Trevor Goble Manipulative, Liar, False Truthes Ottawa, Ontario

I spoke to John's brother who owns a local business in Pembroke and guess what Trevor has never asked or attempted to get money from him at all.  Another lie from Mr. Lavoie!

Nice try with those fake legal letters stealing stamps from clinics didnty help you did it Didnt expect me to call Appletree you need help ps nice try with that other bullsh*t scam you tried over the weekend I am on too its like playing chess with you this time im 5 moves ahead your contact information is all over the net and highway motors and second chance auto your two new scams will be dealt with I will give them all the info they need to win your fake para legal s**t will come to an end my friend lol stop calling my brother and trying to extort him for money

Don't you John have several corporations?  Nothing illegal about that!  He has never told anyone that I am aware of that he was a lawyer, even you admitted in an email stating "I know you never told me you were a lawyer".  When did he get caught for stealing at Walmart...that's right it was him. 

Stealing peoples ID to get credit cards....do you mean the application he filled out for me to get a loan and credit card and at the time I was moving?  Wow, really.  Funny you claim about the internet for people in fake companies name....assuming the company is fake?  If the internet is hooked up in a fake company then contact the internet provider and report it.  That's right as you say "it's your girlfriend".  (lol).  

Is this how you handle yourself to get out of paying people?   I have been reading more and more about you two and to be honest when it comes to posting on the internet both of you are acting like children but I also notice Trevor has stopped for a few month but you keep right on going...Trevor even admits it.  When I watched you in Court and stand up wanting Trevor to stop posting online...I find more humor that the person demanding the postings to stop keeps right on doing it.

He showed me a few documents and it is perfectly clear that you impersonate him to get information from a company.  Did you true to get a credit card in my name?  It has been proven to me that you are capable of using other peoples names and apparently want Trevor arrested at all cost ... why because you owe him money? 

Do you think you and his ex have the right information?   I know you don't...feeding false information is not illegal but using false information is ... you should read about slander and libel.   You are a businessman (so you claim) you should know about due diligence...exercise it and research first before just putting things out there that are false. 

Like the the alleged 156 charges he went to jail for...charged but not convicted and that is the cold hard fact.  Do your research and did you know posting someone's criminal record is an offence....just so you know.

stop using that corp number its getting old man

stop trying to pretend your a lawyer

getting caught stealing at walmart pretty impressive lol

stealing peoples id and trying to get credit cards sent to your exs place isnt cool idiot

hooking up internet for people in fake companies names is illegal too lol

Jonathan Watson and to those who reponded.

In the first rebuttal by me it clearly showed an email of 2 payments made and that at the point Jonathan Watson along with 4 other people showed up at my door (that's right 4 other people all caught on video) not just Jonathan Watson as he alludes to.

Jonathan Watson is a web designer who utilizes godaddy or other sites internal "flash" or "predesigned" templates to create websites (for what I seen him do) and he created a website for Brian Markle (Elliott and Browne) for which to my knowledge still hasn't been paid (or has he?).  Mr Watson did in fact sign a legal agreement with Mr Markle and it clearly states that Mr Markle did pay Mr Watson.

It would appear Mr Watson who is unemployed simply is looking for "money" and to be honest entering into any agreement with the person is NOT advisable.  

As one poster stated I am paying $720 for the tv...not quite...I am pay $600 plus interest for the tv.  The tv at the time was about 1 month old and because of his financial situation we both agreed that I would by the tv at what he paid since I was going to get one through Easy Home and be paying about the same.

The first payment was and second payment was paid to him directly as he was there.  The reason behind the "bank account" was he was supposed to and far as I know was moving to Toronto which the bank account would make sense.

Would it make sense to tell him no I am not paying you direct but I am going to put into your bank account when the person is right there in front of you? of course not....but that is exactly Jonathan

Watson is stating to everyone.   "its not in my bank account" what he does with the money once I hand it to him is really none of the business.  Did he take the money and put into his account (don't know), did he by gas for his car? did he spend it on take out food? did he spend on cigarettes? Again don't know don't care but filling up a car, buying cigarettes and going to Burger King ect...wouldn't take long for $60 to be spent...cigarettes $9, Burger King $8 and gas $40....you get the idea.

There is no question that 2 payments were made, I am not saying but Mr Watson clearly states in email PAYMENT RECEIVED.  Then 3 days after acknowledging of receiving the payment Jonathan was at my door looking for the tv...

Why because he didn't want to continue with the agreement...well sometimes we all make agreements that latter we which we didn't but that's life....if you make an agreement with the bank to buy a car and the bank said ok but at 29% interest later you found out that another bank would have done it but at 19% you would regret entering into that agreement but you are now stuck with that agreement....

Do I regret the agreement with Mr Watson, yes I do, but nothing I can do but Mr Watson also signed an agreement with me for which he owes money on so now I bill him...not monthly an invoice which I have deducted the balance owed and wrote off the rest just to end all agreements.

Mr Watson if he doesn't agree can take me to court and we can let a judge decide whats fair or not.  If a judge says pay him I will have the money right then and there but until that time....I am happy that Mr Watson received some money, my invoice is paid (sort of) and no futher dealing with him...

JUST SO EVERYONE KNOWS JONATHAN WATSON and MR MARKLE  are linked and this could be yet another attempt on MR MARKES part (BRIAN MARKLE AKA ALEX MARKLE) to ruin my name and integrity in the community for his manipulative and deceiptful ways so he doesn't have to take responsibility or to shift in order for him to CREATE ANOTHER BUSINESS like he is doing in OTTAWA

Interesting thing is hes the one who wrote down the monthly payment cost on the television, and he's the one who slammed a door in my face when I sent him an email prior stating i was due to non-payment. If he was any decent person he would have a) talked to me the day he rejected my presence or b) emailed me saying he can't make payments instead of essential running off with an unpaid item. That's like me leasing a vehicle and going to Mexico because I can't make payments.

No response Mr. Goble...I guess that what happens when you find yourself trapped in your lies

As soon as I had seen any actions that were actually in collections, I probably would have written it off. But, unfortuneatly, I was by this agency asking for physical evidence of an amount. Which apparently wasn't provided. Nothing of this nature was discussed with the 'transaction'of the television. Is it written in the agreement? I am not in the wrong for this, and you know this. So, stop wasting your time on this, because this case is not over. I also found some more things out about your personal vendetta's of your past. Cheers.

This report was authored by Jonathan Watson.  While in a business atmosphere we have had little dealings.  With that said Mr. Watson approached my services to commence collection perceedings against a company in Ottawa owned and operated by E.B. the CFO of the the business.  His claimed dealt with a non payment issue.  Naturally services cost money and retaining my services are no different. 



The TV he speaks of was a 32 in flat screen purchased by him at a local electronics store.  He in fact used the TV for about 2 months.  Due to financial stressor I agreed to purchase the TV on a monthly payment scheme.  However, he was all to aware that there were cost on conduct the collection matter on his behalf.  Where nothing was done in a particular month a $60 payment would be tendered.



The first payment was in fact made and have a receipt to establish that.  To date I have accrued about $800 in fees for various filings and hours.  Naturally I have taken the FULL value of the TV from his outstanding invoice owed to me.



Secondly and what this person hasn't advanced in any way is he directly accused me of stealing the TV and threaten to report it to the Police.  Now the agreement he has shown clearly identifies a civil transaction.  This would get anyone angry when in fact nothing was stolen.



On April 6, 2011 Mr. Watson was asked by another person to appear on his behalf in court (acting as agent) however, he failed to do so because he alleges that he was coerced not too.  With that said Mr. Watson then brought these individuals from the Court who he claims threaten him to my building complex.   Mr. Watson is captured on video driving and parking his car in a matter that he beleived would not be detected by video surveillance.  Thankfully video shows his car passing through the intersection and parking his car off screen.



Then it shows Mr. Watson coming to the apartment.  About 5 minutes later the individuals from the Court who Mr. Watson clams threaten him come running and barging into the apartment. (THIS IS IN FACT ADMITTED BY JONATHAN WATSON IN EMAIL).



On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Jonathan Watson <j.watson8610@gmail.com>

wrote:



Court Attendancepursuing any action on your behalf would be illegal in front of a judge, so I

didn't pursue"



Group of 3: Later after reviewing paperwork, and was asked/requested to have the three ask for a visit to let you know that they will be taking things up with you civilly, I eventually after being asked 4 times agreed to this. It was stated that the only way you would speak with them was to have me go through. I was unaware of the actions of 'running up stairs' or

'barging doors wide open'. I was only told that things would try to be discussed ...



Jonathan F. Watson, Graphic & Web

Designer





I received the payment , i was not accusing you of anything. Anyways,

take care.





On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Jonathan Watson <j.watson8610@gmail.com>

wrote:



Dear Trevor,

  

You have not made the first payment for the television...It looks like I will

have to reposes this item. Sorry.

--

Jonathan F. Watson, Graphic & Web

Designer



So the 2 emails above establishes that (1) a payment was in fact made and (2) that he was involved in an incident at my residential complex.



I am delighted to inform everyone that Mr. Watson is attending court to testify against these individuals and he is "manning" up to tell what happened.   So kudos for him on that but it doesn't undermine the fact he did bring these people to the complex and he was fully aware of the court proceedings against them.



I am reminded of the old addage "those who live in glass houses should never throw rocks".  While Mr. Watson is certainly entitled to an opinion he has to look at the global picture.  He owes myself for services RENDERED but choses to only look at one side.



So Mr. Watson are you going to pay me for the limited services I performed and continue to provide.



TREVOR GOBLE