Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1097281

Complaint Review: Provincial Court of British Columbia - Vancouver, BC British Columbia

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: ADL — Washington Dist of Columbia
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Provincial Court of British Columbia 800 Hornby Street Vancouver, BC, British Columbia Canada

Provincial Court of British Columbia Judicial J Zahid Makhdoom The Chief Judge of the Provincial Court of British Columbia Muslim Koran in the Canadian Court Room, British Columbia Provincial Court, by Muslim Judge Zahid Makhdoom Vancouver, British Columbia CANADA

*Consumer Comment: Zahid Makdhoom was the subject of past complaints

*General Comment: And...

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

 This complaint is made on behalf of the public:

Take notice that it is alleged that the British Columbia Provincial Court allows a Muslim Judicial Justice of Peace aka Provincial Court Judge to bring into the courtroom a Koran, which is the Islamic book of Muslim law.

The BC Provincial courtroom correctly leaves the Bible in the courtroom; however, the Koran is also brought by and through the presence of Muslim Zahid Makhdoom in the Robson Square location located in downtown Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. The Koran teaches that women are inferior to men, as we understand it.

Muslim Makhdoom refused to hold a male witness responsible despite the fact that the witness admitted to defying a court-ordered summons to appear and give evidence in court, according to records; when in fact the witness went on vacation instead, on his own admission in the records. We understand that Makhdoom J. permitted this contempt of court of the witness to go unpunished, and did so at the expense of the BC tax-payers and the person who summoned the witness, a student who is Jewish and a female.

We understand that Makhdoom J. spent several months in prison in Pakistan, according to a website of a Pakistani organization in which Makhdoom claims to be president. We understand that Pakistan is a primitive society that does not respect women or their rights. We understand that Pakistani women are often the subject of abuse by men, and that Islamic law does not protect them in Pakistan.

 We understand that while Makhdoom J. was a judicial justice of the peace, he has publicly attacked the actions of the United States government and Israel, contrary to the ethical guidelines by which Makhdoom J. is bound, which requires him to govern himself accordingly.

We understand that Office of the Chief Judge Crabtree refused to question Muslim Makhdoom's action of bringing the Koran into the courtroom, which is supposed to be a medium for the administration of justice and rather than for discrimination against any persons.

We understand that a formal complaint has been made to the Office of the Chief Judge Crabtree against Makhdoom, Zahid. We will update the status thereof once we are informed thereabout. Wherefore, we respectfully submit this complaint on behalf of the public, particularly the women of British Columbia. 

The Anti-Defamation League was founded in 1913 "to stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all."

 

 

 

 

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/05/2013 10:13 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/provincial-court-of-british-columbia/vancouver-bc-british-columbia-v6z-2c5/provincial-court-of-british-columbia-judicial-j-zahid-makhdoom-the-chief-judge-of-the-pro-1097281. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
2Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#2 Consumer Comment

Zahid Makdhoom was the subject of past complaints

AUTHOR: David - ()

POSTED: Sunday, November 17, 2013

 In the Supreme Court of British Columbia

 

R. v. Vasquez,

2012 BCSC 1648

 

 

 

Regina

v.

Carlos Vasquez and Dorothy Villanueva

 

The appellant’s grounds of appeal of their convictions are that they did not receive a fair trial, that Judicial Justice of the Peace Zahid Makdhoom who conducted the trial failed to give effect to relevant evidence, and that Makhdoom, JJ belittled and insulted them.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 General Comment

And...

AUTHOR: Tyg - ()

POSTED: Wednesday, November 06, 2013

 The ADL acts no better then the religions they suppose to represent. Seems to me that this post is more defaming then a ANTI-DEFIMATION LEAGUE should be doing. I mean really is this what the ADL is about. Cyber attacking a judiciary action? YOU may not agree with this individuals actions, but to bring in the ADL on a post like this. Your tin foil hat rant sounds surprisingly ONE SIDED. ANY judge brings thier own experiences to the bench. Including religion. Its all part and parcel of being a human creature. As long as no LAWS were broken, the judge CAN and DOES have the right to ignore minor infractions. Such as contempt of court.

What YOU are doing is called cyber bullying. YOU dont like this person for OBVIOUS religous reasons. YOU have decided that YOU will do something about this. And now to add to your list of crimes. You are bashing him for his religion and his beliefs. Is any of this getting through to you??

So once again the oppressed become the oppresors. YOU dont like the judges views so YOU are now the oppressor. How does it feel knowing that you are attempting to ruin a man and his career because YOU disagree with which version of god he choses to believe in. YOUR narrow mindedness truly sickens me.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now