Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #418444

Complaint Review: THE VELD GROUP - LOS ANGELES California

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Los Angeles California
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • THE VELD GROUP 8721 W. SUNSET BLVD. SUITE #103 LOS ANGELES, California U.S.A.

THE VELD GROUP THE VELD GROUP ARE A BUNCH OF CON ARTIST!! THEY LIE CHEAT AND STEAL FROM BOTH SELLERS AND BUYERS OF BUSINESSES!! LOS ANGELES California

*UPDATE Employee: RE: PJs Allocations against TVG

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

The Veld Group are brokers who assist business owners (the seller) with selling their business and assist people (the buyer) who want to buy a business amongst other things. But this is where both the seller and buyer need to beware when dealing with this unscrupulous company!!

First, I am going to tell you what had transpired between The Veld Group and myself. The Veld Group was representing a seller of a business that the company that I work for became interested in buying.

The typical procedure in locating and researching businesses for sale off the internet basically goes like this:
1. a buyer finds a business that he is interested in possibly buying
2. buyer sends email to the broker requesting a nondisclosure agreement (NDA)
3. broker sends buyer the NDA
4. buyer reads and then signs the NDA and faxes it back to the broker along
with the buyer's financials so the broker can see that the buyer is capable
of buying the business
5. the next thing experienced buyers request to see is the last several years
of the business' tax returns to verify the business is truly netting the
amount of money the broker was advertising the business to be earning.

This is where The Veld Group is different than 99% of all other broker companies. The Veld Group demands that the buyer commits to a purchase price and then also demands that some up front monies be put down on the business (usually $10k to $20k) as a show of good faith money before they will release any other documents of the business history.

An experienced broker in any brokerage company would be trying this approach but it is only The Veld Group that will not negotiate these two requirements and lie and cheat in the process in order to try and secure the two requirements. This is done also by brokers so they lock in a buyer for the business. Now, if the buyer finds out later that the business information is not correct and in turn the buyer now knows that the business is not worth what the seller is selling the business for, he can not just pull out. The broker has leverage on the buyer with the Purchase Agreement Contract as well as the up front money so the buyer understandably is in a complete losing situation and the seller gets the up front money at the bare minimum.

An experienced buyer's response to a broker when they request these two things is simply that with out seeing the tax returns then it is impossible for the buyer to be at least 85% certain as to what the business is truly making and if the business is not what they are advertising the business to be netting yearly then the buyer does not want anything to do with the business. So the broker's requests for a Purchase Price Agreement and up front monies is totally out of the question in any situation and especially in the case when the buyer can not verify the true net value of the business.

It is at this time that 99% of all brokers remove the silly demand of a purchase price agreement as well as the down payment of good faith money. The broker now usually would submit the tax returns to the buyer so they could possibly move forward and sell the business but also because the buyer's response is fair and really the correct thing to do. Not The Veld Group though!

After I faxed to the broker the signed NDA and my financials and the broker had sent me the first round of information on the business, I asked for the tax returns. The broker whose name is Ryan Clark called me up and over a series of conversations over the next week as we went back and fourth over Ryan wanting us to submit the Purchase Agreement and up front money and me defending my position as to why it was not only impossible but it was just not fair for us to commit to his request, I began to believe in, "The information is 100% good" or "I believe in being 100% honest" or "who needs bad Carma" and "we have been in business for 8 years now and do you think that we could get away that long if we burned our clients" and things of that nature spoken by Ryan.

Anyways, during these conversations Ryan kept stating that all the information was absolutley correct and that he himself had seen all the tax returns as well as documentation from the business' accountant such as the Profit & Loss statements and other documents of this nature which verified that the business was once again honestly netting what they had advertised.

After the week and several of these conversations with Ryan had past, Ryan convinced me that the information was at the very worst not more than 5% off of the advertised net listing and really 100% correct. If only we just submitted the Purchase Price Agreement with $10k as good faith money then we would be provided any documentation of the business and see it for ourselves. He kept saying for me to remember that this was just really a formality as Ryan was certain that we would buy the business because the business was everything they claimed it to be.

By now we agreed and submitted the $10k and a Purchase Agreement which was written where we could get out if the business was not as advertised but nothing could protect the money. We finished submitting everything and I again requested to see the tax returns and any other financial documentation they had in which they gave it all to me, I thought.

Over the next couple of days, we decided to pursue the purchase of the business. after three more weeks, we had did our due diligence of thoroughly checking out the business and we were in the process of buying the business.

In order to move forward with the purchase of the business, The Veld Group and Ryan now requested that they wanted $120k put into escrow so we could then finalize the purchase. I am not going into all the negotiations and the final structure of the deal we negotiated but basically we had 130K total in escrow which was going directly to the seller upon the sale of the business.

It was during these final stages of the purchase of the business was when one of our investigators realized that the figures on the tax returns were not correct. That started the domino affect on the rest of the financial numbers and actually made us realize that we should have realized that someone was out right lying earlier and taught another way on how to analyze certain aspects of a business financial information but for this deal it was to little to late.

Upon our discovery, we requested a sit down meeting with the seller and the broker which they scheduled with us. On the day of the meeting, we presented the information to them. We then notified them of our decision that due to the new information that we no longer were going to be buying the business and we would appreciate that they just return our money since the information was all falsified!!

And this is when I became extremely shocked. The broker started claiming that they ( the broker and the broker's company) had no responsibility to us with regards to the verification of any information of the business they were selling and that once again there was absolutely nothing wrong with the business' financials. I replied, "It is true that on the contract you are not liable for the verification of any information but remember Ryan all your swearing up and down how great the financials truly are and that you, yourself had verified the financial information and that we were going to be very happy with this business because everything was on the up and up!!"

Ryan acquired amnesia and the sellers were also totally denying everything.

This is where we are now. When buying businesses through a broker, the contracts usually require any dispute must go through mediation and not through a court proceeding. It is a common procedure.

After hiring an attorney and to get to the first meeting of the mediation cost us a little over $10k. We were informed at the mediation that if we did not come to some form of an agreement now of how to split my $130k in escrow with the seller and a second meeting was required so the mediation could make its final decision as to how to split the money or if one side was deserving verses the other side the mediation would be charging $25k for that next meeting.

Now, our company is out $10k in legal fees so far, $130k tied up in escrow due to all lies and the misrepresentation of the business presented by The Veld Group and the seller. They now are fighting me over the money put into escrow to purchase a completely false business which is built on lies, and lastly we will possibly have to pay another 25k just so we can listen to a mediation representative make a decision as to how much money we might get back out of the $130k if the seller, broker, and myself are unable to come up with an agreement as to how we should split the $130k.

The seller and broker wanted $80k and for us to take $50k and I do not know if we had the same thought process or what but that was exactly what we came up with except for we were to receive the $80k and they would get $50K. Regardless, it is more cost effective for us to to come to some sort of an arrangement with the broker and seller before we have to schedule the second mediation and pay an additional $25k on top of everything else.

Looking over everything that has transpired up until know and reviewing not only the attitudes but the behavior of not only the broker and the seller but also the mediation group. We truly thought that with all the information and proof that we had that we would be awarded all of the $130k at the first meeting but it did not workout like that. This is our assessment as to what is transpiring and truly happening with this whole ordeal.

First, The Veld Group and this whole deal is not an isolated incident. We have located at least two other buyers that have similar experiences with The Veld Group and they to ended up in mediation and paying them for their services besides having to pay The Veld Group. The buyers of those two different incidences decided like us that it would be cheapest by agreeing to give The Veld Group an agreed upon split of all the money in escrow or face having to pay additional mediation charges and also having to put all your chances of every getting any of your money back in the hands of a mediation group that seems to have some type of understanding with your/the opponent (The Veld Group)! Remember, The Veld Group does bring in large sums of revenue to the mediation group. The old say,"Don't bite the hand that feeds you." That just did not originate out of thin air but there is a lot of truth behind that saying and it could not be more prevalent than with these two groups!!

Secondly, The Veld Group should at least make $50k if not more by the time we are finally done with all the mediation and everything is over. REMEMBER THAT THEY MAKE MONEY LITERALLY FOR ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!! Now if you times that by 5 to 10 companies every 4 months you come up with that The Veld Group makes some where from $250k to $500k at the bare minimum every quarter and once again that is acquired by listing businesses in which their financials are a complete lie and then misrepresenting those businesses to some unsuspecting buyer whose best bet is to give The Veld Group at least half of the money that the buyer put into escrow to start the buying procedure if they are ever lucky to uncover the lies before buying the business.

Another thing to remember is that The Veld Group probably makes much more on these falsified businesses because if the buyer is not fortunate enough to uncover the lies until they own the business out right. Then the buyer not only got scammed hundreds of thousands of dollars for a bad business but then the buyer better hope that he is creative enough to turn the bad business around if he is lucky and if not then the buyer is out thousands of dollars more trying to make a bad thing from the start into a salvageable thing!! And on the other side, The Veld Group goes off laughing all the way to the bank!!

This is completely B.S. The mediation does not care about getting to the truth as much as they seem to be more interested in trying to get us committed to the second part of the mediation and collect the $25k (the mediation's behavior I will file a report on them on another day).

PJ
Los Angeles, California
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/31/2009 04:52 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/report/s/the-veld-group/los-angeles-california-90069-418444. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#1 UPDATE Employee

RE: PJs Allocations against TVG

AUTHOR: The veld group - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Wednesday, September 23, 2009

TVG has never been in contact with this anonymous person, nor have we ever been involved in a mediation proceeding with this, or any other party (our contracts call for Arbitration). Certainly our clients have been involved in such proceedings, however, such disputes are inevitable when 100s of businesses have been sold. As of 5/18/09, TVG had never received any financial benefit from any mediation, arbitration or court action that any of our clients have been involved in. TVG has never lost any type of proceeding, and has only received awards from matters that we initiated, or that were brought against us.

TVG does, however, invite this anonymous party to contact us if they seek to set the record straight. While the allegations are without merit, and include outrageous claims that the Mediation System, Arbitration Association and U.S. Court System have conspired with TVG to cheat buyers out of earnest money deposits, some of the facts presented do loosely mirror a mediation that one of our clients of our were involved in. If PJ was actually involved in this matter we would not know, as we were not a party to it. By publishing the details of this case, however, he would be in direct violation of the rules of confidentially associated with a mediation, arbitration, or court action.

The fact that TVG is not, nor has ever been in any mediation is a matter of public record that we invite anyone to research. Our firm is extremely transparent in this manner, as transparency is one of the most important attributes of a business intermediary. TVG regularly transacts over 100 business sales per annum without issue or complaint. We encourage every business buyer and seller to conduct extensive research on any intermediary firm that they consider working with. TVGs stellar track record speaks for itself, and has made our firm the industry standard bearer.

To address the aforementioned allegation, we will make our best attempt. PJs case loosely resembles a mediation proceeding that one of our 1,000s of former clients were involved with. In this instance, our clients were the Sellers of an eight location service and retail chain. A Buyers broker submitted a Letter of Intent (LOI) on our clients business; the Buyer later submitted an offer to purchase on the business. Per his Seller-accepted purchase contract, he placed a $30,000 (roughly 3.0%) earnest money deposit in an escrow account (as is protocol in any real estate transaction). To everyones surprise, Escrow notified TVG that the deposit came from 30 different buyers. TVG came to learn that the Buyer appeared to be pooling the funds of 30 buyers to finance the $925,000 acquisition.

The Buyer(s) completed due diligence with the businesses tax returns, bank statements, etc. not only provided to him, but also to his investors and several of their advisors, but did not move the sale forward per his purchase contract. After the business had been in escrow for approximately nine months, roughly eight months longer than our clients agreed to, the Buyer approved the due diligence results. Per the purchase contract, the Buyer placed an additional $100,000 into the escrow account at this time (it was to be deposited upon approval of due diligence which was likely why due diligence took nearly nine months to complete). Also per the term our clients purchase contract, the Buyer agreed to forfeit all earnest money deposits. As the Buyer had not attempted to facilitate the eight lease assignment, he also released this contingency to the sale.

Nearly one year after our client accepted the Buyers offer, and three months after due diligence had been completed an signed-off on, the group of investors contacted TVG and demanded that our client accept a reduced purchase to induce them to move forward. When our clients did not agree to the proposed purchase price reduction, the investors demanded an updated business income tax return in an attempt to re-open due diligence. As it appeared that the demand was a tactic to re-negotiate the purchase price since sales had suffered over the course of the year that had passed, the Sellers did not provide the updated return. The investors (the actual Buyer appeared to no longer be involved in the sale) sought the return of the $130,000 in earnest monies, which the Buyer had already agreed to forfeit to the Sellers in exchange for the prolonged escrow. While the Seller agreed to cancel the escrow, the investors were adamant that the earnest monies should be returned to them. It appeared that not all of the investors were aware of the terms of the purchase contract, or that their Buyer had already released these funds to the Seller. Perhaps because many of them were from different countries and did not speak English, or one anothers native languages, it appeared that they were not communicating directly with the Buyer or one another.

TVG did become aware that the investors (not the Buyer) filed for mediation against our former clients (the Sellers, not TVG) some time ago. While we were not privy to the details of the case due to the rules of confidentially, we did come to understand that our client was awarded a portion of the monies due to him per the terms of the executed purchase contract. As there was a very clear chain of evidence documenting everything that had transpired, TVG was neither deposed, nor called to testify in the matter. All documentation regarding this sale was very clear, and spoke for itself.

TVG is not aware of any action the investors have taken against the Buyer, but it appears that any complaint may be more appropriately directed at him. Given that the person making this report has sought to remain anonymous, it may not be unreasonable to surmise that this complaint may have actually been initiated by the Buyer in an attempt to redirect blame for any monies his investors lost.

TVG encourages any party that seeks additional information regarding this matter, or any other matter, to contact our office directly at 310.652.8353. We will be happy to provide any information that we can to clarify the components of the business sale process, to elaborate on standard business brokerage protocol, or to share as many details as are available on the 150 plus opportunities that we typically have on the market.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now