Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #321671

Complaint Review: Directv - Greenwood Village Colorado

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Staten Island New York
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Directv PO Box 6550 Greenwood Village, Colorado U.S.A.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

new HD satellites. This was the reason why I was getting so few HD channels and I have been a subscriber to Directv's high definition satellite TV service since 2004.My monthly service bill was paid through direct debit from my checking account and in the past year, was bundled with my Verizion home phone bill. Therefore, my payments were never late. And yet I have been placed in collations with Alliedinterstate.

IN 2007, Directv was advertising that they offered up to 80 HD channels (including premium channels). I noticed friends and relatives who recently subscribed were receiving more HD channels, excluding premium channels, than I was under the same program package as I had. At the time I was receiving between 4 and 6 HD channels.

IN 2007, Directv was advertising that they offered up to 80 HD channels (including premium channels). I noticed friends and relatives who recently subscribed were receiving more HD channels, excluding premium channels, than I was under the same program package as I had. At the time I was receiving between 4 and 6 HD channels.

During the year I was experiencing numerous service interruptions were the receiver would display a "searching for satellite signal" message. As it became more frequent in mid-December, I called customer service to advise them of the problem. I spent three days calling them, each call lasting four hours between being switched from department to department; person to person; supervisor after supervisor; menu prompt after menu prompt.

After all this, I was advised that my receiver was obsolete. It could not pick up Directv's new HD satellites. This was the reason why I was getting so few HD channels and experiencing signal loss. Directv was advertising free HD upgrades on TV. I even received a mail offer for a free HD upgrade. Since I was a customer in good standing for three years, I asked them for a free set top box receiver. I was told that their New HD receiver would not work with my TV and was advised to buy a new TV or live with the limited HD service.

I have a RCA 61 inch diagonal 1080i Hi definition projection TV with a built in Directv receiver that took me three years to pay off . This advice to buy another TV was ludicrous! I researched the various HD set top box receivers Directv is offering its' customers and found all of them would connect to my TV.

I called Directv sales and pretended to be a person that wanted to subscribe as a new customer. I told the sales person what type of TV I had. The salesperson checked with tech support and told me their set top box would work with no problem.

I called Directv customer service again. I explained to them that I found it unfair to pay for full HD service while only receiving limited channels with frequent service loss. I felt I had no choice but to cancel if they did not give me an upgrade. I was transferred to a customer retention representative. This person agreed to give me an upgrade but had to switch me to tech support to set it up. I was switched and went through the annoying prompts again. Again, the support person told me the new receiver would not work and to buy a new TV. I again asked for a supervisor, put on hold then disconnected. I called back and canceled effective the end of the billing cycle (December 29, 2007).

In January 2008, I received my final Directv bill bundled with my Verizion phone bill as usual. It was paid on time. A few weeks later I received a separate bill from Directv for $75 with no explanation for this charge. I called them for an explanation. I was told it was an early termination fee. I said how can I get this charge if I canceled after three years of service. I was advised by a person named Justin that I called them in July 2007, upgraded my service to HD and had canceled before my year was up. I responded that I had HD service since 2004 not just in 2007. I never called them in July. Furthermore, I felt that this fee was unjustified and requested that it be removed. Justin just repeated that I upgraded in 2007 and had to pay the fee.

Every two weeks since January, I have received a call harassing me to pay this $75 fee. I relate this story to each caller. But, each caller is unwilling to listen. They respond with someone" called them or received a call accepting a promotion to receive a discount for continuing service for another year. These callers can not tell me who they spoke to in July 2007.

In February 2008, I received a call from Lisa Holms with Directv requesting this fee be paid. I again explained the situation stating as far as I was concerned I fulfilled my contractual obligation in 2005. I never signed another contract with them after 2004. I never spoke to anyone or agreed to anything after 2004. I further told her I still would be with Directv if they would have provided me with one upgrade. Instead, I switched to Dish TV who provided me with four HD boxes including a HD DVR.

Lisa Holms agreed that the $75 charge was unjustified given the circumstances. Ms Holms said she would contact her billing disputes department and they would get back to me.

In March 2008, I started receiving phone calls on a daily basis from a collection agency called Allied Interstate threatening me that if I did not pay they would report the debt to the credit reporting agencies.

ON March 21, 2008 I called Chase Carey, president of Dirctv. I was connected to a Jamie employee #4165 who stated she was assistant to the president. Once again I explained the situation. She was extremely rude in her response to me and demanded payment.

As you can see I made numerous attempts to clear this up. This company deals in deceptive practices and black male.








IN 2007, Directv was advertising that they offered up to 80 HD channels (including premium channels). I noticed friends and relatives who recently subscribed were receiving more HD channels, excluding premium channels, than I was under the same program package as I had. At the time I was receiving between 4 and 6 HD channels.

During the year I was experiencing numerous service interruptions were the receiver would display a "searching for satellite signal" message. As it became more frequent in mid-December, I called customer service to advise them of the problem. I spent three days calling them, each call lasting four hours between being switched from department to department; person to person; supervisor after supervisor; menu prompt after menu prompt.

After all this, I was advised that my receiver was obsolete. It could not pick up Directv's experiencing signal loss. Directv was advertising free HD upgrades on TV. I even received a mail offer for a free HD upgrade. Since I was a customer in good standing for three years, I asked them for a free set top box receiver. I was told that their New HD receiver would not work with my TV and was advised to buy a new TV or live with the limited HD service.

I have a RCA 61 inch diagonal 1080i Hi definition projection TV with a built in Directv receiver that took me three years to pay off . This advice to buy another TV was ludicrous! I researched the various HD set top box receivers Directv is offering its' customers and found all of them would connect to my TV.

I called Directv sales and pretended to be a person that wanted to subscribe as a new customer. I told the sales person what type of TV I had. The salesperson checked with tech support and told me their set top box would work with no problem.

I called Directv customer service again. I explained to them that I found it unfair to pay for full HD service while only receiving limited channels with frequent service loss. I felt I had no choice but to cancel if they did not give me an upgrade. I was transferred to a customer retention representative. This person agreed to give me an upgrade but had to switch me to tech support to set it up. I was switched and went through the annoying prompts again. Again, the support person told me the new receiver would not work and to buy a new TV. I again asked for a supervisor, put on hold then disconnected. I called back and canceled effective the end of the billing cycle (December 29, 2007).

In January 2008, I received my final Directv bill bundled with my Verizion phone bill as usual. It was paid on time. A few weeks later I received a separate bill from Directv for $75 with no explanation for this charge. I called them for an explanation. I was told it was an early termination fee. I said how can I get this charge if I canceled after three years of service. I was advised by a person named Justin that I called them in July 2007, upgraded my service to HD and had canceled before my year was up. I responded that I had HD service since 2004 not just in 2007. I never called them in July. Furthermore, I felt that this fee was unjustified and requested that it be removed. Justin just repeated that I upgraded in 2007 and had to pay the fee.

Every two weeks since January, I have received a call harassing me to pay this $75 fee. I relate this story to each caller. But, each caller is unwilling to listen. They respond with someone" called them or received a call accepting a promotion to receive a discount for continuing service for another year. These callers can not tell me who they spoke to in July 2007.

In February 2008, I received a call from Lisa Holms with Directv requesting this fee be paid. I again explained the situation stating as far as I was concerned I fulfilled my contractual obligation in 2005. I never signed another contract with them after 2004. I never spoke to anyone or agreed to anything after 2004. I further told her I still would be with Directv if they would have provided me with one upgrade. Instead, I switched to Dish TV who provided me with four HD boxes including a HD DVR.

Lisa Holms agreed that the $75 charge was unjustified given the circumstances. Ms Holms said she would contact her billing disputes department and they would get back to me.

In March 2008, I started receiving phone calls on a daily basis from a collection agency called Allied Interstate threatening me that if I did not pay they would report the debt to the credit reporting agencies.

ON March 21, 2008 I called Chase Carey, president of Dirctv. I was connected to a Jamie employee #4165 who stated she was assistant to the president. Once again I explained the situation. She was extremely rude in her response to me and demanded payment.

As you can see I made numerous attempts to clear this up. This company deals in deceptive practices and black male.

Anthony
Staten Island, New York
U.S.A.

Click here to read other Rip Off Reports on DirectTV

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/27/2008 01:53 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/directv/greenwood-village-colorado-80155/directv-bogus-fees-and-lies-greenwood-village-colorado-321671. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
2Consumer
1Employee/Owner

#3 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Class Action Lawsuit

AUTHOR: Rosemary - (USA)

POSTED: Monday, March 01, 2010

Don't forget to also forward the info about your case to Sprenger Law Firm.  They have filed a class action lawsuit against DIRECTV for their shoddy and unlawful business practices.  There are cases pending in 6 states so far that I know about.  I also have been abused by DIRECTV.  The claim I owe them a $280 termination fee.  They took it unauthorized out of my checking account. I disputed it with my bank account but DIRECTV has sent me another bill.  I have filed a compliant with the California Attorney General.  This is still in dispute.  Hopefully it will get resolved soon.  I am still fighting!



Good luck with your case.  Get everything they tell you IN WRITING.  You cannot trust DIRECTVs word.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Author of original report

DIRECTV I WON, VIctory!!! (I think?)

AUTHOR: Anthony - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Monday, April 21, 2008

Today,4/21/08, I received a call from "WABC NY CALL FOR ACTION" representative Evelyn (one of the many TV/radio consumer action reporters I contacted).Evelyn told me that she spoke to a DTV CSR who told her that DTV reversed the $75 early cancellation fee on 4/4/08 and returned my account to a zero balance.

I find this interesting as DTV never notified me as to their decision to date. I called them myself afterwards and spoke to Debra employee 100253190. Debra confirmed the charge reversal and zero balance. She also confirmed that the collection proceedings with Allied Interstate should also be terminated.

I asked Debra why I was not notified of this action as this was supposedly done on 4/4/08. She replied that I would receive a bill with a'zero balance after its' cycle date (30th of the month).She seemed to be very apologetic for my inconvenience and would print an earlier notice and send it out to me.

I then called Allied Interstate Collection Agency. A Justin Deboer answered. He exclaimed " You won! How did you do it?" I replied, I used their tactics of being persistent. I sent registered letters to DTV and Allied Interstate disputing the $75 fee claim. I contacted by phone, by letter and by website; the New York State Attorney General; NYS Consumer Protection Board:The FCC;the FTC; BBB, Colorado; BBB, California; all the local metropolitan NY TV and radio consumer reporting groups: shale I go on?

Mr Deboer also confirmed I had a zero balance with his agency and no credit bureau was given any adverse info about me. I requested a written statement to confirm his statement. He refused to provide me with one.

This is why I say my victory is questionable. I await the DTV billing statement and responses from The various agencies I have contacted.

I would like to see something in writing considering the type of shady business practices and lies DIRECTV perpetrates.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Author of original report

UPDATE

AUTHOR: Anthony - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, March 28, 2008

I have been a subscriber to Directv's high definition satellite TV service since 2004. My monthly service bill was paid through direct debit from my checking account and in the past year, was bundled with my Verizion home phone bill. Therefore, my payments were never late. And yet I have been placed in collations with Alliedinterstate.

In 2007, Directv was advertising that they offered up to 80 HD channels (including premium channels). I noticed friends and relatives who recently subscribed were receiving more HD channels, excluding premium channels, than I was under the same program package as I had. At the time I was receiving between 4 and 6 HD channels.

During the year I was experiencing numerous service interruptions were the receiver would display a "searching for satellite signal" message. As it became more frequent in mid-December, I called customer service to advise them of the problem. I spent three days calling them, each call lasting four hours between being switched from department to department; person to person; supervisor after supervisor; menu prompt after menu prompt.

After all this, I was advised that my receiver was obsolete. It could not pick up Directv's new HD satellites. This was the reason why I was getting so few HD channels and experiencing signal loss. Directv was advertising free HD upgrades on TV. I even received a mail offer for a free HD upgrade. Since I was a customer in good standing for three years, I asked them for a free set top box receiver. I was told that their New HD receiver would not work with my TV and was advised to buy a new TV or live with the limited HD service.

I have a RCA 61 inch diagonal 1080i Hi definition projection TV with a built in Directv receiver that took me three years to pay off. This advice to buy another TV was ludicrous! I researched the various HD set top box receivers Directv was offering its' customers and found all of them would connect to my TV.

I called Directv sales and pretended to be a person that wanted to subscribe as a new customer. I told the sales person what type of TV I had. The salesperson checked with tech support and told me their set top box would work with no problem.

I called Directv customer service again. I explained to them that I found it unfair to pay for full HD service while only receiving limited channels with frequent service loss. I felt I had no choice but to cancel if they did not give me an upgrade. I was transferred to a customer retention representative. This person agreed to give me an upgrade but had to switch me to tech support to set it up. I was switched and went through the annoying prompts again. Again, the support person told me the new receiver would not work and to buy a new TV. I again asked for a supervisor, put on hold then disconnected. I called back and canceled effective the end of the billing cycle (December 29, 2007).

In January 2008, I received my final Directv bill bundled with my Verizion phone bill as usual. It was paid on time. A few weeks later I received a separate bill from Directv for $75 with no explanation for this charge. I called them for an explanation. I was told it was an early termination fee. I asked how can I get this charge if I canceled after three years of service. I was advised by a person named Justin that I called them in July 2007, upgraded my service to HD and had canceled before my year was up. I responded that I had HD service since 2004 not just in 2007. I never called them in July. Furthermore, I felt that this fee was unjustified and requested that it be removed. Justin just repeated that I upgraded in 2007 and had to pay the fee.

Every two weeks since January, I have received a call harassing me to pay this $75 fee. I relate this story to each caller. But, each caller is unwilling to listen. They respond with someone" called them or received a call accepting a promotion to receive a discount for continuing service for another year. These callers can not tell me who they spoke to in July 2007.

In February 2008, I received a call from Lisa Holms with Directv requesting this fee be paid. I again explained the situation stating as far as I was concerned I fulfilled my contractual obligation in 2005. I never signed another contract with them after 2004. I never spoke to anyone or agreed to anything after 2004. I advised her that I still would be with Directv if they would have provided me with one upgrade. Instead, I switched to Dish TV who provided me with four HD boxes including a HD DVR.

Lisa Holms agreed that the $75 charge was unjustified given the circumstances. Ms Holms said she would contact her billing disputes department and they would get back to me.

In March 2008, I started receiving phone calls on a daily basis from a collection agency called Allied Interstate threatening me that if I did not pay they would report the debt to the credit reporting agencies.

ON March 21, 2008 I called Chase Carey, president of Dirctv. I was connected to a Jamie employee #4165 who stated she was assistant to the president. Once again I explained the situation. She was extremely rude in her response to me and demanded payment.

As you can see I made numerous attempts to clear this up. This company deals in deceptive practices and black male.



Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now