and poor communication skills.

To any potential customer, I highly recommend you avoid this company like the plague. There isn't very much competition from "licensed professionals" in this field, in the high desert, but it would serve you better to look elsewhere. They obviously know that they have somewhat of a monopoly in this area and are exploiting the consumers because of it.
To the organization and it's employees, I recommend you study and incorporate into your daily lives the ethic of reciprocity, a fundamental moral principle, simply meaning "treat others as you would like to be treated".

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Author of original report

A- Service Specialist Services Apple Valley, CA Dishonest Employee of Dishonest Company Files Rebuttal After 1 Year!

AUTHOR: Kemettra - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, November 29, 2007

Whoa! It's been one year since our unfortunate encounter with this company and it has been brought to my attention once again just how unscrupulous this company and more specific this "Sofia" person is. The rebuttal submitted by Sofia is full of falsehood and deliberate fabrication of the truth.

First of all, "Sofia" cannot possibly regret my dissatisfying experience as she contributed to it greatly. Her customer service was deplorable. She was curt, insincere, and above all dishonest.

Her rebuttal and recount of the happenings regarding this incident are not true. There was an initial service request made, the tech (her husband) arrived four hours late with no call from either him, or his receptionist/wife Sofia, to advise of his being late. After the assessment was made, our authorization was given to repair the machine immediately. This was done on the spot. There was no second call or trip as she mentioned. Also, the events went as I previously stated regarding the discrepancy of the $20 trip charge and the tech "pocketing " the cash before leaving my home.
Next, the receipt I received from the technician does not contain any of the wording that she mentioned. It only mentions the word switch and lists the total as $185.
Lastly, her version of the events surrounding my second repair request is erroneous as well. If one were to reference my initial report, you will see that I was detailed in giving approximate days of calls and communication with their office. Sofia states that "after some time" I called back requesting another repair. This did not occur in the time frame which Sofia would suggest, but rather within 48 hours of the original repair. She then also neglects to address my being given several appointments for this repair request, to which her technician never showed up. When the technician finally showed up, I was issued another estimate to which I declined to accept and the technician left my home without any harsh words being spoken by him or myself.

The "irate" conversation to which Sofia speaks of was another issue. I called the office to speak to the technician in order to get clarification on his second, most recent assessment of my washing machine. Sofia then refused to allow me to speak with him. I mentioned to her the opinions and estimates that I had received from several other repairmen regarding the first repair job that was handled by her company. I indicated that I was told by them that the price for the service was inflated by at least %50. Also, that the repair that was done was unnecessary and not the cause of my problem and that is why I continued to have issues with the machine. She then immediately became defensive, stating that she didn't care what I'd been told, and that we'd paid it, so it was too late to complain about it. I then threatened to file a complaint with the BBB or Consumer Affairs and she laughed in a haughty manner and said that it would be fruitless. By the way, this complaint would not have been deemed a "legal action" such as a small claims suit, as she mentioned, but rather a simple recourse of action that most consumers pursue after being wronged by a "state licensed organization". And to add, state licensing does not exempt one organization from accusations or findings of wrongdoing. Plenty of businesses have their licenses revoked or suspended due to inappropriate business practices. So, Sofia's point in mentioning their being licensed is irrelevant.

Sofia's rebuttal to my report against their organization, a year to the day later, full of untruths and misrepresentations speaks volumes as to the character of this woman and her company. Also, her inability to address all of the issues, having to resort to embellishing and using a selective memory process, highlights her lack of work ethic, organizational skills and poor communication skills.

To any potential customer, I highly recommend you avoid this company like the plague. There isn't very much competition from "licensed professionals" in this field, in the high desert, but it would serve you better to look elsewhere. They obviously know that they have somewhat of a monopoly in this area and are exploiting the consumers because of it.
To the organization and it's employees, I recommend you study and incorporate into your daily lives the ethic of reciprocity, a fundamental moral principle, simply meaning "treat others as you would like to be treated".

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Author of original report

A- Service Specialist Services Apple Valley, CA Dishonest Employee of Dishonest Company Files Rebuttal After 1 Year!

AUTHOR: Kemettra - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, November 29, 2007

Whoa! It's been one year since our unfortunate encounter with this company and it has been brought to my attention once again just how unscrupulous this company and more specific this "Sofia" person is. The rebuttal submitted by Sofia is full of falsehood and deliberate fabrication of the truth.

First of all, "Sofia" cannot possibly regret my dissatisfying experience as she contributed to it greatly. Her customer service was deplorable. She was curt, insincere, and above all dishonest.

Her rebuttal and recount of the happenings regarding this incident are not true. There was an initial service request made, the tech (her husband) arrived four hours late with no call from either him, or his receptionist/wife Sofia, to advise of his being late. After the assessment was made, our authorization was given to repair the machine immediately. This was done on the spot. There was no second call or trip as she mentioned. Also, the events went as I previously stated regarding the discrepancy of the $20 trip charge and the tech "pocketing " the cash before leaving my home.
Next, the receipt I received from the technician does not contain any of the wording that she mentioned. It only mentions the word switch and lists the total as $185.
Lastly, her version of the events surrounding my second repair request is erroneous as well. If one were to reference my initial report, you will see that I was detailed in giving approximate days of calls and communication with their office. Sofia states that "after some time" I called back requesting another repair. This did not occur in the time frame which Sofia would suggest, but rather within 48 hours of the original repair. She then also neglects to address my being given several appointments for this repair request, to which her technician never showed up. When the technician finally showed up, I was issued another estimate to which I declined to accept and the technician left my home without any harsh words being spoken by him or myself.

The "irate" conversation to which Sofia speaks of was another issue. I called the office to speak to the technician in order to get clarification on his second, most recent assessment of my washing machine. Sofia then refused to allow me to speak with him. I mentioned to her the opinions and estimates that I had received from several other repairmen regarding the first repair job that was handled by her company. I indicated that I was told by them that the price for the service was inflated by at least %50. Also, that the repair that was done was unnecessary and not the cause of my problem and that is why I continued to have issues with the machine. She then immediately became defensive, stating that she didn't care what I'd been told, and that we'd paid it, so it was too late to complain about it. I then threatened to file a complaint with the BBB or Consumer Affairs and she laughed in a haughty manner and said that it would be fruitless. By the way, this complaint would not have been deemed a "legal action" such as a small claims suit, as she mentioned, but rather a simple recourse of action that most consumers pursue after being wronged by a "state licensed organization". And to add, state licensing does not exempt one organization from accusations or findings of wrongdoing. Plenty of businesses have their licenses revoked or suspended due to inappropriate business practices. So, Sofia's point in mentioning their being licensed is irrelevant.

Sofia's rebuttal to my report against their organization, a year to the day later, full of untruths and misrepresentations speaks volumes as to the character of this woman and her company. Also, her inability to address all of the issues, having to resort to embellishing and using a selective memory process, highlights her lack of work ethic, organizational skills and poor communication skills.

To any potential customer, I highly recommend you avoid this company like the plague. There isn't very much competition from "licensed professionals" in this field, in the high desert, but it would serve you better to look elsewhere. They obviously know that they have somewhat of a monopoly in this area and are exploiting the consumers because of it.
To the organization and it's employees, I recommend you study and incorporate into your daily lives the ethic of reciprocity, a fundamental moral principle, simply meaning "treat others as you would like to be treated".

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 UPDATE Employee

"Pricing, Participation & Facts May Vary..." For Service & Recommendations: Call 1.800.321.8331

AUTHOR: Sofia - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, November 29, 2007

First and foremost, with regards to Kim of Victorville, I greatly regret her dissatisfying experience. The success of our company is valued one satisfied customer at a time! Please be advised; we are a state licensed organization providing appliance repair and installation services and have NOT received a legal paperwork regarding this complaint and don't anticipate in doing so.

We continue to receive several highlighting recommendations, to include third party: Service Magic (Internet Contracting Service) complimenting our overall professionalism, to include, timeliness, service, pricing and overall experience. For completed customer evaluation, please contact us at 1.800.321.8331 or Service Magic.com

With regards to Kim of Victorville, our records indicate we responded to "leaky washer" with a $20.00 trip charge. Upon our diagnosis of the washing maching, we issued an estimate of $185.00 to repair the leak, in which, the customer declined the and paid the $20.00 trip charge.

The customer then called us back at a later time authorizing the repair; replacing the water leveling switch; in which, I advised the balance would be a total $165.00 due, subtracting the initial $20.00 trip charge paid; in which she happily.

Upon repairing the washing maching (TEXT BOOK REPAIR: washing maching overfilling with water; replaced water level switch) and showing the proper performance and operation of the unit, the customer then appoved the repair by having paid he balance of $165.00 with a check and signed our invoice stating "customer is satisfied with the repair and the unit is in working condition".

After some passing of time, we then receive a second call from the above customer stating her washing is now filling up with water; but not going into any cycle. This is obviously a completely different complaint than from a leak (PER TEXT BOOK APPLIANCE REPAIRS).

In our attempt to keep the customer satisfied, upon our technician returning to the customer location to identify the secondary problem, it appears that the unit has a defective or broken door / safety switch.

We explained to the customer that the now defective broken door / safety switch is the cause of the "not cycling" complaint and that this may be due to continued closing or slamming of the washer door, and or normal wear and tear.

Upon our issuing a second estimate to replace the safety switch, which is a completely different problem and part, the customer became irrate, upset and do not want to pay for the second round of repairs needed. We then kindly informed the customer that we would NOT charge for the second trip out.

As with purchasing any product or service; "pricing and participation may vary".
I remain unsure of what was truly communicated between the customer and "other repairmen", in which, I can not and will not comment on "other repair shops comments, pricing and or recommendations", because I am not aware of or heard from any of them directly or indirectly (who ever they are).

We do appreciate the continued advertising and special thanks to all of our satisfied customers and support!!...


Respectfully,

A Honored Service Specialist Management Employee
"Call Us Today! 1-800-321-8331"



















Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now