UNITED AUTONET SEAN NIA-OWNERJOEY VILLEGAS-SALESPERSON Deceptive Trades Act violation/rip off/impairment of inspection san antonio Texas

We filed a Deceptive Trades Act Law Suit against Auto Net out of Dallas Texas several years ago. Yes, it took quite some time but Auto Net settled out of court because they knew they would loose much bigger if placed before a jury of people that hate lying, cheating automobile dealerships! i can provide court case number and a photo of the check that shows settled amount.

So, with the settlement (that was sub-optimal) but we sold the junk truck "as is"  Our buyer was a diesel mechanic, looking for parts, fully looked over the truck and we provided all our paperwork showing the magnitude of  problems with this "junk truck". So, with the settlement and the sale of the truck, our loses were minimal.  I encourage all others "ripped off" by auto net to pursue legal counseling, it may cost you in the beginning but they will loose in the end!

Follow up on my original complaint regarding Auto Net out of Dallas , Tx. and the Deceptive Trades Act Law.  They settled out of court because they new they would loose big time if facing a Jury of people that hate lying cheating automobile dealerships! I can provide court case number and a copy of their check if needed! 

You need to get the inspection reports from the DMV inspection department not from clean air check. theres does not show the protocol numbers. they have an office in garland texas here in the DFW area. once you have them get them to check the protocol number on the reports and see if they match your vehicles protocol number. this is the best proof you will get and the best way to void the as is warranty. RCA inspections is there go to for illigal inspections. i have one other here on rippoff that has done this and found RCA did theres as well.

PLEASE EVERY ONE WRITING ABOUT AUTONET GET WITH THE DMV INSPECTION DEPARTMENT AND CHECK YOUR VEHICLES PROTOCOL NUMBER AGAINST THE PROTCOL NUMBER ON YOUR REPORTS.

Then you have some major ammunition to sue. but dont just list united autonet inc in your suit yopu want SHAHIN MOHAMMAD NIA listed to. if you have a attorney let him know you want to pierce the corporate veil and go after his personal assets. the guy just bought an $800,000 house in irving. it worth going after him personaly. have him served at 200 hunt dr irving texas75062 or 2675 tarna Dallas texas 75229. you will need the secretary of state to serve him.

Lets hit him with multiple cases.

 Yep, This piece of trash continues to rip off, lie and deceive people. Everyone needs to get together with a class action lawsuit and take this piece of trash out a business. Thank you for the info, will pass this on to my attorney. My lawsuit is going on a year and a 1/2 and they have responded to very little. They think we're backing down , think again! They'll be ruined one way or the other!

I AM SORRY TO HEAR YOU TO HAVE BEEN LIED TO AND STOLEN FROM BY THIS WORTHLESS ENTITY. BUT POSSIBLY IF YOU HAVE THE DMV INSPECTION DEVISION RUN YOUR VIN# AND CHECK THE INSPECTION REPORTS YOU MAY FIND LIKE ME THEY HAD THE INSPECTION DONE ILLEGALLY. HAVE THEM CHECK THE PROTOCOL NUMBER ON THE REPORTS AND SEE IF THEY MATCH YOUR VEHICLE. IF RCA STATE INSPECTIONS DID THE INSPECTION YOU MOST LIKELY HAD A FRAUDULANT INSPECTION DONE.

IF IT WAS DONE WHILE AUTONET HAD THE VEHICLE. THE AS IS WARRANTY IS VIOD AND YOU SHOULD JOIN ME IN A SUEING THIS PILE OF YOU KNOW WHAT. SHAHIN NIA UNITED AUTONET. HE IS ALWAYS OUT OF THE COUNTRY WHEN YOU TRY AND CALL HIM. MAYBE HOMELAND SECURITY SHOULD LOOK INTO HIS CORPORATION.

 While I understand your frustration with the situation, its unfortunate because even you state the obvious. Its an AS IS purchase. If this was your childs first vehicle why didnt one of YOU go with him as a parent who has purchased vehicles before? Why did you let your child go and spend roughly 10 grand on a vehicle WITHOUT giving your child the benefit of YOUR life experience? When I purchased my first vehicle I had not only my parents but my grandparents and a few uncles along. They are the ones that showed me what to do and to look for. They are the ones that instructed me about having the vehicle looked over by a trusted mechanic BEFORE you put ANYTHING down. Its NOT about TRUST, its about protecting your wallet. Had your child taken the USED VEHICLE to a trusted mechanic BEFORE the purchase then your child wouldnt be in the situation they are in NOW. Its unfortunate but since your child did this AND signed paperwork to the effect of they agreed to purchase the vehicle AS IS. SInce this deal is with YOUR CHILD, YOU PERSONALLY do not have a right to defame them as EVERYTHING you post is HEARSAY!!! Other then that we only have YOUR WORD that the situation has unfolded as YOU claim it has. But YOU offer ZERO PROOF OF WRONGDOING!!!! So HOW can anyone put any credibility to YOUR tale? All YOUR POST is, is PURE defamation!!! Something that there IS a civil remedy for THEM!!! And YOU did this WILLINGLY and WITH MALICE!!! Oh, sure YOU CLAIM that you are warning others but we all know that is an excuse to WHINE!!! We can all see WHAT you are doing by THIS STATEMENT ALONE........ I offered to keep my mouth shut if they would go half......Right there YOU show the TRUE motive for making a post that is filled with this much DEFAMATION!!!I commend you for being a supportive parent but its a little too late for that since YOU should have gone with them to make the purchase. YOU should REALLY be careful on what YOU post on the web. There are real life consequences for what YOU do online. If that dealership or person YOU have named in your post wants to, THEY can sue YOU for what YOU have willingly posted. Since THIS SITE is NOT Facebook, all YOU have done is place a nice fat bullseye on yourself. AS IS means AS IS and YOU attempting to circumvent this by making threats and defaming online posts goes ONLY to show that YOU think its perfetly OK to step on another citizens rights. We get it, YOU dont agree with what YOUR CHILD purchased. It still doesnt give YOU the right to name them online and basically LIE about the situation. There are always three sides to ANY tale. YOU are telling YOUR VERSION of it and we KNOW its NOT the whole truth. If YOU were NOT there then YOU cant say with 100% accuracy that what YOUR child told YOU is the ACTUAL truth of the situation. By the time your lawyer gets to your situation it will be far beyond the timeframe to do anything about it. Even your lawyer is going to tell you that your child signed the paperwork for AS IS and ANYTHING your child CLAIMS was said is a HE SAID situation. Because both YOU and YOUR CHILD would say and now proven DO anything to get your way.