Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #642505

Complaint Review: Dr. Andrew Cassidy - Internet Internet

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: efl325 — Austin Texas United States of America
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Dr. Andrew Cassidy 11614 Fm 2244 Ste 150 Austin, TX 78738 Internet United States of America

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

 I saw Dr. Cassidy (Lone Star Podiatry) twice; once to get the fungal infection on my toe addressed and a second time to get fitted for custom orthotics. The first time I saw him he seemed distracted throughout the consult. I was there to get an infection on my toe fixed. I was prescribed a compounded RX available at only one pharmacy. Because the RX was a compounded (mixture of various drugs) variety, I had to submit endless forms to my insurance provider directly in order to get reimbursed. If I had been warned of this by anyone at the doctor's office I would have very unlikely agreed to the treatment as I needed to jump through hurdles every time I got refill to get reimbursed.
 
The second time I went in it was to get fitted for custom orthotics. Dr. Cassidy seemed present and attentive this time. He even cracked a few jokes and shared a few insightful tips on running and riding - a few hobbies we share. Thirty minutes later I was done. The receptionist checked me out and said I was to pay them full retail for the orthotics, $375. I reluctantly paid but had my doubts since all of the doctors I see are preferred, in-network providers of BCBS and my out-of-pocket costs are either a co-pay of $20 or a contracted rate before I meet my deductible. The doctor and his staff seemed nice enough and said charging full retail is what they always do with their other patients so I just paid and waited for them to call to get my brand new, custom-fitted orthotics. They gave me a sheet to submit to my insurance provider, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, to get reimbursed. I submitted the necessary forms to BCBS and was told the following: Dr. Andrew Cassidy is a preferred in-network provider (a participating provider) whereby BCBS and the doctor have agreed to contracted rates he is allowed to charge his patients. He should have charged you $190.63, not $375. You are entitled to recuperate the overpayment of $184.37. He refused to comply with refund request and BCBS has since filed a grievance with him on my behalf. Ultimately, if Dr. Cassidy/Lone Star Podiatry does not agree to refund the overpayment, he will no longer be a participating provider and I will be out $184. I need to note that I have made several attempts with the doctor's office to resolve this before getting BCBS to intervene, however, Rose, their manager, insisted they always charged full price for custom orthotics to avoid dealing with insurance providers themselves. Since they don't submit claims to to insurance companies themselves "they do not need to comply with the contracted rates". HOWEVER, BCBS has since confirmed that they have indeed filed an insurance claim but not on my behalf but for themselves, so essentially they double-billed;  they billed me once and got $375 and they billed BCBS to get more money! And this is how they've been doing business for as long as he's been fitting for custom orthotics!

NOTE: the service provider (in this case, Dr. Cassidy/Lone Star Podiatry) is responsible for submitting claims directly to your insurance provider if they are a network provider. The onus is on them to recuperate whatever fees they have agreed to with your insurance; it is never the patient's responsibility.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 09/20/2010 01:45 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/dr-andrew-cassidy/internet/dr-andrew-cassidy-lone-star-podiatry-went-in-to-get-a-bum-toe-checked-out-and-left-spendi-642505. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author
5Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#6 Author of original report

issue isn't about paperwork

AUTHOR: anonymous - (USA)

POSTED: Friday, October 01, 2010

dude can go ahead and TRY to sue me.  i've got a file of documents between me and BCBS that will support everything i am stating as pure fact.  what chance does he have if it's not slander?

my issue wasn't about completing paperwork myself. my issue is with his billing practices.  he insisted that he would not bill BCBS but they confirmed that he did, therefore, he essentially duped me and them by double-billing for one service.


Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 General Comment

yes you did

AUTHOR: debtexpert - (United States of America)

POSTED: Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Yes, and you missed my point again. I you read what I wrote I was only pointing out that it is the patients responsibility to make sure their insurance is doing what it is supposed to.

The only time a medical office is REQUIRED BY LAW to completely handle the insurance is Medicare. I didnt write the law, and I said I didnt completely agree with it either.    

So yes, you missed my point.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Consumer Comment

I missed the point?

AUTHOR: Flynrider - (USA)

POSTED: Monday, September 27, 2010

  The OP submitted the claim to BCBS :

"I submitted the necessary forms to BCBS and was told the following: Dr. Andrew Cassidy is a preferred in-network provider (a participating provider) whereby BCBS and the doctor have agreed to contracted rates he is allowed to charge his patients. He should have charged you $190.63, not $375"

  It would seem to me that the OP's complaint was being overcharged.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 General Comment

yes

AUTHOR: debtexpert - (United States of America)

POSTED: Friday, September 24, 2010

Yes thats true but you entirely missed the point.

What I was saying is--and anyone can check if they think I am not being truthful-- it is the policy-holders responsibility to make sure the claim is processed and followed though with if there is any problem--NOT the doctor.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Comment

Actually, actually

AUTHOR: Flynrider - (USA)

POSTED: Friday, September 24, 2010

"Since YOU have the contract with YOUR insurance agency, not the doctor,"

   If the doctor is in the insurance provider's network, he also has a contract with the ins. co. that details how much he will bill their customers for specific services.  

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 General Comment

actually

AUTHOR: debtexpert - (United States of America)

POSTED: Friday, September 24, 2010

I am sorry but you are wrong about one aspect.  Since YOU have the contract with YOUR  insurance agency, not the doctor, it is YOUR responsibility to make sure the insurance was billed, and YOUR job to find out if it was taken care of properly.

True, most(if not all) doctors offices will do this for you, but AS A CURTISY TO YOU, they don't have to. I know you will disagree with me, I'm not saying I like it either, but it is an absolute fact. Ask anyone who works in HIT.

Also FYI: doctor Cassidy sued the last person who posted something here about him, just so you know.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now