Jio Lucci Jivanni Theft, Porn Pay Per View, Rent Evasion, Damage, Unpaid Uitilty Bills Beverly Hills, California

jio lucci 12-13 : Security/ Internet Court Judge view Malicious POSTS

Alert:internet:alert Jio Lucci Dec 13 2011 Court Judge Views Malicious Posts: Victim: Jio Lucci
809111   MALICIOUS POSTS:  SLANDER    12/13/2011 -

SECURITY: 223: Presented to a CA> Superior Ct Judge to View: DEFINITION: SLANDER 56 posts all TAGGED : by INTERNET SECURITYVICTIM: Jio Lucci(PERSON) definition: the one posting False written malice on the internet (ID: PERSON) is in Violations of California and United States Sections CodesPerson who is committing these malicious false posts was ordered to stop: ContinuesPerson has violated acts of slander against: Jio Lucci and used the internet as a toolBoth Civil and criminal penalties will be sought after : the (PERSON)In the state of California slander (California Civil Code 46) isrectified in civil court. The tort test for slander is a simplefive-part examination that you apply to your own circumstances todetermine of a case exists. This is the same test that a jury wouldapply in considering a civil judgement: If posts continue: criminal violations may apply1) Is there evidence that the defendant made a false oral or spokenstatement concerning the plaintiff? Yes Libel: written Posted on Internet 56 xsVICTIM: JIO LUCCI

12-13-20112) Is there evidence that the statement was defamatory, i.e., that ithad the capability of harming the plaintiff's reputation if it werebelieved? YES: posted 56 malicious posts against Coach Jio LucciVICTIM: Jio Lucci 12-13-20113) Is there evidence that the defendant communicated that statement toa person other than the plaintiff? YES: Used The INTERNET AS A TOOL plus paid a Company to ADDITIONAL post and paid themVictim: JioLucci 12-13-20114) Is there evidence that the defendant knew the defamatory statementwas false, OR acted in reckless disregard as to whether the statement were false or not? ALL Malicious Defamatory statement: Per Section Code 46 Libel SlanderVictim: Jio Lucci 12-13-20115) Is there evidence that the plaintiff suffered actual harm of apecuniary nature, i.e., suffered a financial loss, as a result of thedefamatory statement being made and believed by a third person, OR ifthere is no actual financial harm, does the slander take the form ofeither
a) Statements imputing morally culpable criminal behavior . YES : The
(person) is attempting to harm, mislead Coach Jio Lucci Clients, harm
him in the industry:Victim: Jio Lucci 12-13-2011ADDED: (PERSON) using Falsified WORDS (BEYOND THE REALM of Dispute , if any)Identity Theft: posted Jio Lucci personal information: (attached written slander)ThiefTheftCon manP---FilthMore to be provided: Using "kids" as a tool to DETOUR THE PARENT.PERSON now Identified as: SLANDERER evil and unlawful act: to harm the reputation of Jio Lucci.......punitive damages/ revenue damages

______________________________This
Person who is maliciously harassing Jio Lucci on the Internet Posts was
asked in a CIVIL MANNER to stop, remove. This was an attempt to give
the person a chance for all written posts removed and disolved. In any
DISPUTE ( IF ANY), no matter what the argument or situation is, THIS
PERSON IS IN TOTAL VIOLATION OF CA Section CODE 46 : Libel Slander. In
the event that the (PERSON) continues posts, it will be construded and
prosecuted as criminal addition to civil.Kent LLegal / Attorney

w/ Security/ Internet

GOOGGLE Assistance