• Report: #458799
Complaint Review:

JAMS Alternative Dispute Resolution - David A. Garcia

  • Submitted: Fri, June 05, 2009
  • Updated: Tue, January 18, 2011

  • Reported By:San francisco California
JAMS Alternative Dispute Resolution - David A. Garcia
Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1500, San Francisco, California U.S.A.

JAMS Alternative Dispute Resolution Major conflict of interest San Francisco California

*General Comment: Stephen, I need your contact info...

*Author of original report: update

REBUTTAL BOX™ | Respond to this Report! | Consumer Comment

What's this?
Corporate Advocacy Program

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

Set the record straight:
Arbitration Program

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

I am writing this complaint because it is important to realize that binding arbitration is a dangerous clause to agree to in any contract.

When I signed a binding arbitration agreement in a business partnership contact, I didn't realize what I was getting myself into. Like most people, I had only vaguely heard of arbitration. When I did some research, arbitration seemed like a fair and honorable process. In fact, JAMS (Judicial Arbitration & Mediation Services) came highly recommended.

When a business dispute broke out between me and several individuals, the case had to go to arbitration as was stipulated in our contract. I believed in the "mediator ethics" section of JAMS, and felt that the case would be resolved fairly. I was very, very, very wrong.

First of all, the arbitrator selected failed to disclose the fact that he was not only good friends with the opposing counsel, but that they had both worked together on many cases in the past. Additionally, the opposing counsel had worked as the arbitrator's legal clerk when the opposing counsel was younger.

As is stated in the contract you must sign when working with JAMS, all arbitrators are guaranteed to be neutral. To honor the contact signed, the arbitrator was obligated to excuse himself from my case as this was a clear conflict of interest. The fact that the arbitrator continued to preside over my case can be considered nothing other than fraud.

Despite the fact a real court in San Francisco had ruled in my favor declaring the actions of the other party and opposing counsel illegal, the arbitrator decided to help out his friend the opposing counsel. Not only did the arbitrator overrule a decision made by a real court, but he specifically laughed when the opinion of the real judge cited the Supreme Court of California ruling on a similar case in my favor. All the arbitrator said was "the Supreme Court was meant to be overturned all the time." So, after spending over $50,000 for the arbitrator's time and $400,000 in legal fees, the arbitrator simply ruled in the opposing party's favor and completely reversed all damages I was paid in a real court of law.

To make matters worse, I discovered that there is no recourse for those who feel that they have been wronged by JAMS. When I wrote a letter complaining about the conflict of interest to the general counsel of JAMS Jay Welsh, he simply sent me an email telling me that I could try and sue the company if I felt wronged, and that he had more important things to do than worry about ethical conflicts with arbitrators.

I warn you now, never ever go to arbitration. You will get screwed. You will have no recourse. The arbitrator is free to do whatever he wants. As far as the law is concerned, the arbitrator is judge, jury, executioner. Once you step into a JAMS "courtroom," you are entering a kangaroo court, where the arbitrator completely above reproach.

San francisco, California

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 06/05/2009 12:20 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/jams-alternative-dispute-resolution-david-a-garcia/san-francisco-california-94111/jams-alternative-dispute-resolution-major-conflict-of-interest-san-francisco-california-458799. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on JAMS Alternative Dispute Resolution - David A. Garcia

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
0Author 2Consumer 0Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 General Comment

Stephen, I need your contact info...

AUTHOR: casper - (United States of America)

It is nice of you to share your story.

Can you help in finding conflicts that arbitrators do not disclose? How do you find it out? Do you have a report on Garcia? My email is (((Redacted))), please feel free to contact me and I can share more with you privately.

Thank you.

CLICK here to see why Rip-off Report, as a matter of policy, deleted either a phone number, link or e-mail address from this Report.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Author of original report


AUTHOR: Stephen - (U.S.A.)

For the record, the arbitrator's name was David A. Garcia. David Garcia works
out of the San Francisco office of JAMS. Avoid David Garcia as your arbitrator at all costs.
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?