Some say its darkest before the dawn, I dont know?

I was a little distressed to find out that Francis R Cole like his clients also has convictions for crimes yet found it necessary to try and pontificate in Judge Chatmans court room about me.  Lincoln Law School where Dianas criminal defense attorney  Guy Jinkeson works according to their website today also works with Francis Cole or Robert Cole as his criminal record indicates.  In addition yet another attorney who was counsel for Dianas brother Benny Rodriguez in Quesada vs. Rodriguez. On that particular case the original attorney was Frank Cole who recommended that Mr. Rodiguez use Greg T. whose lisence has since been in a "state of not liseced to practice law" I like the guy so I'm not going to knock him he had a little personal trouble and I wish him well.  Point being however, when that didnt work out Cole took over Rodriguezs case again and then passed it off to what is apparently his co-worker at present Jeffrey Janoff. That being said,  a series of concidents that every one knows everyone perhaps?  However,  the most interesting part of it all seems to be at this point besides the obvious hypocrisy, pecksniffery or what have you of Cole who has no room to talk about values as his are tainted with criminality. Furthermore, while investigating his process server James Troy Wilson Realtor Restricted, and friend of Edward Voit, a child molester and Wilson friend, it came to light that Wilson not only got Diana and Bennys loan papers if you will confiscated by The DA's office - regarding the M & R Contempory Solutions, project he was actively trying to recruit Rodriguez for, but per his ex-wifes report to police "had a robot in his bath tub that he was detaining." so he called his wife who had an RO against him to advise her of this and all other details,  so she telephoned the police whom Wilson then asked to assist him in detaining the robot until his batteries wore down."  Point being I think Diana taking advantage of a guy like this to do her bidding and Franks participation in it is over the top.  I was a DV victim and Cole sent "an abuser of women with several violations of his own RO to serve me a subpena? Never mind the fact I was under subpena from the DA's office for Voit at the time.  Since when do criminal defense attorneys do civil work? Cole admitted in the Quesada case that he couldnt handle a civil case to Rodriguez. That is the reason he referred Rodriguez to attorney Greg T., he wasnt eligible to practice law so Cole took back over and then the case went to Jeffrey Janoff. The DA on the Voit matter is also the DA on one of Coles criminal cases perhaps he didnt realize given the time that passed from the incident or Coles use of aka's Robert Owen Cole etc?  The most upsetting part however was at Rodriguezs sentencing when the DDA on that case said 'she didnt believe me about Cole and Melegrito, Rodriguez etc. What did she do with all the paper work I gave her? Anyway its conveinent to have everyone working with a working knowledge of the crimes and lack of discretion that was used in this case. Armando Venegas the attorney used to save the house before Troy Wilson came along with the M and R Contempory Solutions is also now suspended or dis barred as is Coles former business partner.  I hear Mr.  Jinkerson and Mr. Janoff are very good attorneys perhaps since they know all the parties involved they can help me litigate for damages against them all for personal injury, and fraud. Given all of Coles history and non sanctioned behaviors according to the bar rules, perjury and conflicts of interest x's 10 one might think that Lincoln Law School might want to consider Cole as a choice for there staff, but what do I know?

Section 679.02 relating to victims  and witnesses of crime are honored and protected by law enforcement agencies, prosecuttors and judges in a manner no less vigorous the the protections afforded criminal defendents!

after Francis Cole 219081 Should read a child molesters friend, or mutual friend of Diana and Troy Wilson the former SuCasa agent, who went M & R Contempory Solutions y until his office was raided by The Santa Clara County DA's office which caused loan documents to come into their possesion, after the owners arrest of that company, he moved on with his restricted real estate license to the Home Protection Group Diamond Bar CA which was the first clue that alerted me to Dianas lies filed in court in the UD case that Wilson delivered to me on Thanksgiving Day.

after Francis Cole State Bar 219081 should read James Troy Wilson a friend of Child molester electrician Ed Voit, whom worked on Dianas House and whom "Troy"  helped get a bogus stated loan for his property on Roan St. in San Jose, CA. Troy formerly a Su Casa real estate agent was soliciting Dianas brother for $ for M & R Contempory Solutions, and then the Home Protection Group of Diamond Bar CA a few days later.
The HPG is the company Diana used in her affadavit stamped with Selans notary stamp. They like M & R Contempory Solutions wanted upfront fees also only they needed 10 business days before a trustees sale was scheduled to "do their magic". Immeadiately upon seeing that name in Dianas affadavit I knew her affadavit to be false like everything else she is involved in "faulty".  I wonder why Wilson has a restricted Real Estate Lisence?  Congrats to you however, for getting Dianas loan documents into the Santa Clara County District Attorneys Office, when your office was raided by investigators way to go! Consequently the writing on that UD which was not Dianas brothers is going to have to be explained along with who ever filled out the fee waiver for it to be filed.  None the less Troy knows who gave him the papers, and while he might not want to talk about it I bet he will eventually,  I know I will be asking the DRE what Wilson was  doing serving bogus UD to tenents in a foreclosure, and victims of his rancid friends folly?  Its no mistake that Wilson knew just what he was doing at the request of Diana, after all he was the one trying to work her brother for a loan modication, after the house was foreclosed on. See ya at the DRE!

Victims Bill of Rights

Marsys Law significantly expands the rights of victims in California. Under Marsys Law, the California Constitution article I, 28, section (b) now provides victims with the following enumerated rights:

1. To be treated with fairness and respect for his or her privacy and dignity, and to be free from intimidation, harassment, and abuse, throughout the criminal or juvenile justice process.
   
2. To be reasonably protected from the defendant and persons acting on behalf of the defendant.
   
3. To have the safety of the victim and the victims family considered in fixing the amount of bail and release conditions for the defendant.
   
4. To prevent the disclosure of confidential information or records to the defendant, the defendants attorney, or any other person acting on behalf of the defendant, which could be used to locate or harass the victim or the victims family or which disclose confidential communications made in the course of medical or counseling treatment, or which are otherwise privileged or confidential by law.
   
5. To refuse an interview, deposition, or discovery request by the defendant, the defendants attorney, or any other person acting on behalf of the defendant, and to set reasonable conditions on the conduct of any such interview to which the victim consents.
   
6. To reasonable notice of and to reasonably confer with the prosecuting agency, upon request, regarding, the arrest of the defendant if known by the prosecutor, the charges filed, the determination whether to extradite the defendant, and, upon request, to be notified of and informed before any pretrial disposition of the case.
   
7. To reasonable notice of all public proceedings, including delinquency proceedings, upon request, at which the defendant and the prosecutor are entitled to be present and of all parole or other post-conviction release proceedings, and to be present at all such proceedings.
   
8. To be heard, upon request, at any proceeding, including any delinquency proceeding, involving a post-arrest release decision, plea, sentencing, post-conviction release decision, or any proceeding in which a right of the victim is at issue.
   
9. To a speedy trial and a prompt and final conclusion of the case and any related post-judgment proceedings.
   
10. To provide information to a probation department official conducting a pre-sentence investigation concerning the impact of the offense on the victim and the victims family and any sentencing recommendations before the sentencing of the defendant.
    
11. To receive, upon request, the pre-sentence report when available to the defendant, except for those portions made confidential by law.
    
12. To be informed, upon request, of the conviction, sentence, place and time of incarceration, or other disposition of the defendant, the scheduled release date of the defendant, and the release of or the escape by the defendant from custody.
    
13. To restitution.
    
    
    
    1. It is the unequivocal intention of the People of the State of California that all persons who suffer losses as a result of criminal activity shall have the right to seek and secure restitution from the persons convicted of the crimes causing the losses they suffer.
       
    2. Restitution shall be ordered from the convicted wrongdoer in every case, regardless of the sentence or disposition imposed, in which a crime victim suffers a loss.
       
    3. All monetary payments, monies, and property collected from any person who has been ordered to make restitution shall be first applied to pay the amounts ordered as restitution to the victim.
    
    
14. To the prompt return of property when no longer needed as evidence.
    
15. To be informed of all parole procedures, to participate in the parole process, to provide information to the parole authority to be considered before the parole of the offender, and to be notified, upon request, of the parole or other release of the offender.
    
16. To have the safety of the victim, the victims family, and the general public considered before any parole or other post-judgment release decision is made.
    
17. To be informed of the rights enumerated in paragraphs (1) through (16).