X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now
Ripoff Report | Trustpilot Review - , Internet - Trustpilot joakim
Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1043744

Complaint Review: Trustpilot - Internet

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Mjolnir — Copenhagen Internet
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Trustpilot Internet United States of America

Trustpilot Joakim Ditlev Trustpilot guilty of breaking consumers trust on Wikipedia, Internet

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Answer to anonymous hater

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Click here now..

Trustpilot a company that champions itself as the trusted name in consumer reviews seems guilty of editing their own wikipedia page. Joakim Ditlev, Trustpilot's specialist in PR and reputation management, has been painting a pretty rosy picture of Trustpilot on Wikipedia as user Jokked while removing any negative information about the company, whether it is true or not. So much for Trust, Trustpilot!

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/16/2013 02:19 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/trustpilot/internet/trustpilot-joakim-ditlev-trustpilot-guilty-of-breaking-consumers-trust-on-wikipedia-inter-1043744. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
0Consumer
1Employee/Owner

#1 REBUTTAL Individual responds

Answer to anonymous hater

AUTHOR: Joakim - ()

POSTED: Monday, April 22, 2013

Joakim here,

Thanks for your personal attack. I don't receive those very often, but unlike other people I'm not afraid to post things in my own name. That helps you address your hate, so I hope you appreciate my openness.  

I can only recognize one true thing in your claim. I did edit the Wikipedia page using that username. What I also did was removing a couple of biased sentences lacking cites and neutral language. Ive also been updating that page with cited facts a couple of times. Last time I checked these things are requirements for any Wikipedia article and that behavior is not breaking any rules.
If you think an article is biased, Wikipedia has some excellent ways to discuss that. For some reason neither you nor other haters use that functionality in this case.   

Your ability to hunt the man rather than the target is second to none. However, if you or other people have doubts about my trustworthiness, I do prefer to learn that from someone, whos not shouting out loud while hiding behind mummys skirts.

Ill be happy to discuss this further. You are welcome to contact me - jod(at)trustpilot(dot)com
/Joakim

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.