United Parcel Company of America consumer fraud ripoff deceptive company political corruption Atlanta Georgia *UPDATE

Public comments about United Parcel Service Co

Comment from This Code of Business Conduct sets forth standards of conduct for all representatives of UPS Oct 21,02 07:16PM



About the Code

This Code of Business Conduct sets forth standards of conduct for all representatives of the UPS enterprise, including employees and agents of UPS and its subsidiary companies. Throughout the Code, "UPS" is used to refer to the enterprise as a whole, to each person within it, and to any person who represents UPS or any part of the UPS organization.



The Code provides information about our standards of integrity and explains our legal and ethical responsibilities. It does not address every specific situation or set forth a rule that will answer every question. Rather, it is intended to provide guidance on our responsibilities and assist employees in making the right decision. Additional requirements are set forth in detail in various individual compliance programs developed by functions with appropriate expertise and training. It is each employee's responsibility to understand which compliance programs apply to his/her area of responsibility and to manage the business accordingly. The Code supplements and enhances the UPS Policy Book and is consistent with the UPS Policy Book.



The Code is one of many tools provided as part of the Business Conduct and Compliance Program to assist us in meeting our legal and ethical obligations. Other tools include the UPS Compliance Standards and Procedures Manual, the UPS Help Line, and various individual compliance programs. It is your responsibility to use these resources, to ensure proper training for those employees who report to you, to ask for guidance when needed, and to report violations to the Company.



Because the Code discusses both our legal and ethical responsibilities, non-compliance with certain aspects of the Code and/or the Business Conduct and Compliance Program could result not only in disciplinary action, but may also subject the individual offender and the Company to civil and/or criminal liability.



This Code was developed through the combined thinking of many individuals within our organization - employees at all levels and in all parts of the organization contributed ideas through surveys, focus group meetings and informal input. To continue to encourage comments and suggestions, the last page of this Codeprovides information about submitting recommendations for improvement, mirroring the long-standing tradition of the UPS Policy Book.



The UPS Charter and the UPS Policy Book

The Code should be used in conjunction with other available resources. Many of these resources are referenced throughout the Code. The UPS Charter, UPS Policy Book, and UPS Code of Business Conduct should be used as guides in your daily work. Each of these resources reflects our responsibilities to our four constituencies: people, customers, shareowners, and communities, and when used together, will help to align your actions to meet the needs of those four constituencies. To ensure a complete understanding, we encourage discussion of the UPS Charter, Policy Book, and Code at business meetings and other suitable occasions.





Go to this site read my problems with UPS



http://hometown.aol.com/fayetteww/myhomepage/index.html



email address W W Fayette fayetteww@aol.com



NOW READ THIS. Mr Eskew is speaking





CHAIRMAN'S MESSAGE: ON LEADING WITH INTEGRITY



Leading with integrity is not new to UPS managers. In 1957, Jim Casey said, "We have become known to all who deal with us as people of integrity, and that priceless asset is more valuable than anything else we possess."



Maintaining that reputation is vital to our continued growth and success. As a UPS employee, you have an obligation to make sure your daily decisions support the values and principles of the company.



We have always been committed to managing our business in compliance with both the law and our ethical values. Our sincere and firm belief that we will only conduct business fairly, honestly, and ethically has been the foundation of our legacy of leading with integrity.



As we continue to integrate deeper into our customers' supply chains, the level of trust between UPS and our customers also extends deeper. It would be a mistake to assume that just because our business is growing more competitive and complex that we would give less thought to how specific results are achieved. We care as much about how we get results as we do about getting the results. Employees who get results at the cost of violations of laws or through unscrupulous dealings do more than violate our standards - they challenge our ability to grow our business and undermine our reputation.



If any aspect of the Code is unclear to you, or if a situation ever arises that raises in your mind a question about legal or ethical compliance, it is your personal responsibility to communicate this concern to the company. It is very important to all of us that employees are never discouraged from using any available channel to communicate their concern to the company. It is also important that employees who communicate concerns to the company are supported, and that they are able to do so without fear of retaliation or retribution.



Leading with integrity is about creating a climate for success. It's about creating an environment where good people can make good decisions. By ensuring understanding of our legal and ethical responsibilities, by conducting our business in compliance with those obligations, by using good judgment and by respecting each other, UPS's legacy of leading with integrity will continue. The UPS reputation belongs to us all, as does our responsibility to protect it.



Michael L. Eskew

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



"Integrity comes down to being the way we operateOur integrity requires us to live up to our commitmentsnot just for technical compliance, but to the spirit of the guidelines that we've agreed on."

George Lamb, 1982

Subj: Willard W. Fayette W. W. F. Sketchy Circumstances HMMMMM this has to be a lawer. My answer and a question or two.



No Name Today N. N. T Sketchky Circumstances



Willard W. Fayette W. W. F. : Sketchy Circumstances HMMMMM this has to be a lawyer for UPS or the ACDM, and I will treat it accordingly.



N. N. T: Rebuttal Entered: 7/9/2002 Modified: 7/9/2002

Im sorry to hear that you incurred os much damage to your priceless artwork. you would think UPS would handle a $150,000 dollar package with greater disciplne.



W W F: I agree. You understand then lawyer man that I did insure my Art Work for $155,000.00. They took the money, but when it came time to pay for the damage a, all I get is no way hozay. Wont even discuss it with me. What do you think of that? Fraud maybe? Yes, Fraud there is no question in my mind. "Corporate Fraud."



N N T: What I find hard to believe is that you would let "joe tapegun" and "Susan bubblewrap" pack your PRICELESS ARTWORK. Did you watch them pack it.



W. W. F. Yes I did.



N N T: Did you include a prepaid airbill for the return of your artwork?



W. W. F. No. Museum is paying.



N. N. T. And if so, did you include the insurance?



W W F No Museum is paying



Otherwise, if the musuem paid for the shipping, they may not have included the insurance.



N. N. T. That was not smart to let such expensive artwork to be packed in the hands of underpaid mail-box waxers.



W. W. F. Yes not smart.



N. N. T. You should have spent the extra time and gotten it professionally packed and you wouldnt be having this problem.



W. W. F. I agree in a way, but I did spend the money with Mail box, Etc., as the professional packer. They were referred to me by Gregg Buttermore my contact man at the museum as being professional. Bear in mind I was invited to show my art work at the museum. I had only shown my work once before in 1996 at the Petersen Automotive Museum in Los Angles California. Transporting them was a problem, as I was quite concerned about damage at that time while they were enroute to the museum so a good friend of mine hand carried them to the Petersen at the Petersen's expense. The Petersen in turned paid my friend to transport them back to me in Ferndale WA



Anyhow this worked out well for me, so when Gregg Buttermore invite me to show my work at the Auburn Cord Duesenberg Museum in Auburn Indiana in January of 1998, I asked him how to transport them. He wrote me a letter with instructions as how to do it, and I followed his instructions. I was not smart enough at that time and did not realize that the corporations were a bunch of crooks and the people that worked for them were of the same caliber. They were just not honest people. Especially Gregg Buttermore at the museum and Grant VanHorne the museums lawyer. As I understand it (Bailment) is enough in law. It basically says that if I loan something of mine to somebody "it is there obligation to return it to me in the same condition that I had loaned it to them. this did not happen. They would not repair them they will not pay me for them and they wont talk to me about them. O K lawyer I answered your questions and will send you all the proof you need to let you see, that I am an honest man and am willing to communicate with somebody as to what the Museum and UPS owe me for damages. So now get in touch with me. You don't have to hide under the cloak of this web site'



W W (Bill) Fayette W. W. F.



No Name Today-- N. N. T. NO SYMPATHY!!!



W. W. F. A lawyers reaction to the truth. That's about it. "NO SYMPATHY!!!*******Whatever turns you on lawyer********

Subj: Willard W. Fayette W. W. F. Sketchy Circumstances HMMMMM this has to be a lawer. My answer and a question or two.



No Name Today N. N. T Sketchky Circumstances



Willard W. Fayette W. W. F. : Sketchy Circumstances HMMMMM this has to be a lawyer for UPS or the ACDM, and I will treat it accordingly.



N. N. T: Rebuttal Entered: 7/9/2002 Modified: 7/9/2002

Im sorry to hear that you incurred os much damage to your priceless artwork. you would think UPS would handle a $150,000 dollar package with greater disciplne.



W W F: I agree. You understand then lawyer man that I did insure my Art Work for $155,000.00. They took the money, but when it came time to pay for the damage a, all I get is no way hozay. Wont even discuss it with me. What do you think of that? Fraud maybe? Yes, Fraud there is no question in my mind. "Corporate Fraud."



N N T: What I find hard to believe is that you would let "joe tapegun" and "Susan bubblewrap" pack your PRICELESS ARTWORK. Did you watch them pack it.



W. W. F. Yes I did.



N N T: Did you include a prepaid airbill for the return of your artwork?



W. W. F. No. Museum is paying.



N. N. T. And if so, did you include the insurance?



W W F No Museum is paying



Otherwise, if the musuem paid for the shipping, they may not have included the insurance.



N. N. T. That was not smart to let such expensive artwork to be packed in the hands of underpaid mail-box waxers.



W. W. F. Yes not smart.



N. N. T. You should have spent the extra time and gotten it professionally packed and you wouldnt be having this problem.



W. W. F. I agree in a way, but I did spend the money with Mail box, Etc., as the professional packer. They were referred to me by Gregg Buttermore my contact man at the museum as being professional. Bear in mind I was invited to show my art work at the museum. I had only shown my work once before in 1996 at the Petersen Automotive Museum in Los Angles California. Transporting them was a problem, as I was quite concerned about damage at that time while they were enroute to the museum so a good friend of mine hand carried them to the Petersen at the Petersen's expense. The Petersen in turned paid my friend to transport them back to me in Ferndale WA



Anyhow this worked out well for me, so when Gregg Buttermore invite me to show my work at the Auburn Cord Duesenberg Museum in Auburn Indiana in January of 1998, I asked him how to transport them. He wrote me a letter with instructions as how to do it, and I followed his instructions. I was not smart enough at that time and did not realize that the corporations were a bunch of crooks and the people that worked for them were of the same caliber. They were just not honest people. Especially Gregg Buttermore at the museum and Grant VanHorne the museums lawyer. As I understand it (Bailment) is enough in law. It basically says that if I loan something of mine to somebody "it is there obligation to return it to me in the same condition that I had loaned it to them. this did not happen. They would not repair them they will not pay me for them and they wont talk to me about them. O K lawyer I answered your questions and will send you all the proof you need to let you see, that I am an honest man and am willing to communicate with somebody as to what the Museum and UPS owe me for damages. So now get in touch with me. You don't have to hide under the cloak of this web site'



W W (Bill) Fayette W. W. F.



No Name Today-- N. N. T. NO SYMPATHY!!!



W. W. F. A lawyers reaction to the truth. That's about it. "NO SYMPATHY!!!*******Whatever turns you on lawyer********

Subj: Willard W. Fayette W. W. F. Sketchy Circumstances HMMMMM this has to be a lawer. My answer and a question or two.



No Name Today N. N. T Sketchky Circumstances



Willard W. Fayette W. W. F. : Sketchy Circumstances HMMMMM this has to be a lawyer for UPS or the ACDM, and I will treat it accordingly.



N. N. T: Rebuttal Entered: 7/9/2002 Modified: 7/9/2002

Im sorry to hear that you incurred os much damage to your priceless artwork. you would think UPS would handle a $150,000 dollar package with greater disciplne.



W W F: I agree. You understand then lawyer man that I did insure my Art Work for $155,000.00. They took the money, but when it came time to pay for the damage a, all I get is no way hozay. Wont even discuss it with me. What do you think of that? Fraud maybe? Yes, Fraud there is no question in my mind. "Corporate Fraud."



N N T: What I find hard to believe is that you would let "joe tapegun" and "Susan bubblewrap" pack your PRICELESS ARTWORK. Did you watch them pack it.



W. W. F. Yes I did.



N N T: Did you include a prepaid airbill for the return of your artwork?



W. W. F. No. Museum is paying.



N. N. T. And if so, did you include the insurance?



W W F No Museum is paying



Otherwise, if the musuem paid for the shipping, they may not have included the insurance.



N. N. T. That was not smart to let such expensive artwork to be packed in the hands of underpaid mail-box waxers.



W. W. F. Yes not smart.



N. N. T. You should have spent the extra time and gotten it professionally packed and you wouldnt be having this problem.



W. W. F. I agree in a way, but I did spend the money with Mail box, Etc., as the professional packer. They were referred to me by Gregg Buttermore my contact man at the museum as being professional. Bear in mind I was invited to show my art work at the museum. I had only shown my work once before in 1996 at the Petersen Automotive Museum in Los Angles California. Transporting them was a problem, as I was quite concerned about damage at that time while they were enroute to the museum so a good friend of mine hand carried them to the Petersen at the Petersen's expense. The Petersen in turned paid my friend to transport them back to me in Ferndale WA



Anyhow this worked out well for me, so when Gregg Buttermore invite me to show my work at the Auburn Cord Duesenberg Museum in Auburn Indiana in January of 1998, I asked him how to transport them. He wrote me a letter with instructions as how to do it, and I followed his instructions. I was not smart enough at that time and did not realize that the corporations were a bunch of crooks and the people that worked for them were of the same caliber. They were just not honest people. Especially Gregg Buttermore at the museum and Grant VanHorne the museums lawyer. As I understand it (Bailment) is enough in law. It basically says that if I loan something of mine to somebody "it is there obligation to return it to me in the same condition that I had loaned it to them. this did not happen. They would not repair them they will not pay me for them and they wont talk to me about them. O K lawyer I answered your questions and will send you all the proof you need to let you see, that I am an honest man and am willing to communicate with somebody as to what the Museum and UPS owe me for damages. So now get in touch with me. You don't have to hide under the cloak of this web site'



W W (Bill) Fayette W. W. F.



No Name Today-- N. N. T. NO SYMPATHY!!!



W. W. F. A lawyers reaction to the truth. That's about it. "NO SYMPATHY!!!*******Whatever turns you on lawyer********

Subj: Willard W. Fayette W. W. F. Sketchy Circumstances HMMMMM this has to be a lawer. My answer and a question or two.



No Name Today N. N. T Sketchky Circumstances



Willard W. Fayette W. W. F. : Sketchy Circumstances HMMMMM this has to be a lawyer for UPS or the ACDM, and I will treat it accordingly.



N. N. T: Rebuttal Entered: 7/9/2002 Modified: 7/9/2002

Im sorry to hear that you incurred os much damage to your priceless artwork. you would think UPS would handle a $150,000 dollar package with greater disciplne.



W W F: I agree. You understand then lawyer man that I did insure my Art Work for $155,000.00. They took the money, but when it came time to pay for the damage a, all I get is no way hozay. Wont even discuss it with me. What do you think of that? Fraud maybe? Yes, Fraud there is no question in my mind. "Corporate Fraud."



N N T: What I find hard to believe is that you would let "joe tapegun" and "Susan bubblewrap" pack your PRICELESS ARTWORK. Did you watch them pack it.



W. W. F. Yes I did.



N N T: Did you include a prepaid airbill for the return of your artwork?



W. W. F. No. Museum is paying.



N. N. T. And if so, did you include the insurance?



W W F No Museum is paying



Otherwise, if the musuem paid for the shipping, they may not have included the insurance.



N. N. T. That was not smart to let such expensive artwork to be packed in the hands of underpaid mail-box waxers.



W. W. F. Yes not smart.



N. N. T. You should have spent the extra time and gotten it professionally packed and you wouldnt be having this problem.



W. W. F. I agree in a way, but I did spend the money with Mail box, Etc., as the professional packer. They were referred to me by Gregg Buttermore my contact man at the museum as being professional. Bear in mind I was invited to show my art work at the museum. I had only shown my work once before in 1996 at the Petersen Automotive Museum in Los Angles California. Transporting them was a problem, as I was quite concerned about damage at that time while they were enroute to the museum so a good friend of mine hand carried them to the Petersen at the Petersen's expense. The Petersen in turned paid my friend to transport them back to me in Ferndale WA



Anyhow this worked out well for me, so when Gregg Buttermore invite me to show my work at the Auburn Cord Duesenberg Museum in Auburn Indiana in January of 1998, I asked him how to transport them. He wrote me a letter with instructions as how to do it, and I followed his instructions. I was not smart enough at that time and did not realize that the corporations were a bunch of crooks and the people that worked for them were of the same caliber. They were just not honest people. Especially Gregg Buttermore at the museum and Grant VanHorne the museums lawyer. As I understand it (Bailment) is enough in law. It basically says that if I loan something of mine to somebody "it is there obligation to return it to me in the same condition that I had loaned it to them. this did not happen. They would not repair them they will not pay me for them and they wont talk to me about them. O K lawyer I answered your questions and will send you all the proof you need to let you see, that I am an honest man and am willing to communicate with somebody as to what the Museum and UPS owe me for damages. So now get in touch with me. You don't have to hide under the cloak of this web site'



W W (Bill) Fayette W. W. F.



No Name Today-- N. N. T. NO SYMPATHY!!!



W. W. F. A lawyers reaction to the truth. That's about it. "NO SYMPATHY!!!*******Whatever turns you on lawyer********

Im sorry to hear that you incurred os much damage to your priceless artwork. you would think UPS would handle a $150,000 dollar package with greater disciplne.



What I find hard to believe is that you would let "joe tapegun" and "Susan bubblewrap" pack your PRICELESS ARTWORK. Did you watch them pack it? Did you include a prepaid airbill for the return of your artwork? And if so, did you include the insurance?



Otherwise, if the musuem paid for the shipping, they may not have included the insurance.



That was not smart to let such expensive artwork to be packed in the hands of underpaid mail-box waxers. You should have spent the extra time and gotten it professionally packed and you wouldnt be having this problem.



NO SYMPATHY!!!



Here are some packing tip:

Packing Tips

Im sorry to hear that you incurred os much damage to your priceless artwork. you would think UPS would handle a $150,000 dollar package with greater disciplne.



What I find hard to believe is that you would let "joe tapegun" and "Susan bubblewrap" pack your PRICELESS ARTWORK. Did you watch them pack it? Did you include a prepaid airbill for the return of your artwork? And if so, did you include the insurance?



Otherwise, if the musuem paid for the shipping, they may not have included the insurance.



That was not smart to let such expensive artwork to be packed in the hands of underpaid mail-box waxers. You should have spent the extra time and gotten it professionally packed and you wouldnt be having this problem.



NO SYMPATHY!!!



Here are some packing tip:

Packing Tips

Im sorry to hear that you incurred os much damage to your priceless artwork. you would think UPS would handle a $150,000 dollar package with greater disciplne.



What I find hard to believe is that you would let "joe tapegun" and "Susan bubblewrap" pack your PRICELESS ARTWORK. Did you watch them pack it? Did you include a prepaid airbill for the return of your artwork? And if so, did you include the insurance?



Otherwise, if the musuem paid for the shipping, they may not have included the insurance.



That was not smart to let such expensive artwork to be packed in the hands of underpaid mail-box waxers. You should have spent the extra time and gotten it professionally packed and you wouldnt be having this problem.



NO SYMPATHY!!!



Here are some packing tip:

Packing Tips

Im sorry to hear that you incurred os much damage to your priceless artwork. you would think UPS would handle a $150,000 dollar package with greater disciplne.



What I find hard to believe is that you would let "joe tapegun" and "Susan bubblewrap" pack your PRICELESS ARTWORK. Did you watch them pack it? Did you include a prepaid airbill for the return of your artwork? And if so, did you include the insurance?



Otherwise, if the musuem paid for the shipping, they may not have included the insurance.



That was not smart to let such expensive artwork to be packed in the hands of underpaid mail-box waxers. You should have spent the extra time and gotten it professionally packed and you wouldnt be having this problem.



NO SYMPATHY!!!



Here are some packing tip:

Packing Tips