Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #536423

Complaint Review: Liberty Credit Law - Internet

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Jazzy1 — Lancaster Texas USA
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Liberty Credit Law Many addresses Internet United States of America

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

In June 2009, Iwas cold called by Al Navarra about help with mortgage loan modification Upon receiving the call, I was uncomfortable with discussing money or my loan until I verified that this was not an attempt at identity theft and asked for a call back in one week. After doing research online, I found that this was a real company and discussed my mortgage situation with Al. When discussing the amount of the service, Al stated that a $495 retainer fee was due before any work could be completed on the case, another fee would be due once the mortgage company agreed to modify the loan, and a third fee would be due before the proper paperwork could be submitted to modify the loan. I asked if I changed my mind about the service, at what point am I no longer entitled to a refund. He stated that once loan information was collected from the mortgage company, I would no longer be entitled to a refund of the retainer fee, but the other fees would no longer apply as well. On or about June 24, 2009, I gave Al my credit card number over the phone and was charged $495.00. A few days letter, Al submitted to me a contract for service and power of attorney via email. No where in the contract did a refund policy dispute what had been previously told to me by Al. I submitted the contract and power of attorney to Al. Several days later, I got a letter from my mortgage company (CitiMortgage) stating that they had received the power of attorney but it was not accepted. CitiMortgage would need me to fill out their power of attorney form in order for the company to turn my loan documentation over to Liberty Credit Law. I never signed nor submitted CitiMortgages power of attorney. Additionally, there was quite a bit of personal documents (pay stubs, bank records, tax returns, etc) that Liberty Credit Law asked for. At no time was any of this documentation submitted to them. My financial situation changed shortly after (August) and I felt I no longer needed Liberty Credit Laws service so I called Al Navarra to inquire about the refund process but my call was not returned. On November 6, 2009, I received an email from Michelle Matos asking for the personal documents again. I replied to her message, again asking for the process to request a refund. On November 9, 2009, I received an email from Marie Eschrich stating that she had received my email from Michelle and asked for me to give her a call. I called the very same day and had to leave a voice mail. She called back and I verbally requested a refund. By November 18, 2009, I had not heard back so I emailed Marie again asking for a status and she again replied with a request to contact her via phone. I made two calls and left two voicemails, to which neither had been returned, so I again emailed her asking what more was there to discuss as I was simply looking for a status of my refund. Eventually, she did respond via email, but this time stated that she needed my request in writing. On November 19, 2009 I submitted the written refund request. On November 30, 2009 I, again, had heard nothing, so I emailed Marie asking for a status of the refund request; no response. On December 2, 2009, another refund status request went to Marie via email to which she replied that a letter had been sent to my home. The letter arrived and stated that the retainer would not be refunded because the office had begun to gather documents. This is impossible as I did not submit any to them outside of the contract and power of attorney. The mortgage company rejected the power of attorney so there could not have been any documentation received from CitiMortgage. According to their website, they also operate in the following areas so beware!!: Debt Settlement, Bankruptcy Chapter 7, Bankruptcy Chapter 13, Mortgage Compliance, Short Sales, FDCPA Enforcement, Creditor Litigation Defense, Credit Repair, Property Tax Reduction

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 12/09/2009 08:58 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/liberty-credit-law/internet/liberty-credit-law-they-want-to-take-your-money-not-save-you-money-beware-internet-536423. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author
0Consumer
2Employee/Owner

#3 REBUTTAL Owner of company

I was ripped off

AUTHOR: Lynnaire B - ()

POSTED: Saturday, May 31, 2014

I was called on April 8, by a representive of Liberty Credit Law. I was told they could repair my credit in four weeks. All I had to do was pay $70.00 and an extra $12.00 for a credit report. After i paid I was transfered to a paralegal who was suppose to work with me. I was then told it might take up to a year to complete my credit repair and I would be charged on my credit card $90.00 a month till My credit score was fixed.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Author of original report

Typical lawyers and more lies

AUTHOR: Jazzy1 - (USA)

POSTED: Thursday, December 17, 2009

I'll just point out the many lies told in the rebutal alone!

"Upon enrollment Liberty carefully evaluates a clients financial situation, works with them to draft a hardship letter which clearly sets out their hardship in a manner the banks can accept and a unique proposal and analysis is prepared and transmitted to the bank. " - The same cold-caller told me what to write in the letter. Considering this is one of the many documents that was requested but not actually given to the company OR the bank, it's hard to see how anyone worked with me on it.

"In the case of this client, detailed notes are replete with requests for documents and an original power of attorney. The client was contacted no less than 20 times requesting documents in order to complete the file." - Of course there were many requests for the documents...I had been requesting a refund since AUGUST!

"On November 30, 2009 Liberty wrote to the client discontinuing its services due to a lack of cooperation. " - WRITTEN requests for refund were made November 9th, November 18th, and November 19th. The only lack of cooperation is that of Liberty Credit Law.

"Liberty Credit Law performed substantial work on behalf of this client" ~ There was NO documentation received except for the initial contract for services. The many requests for documetation (although 20 is also quite an overestimate) prove that there was no work done because they had nothing to work with!

 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Discontinued Client

AUTHOR: Liberty Credit Law, P.C. - (United States of America)

POSTED: Friday, December 11, 2009
We have reviewed this clients file, and while it is not normally our policy to comment on former or current clients, we would like to point out the many inaccuracies in the statement as published by Ripoff Report. Liberty Credit Law, P.C. ("Liberty") is a law firm focused on assisting consumers with financial related legal matters. The law firm has  a specialization in loan modification and other areas of consumer law. Liberty is committed to protecting the rights of consumers with lenders, many of which have benefited from predatory lending practices. Additionally, the firm assists consumers in financial distress whenever practical. Liberty has developed an excellent and very affective methodology for negotiating with the lenders for loan modifications both under the Making Homes Affordable Program and traditionally, to make certain the consumer obtains the best possible arrangement from the lender which certainly does not look out for the consumers best interest. Upon enrollment Liberty carefully evaluates a clients financial situation, works with them to draft a hardship letter which clearly sets out their hardship in a manner the banks can accept and a unique proposal and analysis is prepared and transmitted to the bank. Before submission to the bank  a power of attorney is submitted (notarized and hand signed by the client) to establish  representation of the client. Although a law firm is under no obligation to provide a power of attorney, Liberty has found that some stubborn banks simply will not work with us without the receipt of such document. In the case of this client,  detailed notes are replete with requests for documents and an original power of attorney. The client was contacted  no less than 20 times requesting documents in order to complete the file. While some of these documents were provided others were not. On November 30, 2009 Liberty wrote to the client discontinuing its services due to a lack of cooperation.



The request for refund of the $495.00 retainer in this instance was inappropriate since substantial work was performed on behalf of this client and it was the clients lack of cooperation that would not allow us to move forward with a loan modification. Of course many banks attempt to make obtaining a loan modification as difficult as possible and will use any excuse to avoid having to deal with loan modifications. Many banks outwardly discourage consumers from dealing with attorneys that are well suited to assist them in navigating through the morass of getting a loan modified. Furthermore, the banks all have attorneys representing them. Liberty believes that consumers should have the same right.



Liberty Credit Law performed substantial work on behalf of this client. Liberty works very hard on behalf of all of its  clients and continuously renegotiates and pursues better results when encountering stubborn and uncooperative lenders. It must also be pointed out that the first client contact was not a cold call. The client responded to direct mail marketing. Liberty has  record of the advertisement having been mailed and the client initiating a call to its office.



Liberty Credit Law is very sensitive to the needs of its clients and the fact that the economy today has left people with very little money to enforce their rights. Liberty has a very liberal policy in refunding fees under the right circumstances. In this case substantial work was performed for the client and the relationship was terminated by Liberty due to the clients lack of cooperation.  The attorney client relationship is two waythe client must cooperate with us.



Liberty Credit Law, P.C.



www.libertycreditlaw.com



Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now