Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #381298

Complaint Review: American Loss Mitigation Agency, (ALMA), American Loss Mitigation Consortium - Newport News Virginia

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Lemon Grove California
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • American Loss Mitigation Agency, (ALMA), American Loss Mitigation Consortium 12610 Patrick Henry Drive, Suite C Newport News, Virginia U.S.A.

American Loss Mitigation Agency, (ALMA), American Loss Mitigation Consortium TRICKED ME INTO SIGNING A FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT WITH MY LENDER BY SAYING THEY WOULD USE IT TO PERMANENTLY MODIFY MY LOAN PERMANENTLY. AFTER SPEAKING WITH MY LENDER, THEY SAID THEY NEVER AGREED TO SUCH A THING, AND THAT I DO NOT QUALIFY FOR THE LOAN MODIFICATON. Newport News Virginia

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Complaint Misdirected

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

In June of 2008, I hired American Loss Mitigation Agency (ALMA) to help negotiate with my mortgage company because I was facing foreclosure. The fee for this service is $1500 which is not paid up front but is paid through the program. I found out about them by searching online for "help with foreclosure". I filled out a survey and sales person or representative for ALMA contacted me. She explained the program and said I would have to qualify for the program. The program would like such, you would send in your mortgage payments to ALMA to show to show the lender that you can make your monthly payment. ALMA would negotiate on your behalf but no monies would be released until an agreement was reached by both the lender and me. This sounded good to me, so I submitted my applicated with general financial information. Days later, I was told that my application was approved. You could imagine the hope I felt that my home would be saved!

The sales person forwarded all of my information to an ALMA counselor named Barbara Chronister. She sent me an information packet that explained the program and asked that I would provide a detailed package of financial information. It took me about a week to prepare the package, but she in order to began negotiating with my lender she would need this information plus my 1st posting of $2696. Sounds ok so far, not much is going wrong except I don't really know this company, that is why I was a little leary about sending the 1st payment. Despite my doubts, I sent the first payment in June but ALMA changed locations and the check was sent back to me. "That should have been my 1st clue that this is a scam company". I resent the check to the correct address and my 1st payment (certified funds) was received on 7/7/08.

Now they have my money, I am obviously interested as to what negotations are taking place, so I began emailing and calling quite a bit. My counselor, Barbara Chronister rarely answered emails, and when I called the office she was hardly available or on vacation. After finally reaching her, she said the lender had agreed to a loan modification and that I would need to send in a payment of $3740 as a good faith payment. I asked her "shouldn't we receive the loan docs before sending in the payment" she said yes, and that one of us should recieve the documents before releasing any monies Carrington. She received the "loan documents" via email which she forwarded to me which turned out to not be loaa documents but a "forbearance agreement" that I refused to sign 3 times before with Carrington because I didn't want to be locked into a high payment and then after 6 months come up with a lump sum payment. Barbara said the lender would use this to permanently modify the loan and that all the lenders are doing it this way. We had several talks and emails before I signed anything. Despite my better judgement I listened to Barbara, signed the forebearance agreement and released the 1st payment end of July to Carrington. BIG MISTAKE!

Barbara said that Carrington would have the final loan docs before the end of August. Time began to go by and I began wondering where are the loans docs. I contaced Carrington myself and was advised that "I do not" qualify for a loan modification because my financials show that I cannot afford the payments and all of my other house bills. Now, this is what ALMA was supposed to find out before they advised me to send the Carrington any of my monies.

Now you could imagine how upset I am that I released my savings to the lender and for them to tell me that "they never agreed to a modification" as ALMA said. This through me for a loop! I would have never released any monies to them if they planned to foreclose anyway.

After I figured out that ALMA was scamming me, gave poor advice and put me in a worse situation than before, I sent them an unhappy email. They responded and tried to start covering their tracks.

This is when I began dealing with Christy Sasser, office manager, at ALMA who doesn't normally handle cases but was put in charge of mine after I expressed my unhappiness with Barbara's performance. My dealings with her was just as frustrating as she failed to respond to emails and phone calls in a timely manner too and she ignored some emails and phone calls to both me and my lender. NOW TELL ME HOW DO YOU NEGOTIATE FOR SOMEONE WHEN YOU ARE IGNORING THE LENDERS PHONE CALLS! SOUNDS LIKE A SCAM TO ME!!!

There was lots of frustration with this company. My only mistake was trusting them, but you know, you live and learn. My last response to Christy was that she can use my case in a training session of "how not to handle a case".

I would just advise anyone before hiring them to read this report 1st and know what to expect, delayed emails & phone calls, and poor service. You think that you are working with experts in dealing with lenders and foreclosures but that was not the case in my situation. I found out it wasn't necessary to hire an outside service (3rd party) to negotiate with the lender because the borrower (homeowner) can negotiate for themselves.

One thing I will say in ALMA's favor is that they did refund my $1500. Praise the Lord! I had also asked for the $7000+ that I had sent to the lender based on their misinformation but they denied it.

I know and they know that they did not handle my case well. Consumers beware lest you experience the 3 months of frustration that I did in dealing with this ALMA.

Dawn
Lemon Grove, California
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/14/2008 09:28 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/american-loss-mitigation-agency-alma-american-loss-mitigation-consortium/newport-news-virginia-23602/american-loss-mitigation-agency-alma-american-loss-mitigation-consortium-tricked-me-in-381298. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
0Consumer
1Employee/Owner

#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Complaint Misdirected

AUTHOR: Dan - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, March 04, 2010

Please allow this letter to serve as rebuttal that was originally posted in 2009.

 

This complaint should actually be filed under Carrington Mortgage Services. We understand her frustration and disappointment in her mortgage lender backing out of their agreement.

ALMA worked diligently on this client's behalf to achieve successful results. We were able to come to a conclusion on a "Forbearance (trial payments) to Mod" program with Carrington Mortgage. The way mortgage lenders would set this is up is by sending out a forbearance agreement for the homeowner to sign. The mortgage lender would advise the homeowner to begin making the trial payments on the forbearance program. The total forbearance payments would range from one to six payments. Once the required number of payments had been made to the mortgage lender a loan modification review would be required on some cases to ensure the homeowners financial situation had not changed. If not, then the modification would be put in place.  There have been several changes to the rules over the last year or two on various components to the modification process with lenders and/or government agencies. Depending on the time when the case was being processed by the lender would yield the requirements related to the actual guideline processes.

The above process was used by numerous mortgage lenders to set up these types of programs. ALMA had never experienced a problem with these programs until this problem occurred with Dawn and Carrington. We explained this to the client and refunded all monies received on her behalf with the exception of the money wired to Carrington Mortgage in compliance with the agreement the client signed. We explained to her that ALMA no longer had possession of those funds. She would have to contact Carrington in regards to retrieving the money from them. We also informed her that we would be willing to provide any supporting documentation she would need in pursuing action against Carrington. It is unfortunate, the kind of unethical activities that occur on the mortgage lenders' and servicers' end. This is precisely why our company is here, to protect homeowners' rights and ensure they receive the help they need in maintaining possession of their homes.

In the more recent months mortgage services have changed how Forbearance or Repay to Mod plans work. The agreements now contain language or specific dates as to when the modification will be put in place. We can only assume this is due to complaints similar to this clients situation. Even with the more specific agreements and promises from the mortgage lender and servicers side we are faced daily with having to stop their attempts to break the agreements they have made with homeowners.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now