X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now
Ripoff Report | Central parking syste Review - Denver, Colorado
Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #669497

Complaint Review: central parking systems - Denver Colorado

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Bob — Pueblo Colorado U.S.A.
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • central parking systems 500 16th Street Denver, Colorado United States of America

central parking systems EXPRESS PARK A DAY is shorter than it used to be apparently, Denver, Colorado

*Author of original report: 2 or 3 days, yes, but $56 NO

*Consumer Comment: DAILY maximum

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Click here now..
PARKING GARAGE ADVERTISES $14 DAILY/MAX

I parked in the parking garage at 500 16th St., which has a sign that says $14/daily MAX rather than the hotel which wanted $20/day (Hyatt Regency) to save a few bucks.

Parked at 16:24 hours on 12/6/2010  and left garage at 08:54 on 12/8, for a total time in the garage of LESS than 48 hours.

The non-attended garage required payment to get out, so I paid and am disputing it with the manager in Denver. 

The FEE was $56.00 for parking.  I'm sorry but this country boy still thinks "daily" is a 24 hour period of time.


This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 12/08/2010 03:35 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/central-parking-systems/denver-colorado-80202/central-parking-systems-express-park-a-day-is-shorter-than-it-used-to-be-apparently-denve-669497. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#2 Author of original report

2 or 3 days, yes, but $56 NO

AUTHOR: Bob - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, December 09, 2010

Dear Josh,
Thanks for your reply.  Agreed if the "daily" meant Calendar day, then 3x14 would indeed be $42, but the signage and the ticket itself said nothing about their definition of day.  It was $4/hr and $14/daily MAX.

Maybe I was naive, and I have been so in the past.

The hotel parking attendant told me personally "$20 a day" so that was my source.

Regardless, the manager has ignored my requests and I am going to dispute all but $28 of the charges with American Express.  They are a reasonable company to do business with IMHO and they allow disputes if you can justify the complaint, which I think I can.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Consumer Comment

DAILY maximum

AUTHOR: Josh - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Wednesday, December 08, 2010

I'm not sure how it came out to $56; it should have been $42.  However, "daily" generally means per calendar day, not "per 24 hour period."  If it's "per 24 hours," it will not be called "daily."  The parking ticket generally explains the rate structure.  In my experience, the vast majority of parking lots located in downtown areas count calendar days, whereas most airport parking lots charge per 24 hour period.  But in any case, you should have checked the signage once you parked, since many parking lots do not even allow overnight parking, or charge extra for it (this is probably the reason for the higher amount).

By the way, you still saved money.  The hotel's website indicates that it charges $24 per calendar day.  You would have paid $72 if you parked there.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.