Complaint Review: Mark Pleplowski, Esq - North Las Vegas Nevada
- Mark Pleplowski, Esq 4266 Lasha Court North Las Vegas, Nevada United States of America
- Phone:
- Web:
- Category: Attorneys & Legal Services
Mark Pleplowski, Esq Caused me to loose my children North Las Vegas, Nevada
*Consumer Comment: Rip-off was the Judge, not the lawyer
*Consumer Comment: Logically flawed
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
Mr. Peplowski briefly represented me in Family Court in 2001 when some post divorce issues arose with my ex-husband - Non payment of child support, child visitation, and harrassment. No further issue resolution was necessary until mid 2005.
In 2004 with the assistance of my ex-husband, my 2 daughters and I moved back to our home state of Ohio. My ex-husband also moved back to Ohio in late April 2005. In May of 2005 I again started experiencing some of the same issues with my ex-husband as I did in 2001. At that time, I saught legal assistance in Ohio.
Although Ohio did register my divorce decree and child custody papers, additional issues of Jurisdiction came up because the divorce took place in Las Vegas, Nevada. As of October 2005 Mark Pleplowski was contacted and acted as my attorney of record in Family Court in Las Vegas.
After providing all of my information to Mark Pleplowski, I requested that he get an Evedentuary Hearing scheduled to prove that Ohio did have jurisdiction over the case. This was not done. He wrote a 50 page Motion that was never heard in court - I'm not even sure it was actually filed to be heard in Las Vegas Family Court.
Mr. Pleplowski had stated in court that he was working for me Pro Bono (free of charge) basis. In May of 2006 at the time he was to be filling the 50 page motion, he asked me to send him $500.00, which I did.
It was difficult at best to reach Mr. Pleplowski by phone or even e-mail until just before an August 2006 hearing in Las Vegas Family Court.
While doing some web surfing in early September 2006, I ran across the Las Vegas Review Journal report on the Metropolitan Police Prostitution Sting that contained a picture of my attorney - Mark Peplowski. I fired him on the spot!
In November of 2006 the Las Vegas Family Court Judge - Sandra Pomerenze awarded my ex-husband custody of my 2 daughters with out hearing anything from my side. It took me an additional 2 years, an additional $15,000.00 and a whole lot of hurt placed on me before the Las Vegas Family Court Judge would agree to an Evedentuary Hearing.
I won the Evidentuary Hearing on September 29, 2007 in Las Vegas Family Court. However, not everything could be put back to square one. I lost my kids, I lost my home, I lost my right to a review of the support not paid by my ex-husband (approx. $50,000.00), and as of February 2009 50% of my unemployment check has been going to pay for my portion of support instead of the customary (according to Nevada Law) 25% for 2 children.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/09/2010 03:15 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/mark-pleplowski-esq/north-las-vegas-nevada-89032/mark-pleplowski-esq-caused-me-to-loose-my-children-north-las-vegas-nevada-591462. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:



#2 Consumer Comment
Rip-off was the Judge, not the lawyer
AUTHOR: Anonymous - (United States)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, March 07, 2018
My divorce cost me $75,000 in attorney's fees and I still lost my kids too. I know plenty who have paid much more than this. It wasn't the attorney who ripped me or you off. It was the judge, who happened to be the same one as yours. Family law is a great money maker for the Court. The more times you have to keep going back, the better for them. It isn't really about what is best for the kids, or for the ease of already hurt feelings. What "should" happen gets tossed out the window for whatever way the lawyers want to spin the story to keep clients there longer. I was going for joint custody and a 50/50 split of financials, nothing wild or crazy.
I had a stable home, a good paying, moral job I had worked at for several years, plenty of family support, no criminal or civil record, no psychological or medical issues, etc, and all with plenty of evidence to prove it. All of this didn't matter. I lost all assets, my home, vehicles, my kids' college funds, and anything that was worth money. I had to file bankruptcy. I didn't give up. A couple years later, I got my kids back, my ex went to prison, and I built my life back up. Life goes on, if your work for it. Your kids are watching.
You are claiming this attorney (who doesn't have a single black mark on his professional record and has helped countless families and individuals for free or well below industry standard pay) who was doing you a favor by only charging you $500 (which is the industry standard of approximately 2 hours of work) to file a 50 page document and appear in court, no less than twice on your behalf, ripped you off.
Here is some information to help those who don't understand the family court process... If you eventually had a hearing, papers didn't file themselves. The Court charges a filing fee to file documents, hence the reason he charged you. Additionally, one doesn't just file for an evidentiary hearing. You have to go through no less than 2 court appearances prior to that, a calendar call, and most likely an attempt at mediation before that happens. Most attorneys generally charge about $50 per e-mail or telephone call answered.
This attorney that you fired, easily worked at least 20-30 hours or more on your case for free to get you to that point before you let him go for something completely unrelated to your case. The incident you refer to of him being arrested led to no conviction and all charges dropped by the time your case was heard. So, it would seem that he is at least a decent enough attorney to take care of his own legal problems. He continues to practice law, volunteer as a pro tem justice of the peace, and is a award winning professor, among many other hats he wears volunteering in his community.
The formula you are talking about refers to child support calculation. You owed child support "arrears" which are calculated in addition to the standard formula so that you can eventually "catch up." This also, is not the attorney's fault, but an actual Nevada law. As for having to pay that from your "unemployment check," well, kids don't raise themselves. They don't just stop eating, or needing a roof over their heads, or needing medical attention because you can't or won't work. Purposefully not working so you don't have to pay child support hurts nobody but your kids. They deserve to be raised by a responsible parent in a stable home.

#1 Consumer Comment
Logically flawed
AUTHOR: Tim - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Ok, I understand not wanting to be represented by an attorney who was busted in a prostitution sting.
But nonetheless, you voluntarily fired your attorney two months prior to an important hearing, and apparently failed to secure alternate counsel.
So what did you expect to happen at the hearing? You didn't have anyone there to represent you. Of course you lost.
Your complaint title states that this attorney caused you to lose your children. It takes some pretty circuitous logic to arrive at this conclusion. Basically, what you're saying is that this attorney's alleged penchant for ladies of the evening cost you the custody of your children.
The reality is that your personal aversion to the attorney's activities, coupled with your failure to assure that you were represented, cost you the custody of your children.
I guess I just don't see how you can blame someone for the outcome of a proceeding where you prevented him from even participating.


Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.