Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #517808

Complaint Review: Wet-Media, Inc. - Tucson Arizona

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: John — Los Angeles California USA
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Wet-Media, Inc. 120 S Houghton Road Suite 138 PMB 191 Tucson, Arizona United States of America

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

This report pertains to the aforementioned website run by Wet-Media, Inc. located in Tucson, Arizona. This website has violated numerous social, legal, and ethical standards in its actions, speech, and activities. There were several examples of each violation, both directly targeted at me and also discovered through discussions with other members, and I will attempt to categorize each violation into broader categories below.

1) Numerous members of the website have been the victims of racially-bigoted remarks and verbal assaults on this website. Whether it be blatantly and publicly on display in other members' profiles, or directly at victims in private emails or by phone, these racist attacks by other members occur to the degree that some members now accept them as a "given" with regards to this website, and most have stopped complaining to the website's owner due to the owner's inaction against the perpetrators, and the owner's own retaliatory actions against the complaining individuals especially when the complaining individuals protest the unfair treatment by the owner. The website refuses to remove openly racist remarks and racist jokes on the website, and refuses to even address or discipline the members who made them. There are a number of examples, which I and other members have been involved in or witness to, in which the website owner and other members not only blatantly violated the rules set forth in the website's User Contract, but also violated our basic civil rights as consumers and individuals. The owner not only consistently refused to denounce or confront such behavior when it is brought to his attention, he condoned it. There are incidences of "non-white" members calling or writing the headquarters in Arizona to complain of verbal and written harassment and abuse by "white" members on the website, and as a result the "non-white" members' accounts were suddenly terminated with a false declaration to the victim, "At your request, your account has been terminated." This occurs even when the harassing member (the original subject of the complaint) never requested that the victims' memberships be terminated, and never even complained of the victims to anyone at headquarters. In other words, the accounts of non-white victims who had never violated any contractual or legal agreements were arbitrarily being terminated by the owner of the website (aka "pigmaster) based solely on his own perception of the situation, and without even brief interviews with either party. And there are numerous instances in which, after one single complaint to the owner by a white member about a non-white member on the website, the non-white member's membership was terminated almost immediately, without any attempt by the owner at inquiry into the non-white member's side of the situation. The owner's bias and favoritism was obvious in multiple instances, and regardless of who initiated the complaint with the owner (regarding a conflict involving a "white" and "non-white" member), the "non-white" member consistently ended up being the one disciplined and ultimately terminated from the site. When the terminated members called to inquire as to why and on what grounds their accounts were terminated, instead of receiving any answer, they were instantly and repeatedly hung up upon.

2) The aforementioned website is also involved in the illegal activity of promoting prostitution and illegal drug use, despite the website's User Contract clearly stating its intolerance of such activity. This website has specialized areas, devoted to the advertisement of the services of escorts and prostitutes to the site's members. This website also promotes illegal drug use, and actually has a question in members' profiles which asks if they "party" and use drugs, as an overall means for the facilitation of illicit drug-using members to find and connect with others that do as well. This website glorifies the contraction of HIV/AIDS, and openly encourages members to advertise and engage in "conversion" parties, in which HIV+ men will attempt to convert HIV- men to HIV+ status.  During these parties, the victim (or victims) may be either a willing participant, or completely ignorant as to what is really going on. Closely tied to these parties is the "party" culture (having sex while under the influence of drugs). In these parties, the victim is drugged and/or encouraged to partake in the use of illicit drugs, both of which facilitate the infection and seroconversion of the victim. The website actually has a specialized area for members to advertise such parties, and also made special attempts to forewarn its members to be more discrete about their advertisements, searches, and communications related to partying and playing ("pnp"), as the website was apparently coming under increasing scrutiny for its condonement and encouragement of these activities. All of the above continues to the present, and this website apparently serves as a conduit for numerous illegal activities, including the sale and distribution of illegal substances, in addition to those mentioned above.

3)  The aforementioned website, as stated above, arbitrarily terminated the memberships of non-white members, even when these members had never violated any contractual agreements or legal statutes. This website also engaged in deceitful and illegal tactics targeted at its complaining consumers, both to mislead and discourage the consumer from successfully filing a report, and also to retain monetary payments from the consumer even after the consumer had unfairly been terminated from the website. There are multiple reports in which a non-white member simply lodged a complaint with the owner regarding written and verbal bigotry and harassment by another member (who happened to be white). In these cases, the complaining member was purposefully given false and misleading information regarding who to complain to, i.e. "You'll have to call back in a few days since the owner is out of town, when the owner was actually in the office, and "You need to file a complaint with the police and not with us," when the complaint was clearly one arising from the website and not one of judicial legality. In addition, the complaining member's fully-paid membership also was suddenly terminated with refusal by the owner to give any reason or grounds for the termination. Worse yet, in these cases the owner refused to refund any of the pre-paid membership fees, which seems to be a blatant violation of consumers' rights, since the consumer never violated any website regulations in these cases, and the termination of the consumers membership was arbitrarily performed by the websites owner without any substantive grounds. There are a number of instances where the member then called the headquarters, both to inquire as to why their membership was suddenly terminated, and also to request a refund for the upcoming pre-paid month. These requests were not granted, and the terminated accounts continue to be non-refunded. (I can personally attest to these events occurring, as I was the victim in one of these cases). In all cases, the caller was hung up upon. With subsequent attempts to call, members were either hung up upon again immediately, or were rerouted to simply music, and after approx 2-3 min of music, the caller was hung up upon and the line went dead.  The caller was never given any further opportunity at that time to speak with an employee or representative of the website, and was never given an option to even leave a voicemail message. Several members (myself included) have directly asked the "pigmaster", the owner, if he and his website condone racial bigotry and the harassment of members-of-color on his website, and he consistently either refused to answer the question, or simply answered "no comment" and hung up. In one of my personal interactions with him, I too tried to confront and address the seemingly racially-based assymmetry with which he treated and acted towards members of varying ethnic backgrounds. He refused to answer my inquiry, and hung up on me and immediately terminated my account. In subsequent emails, he additionally refused to refund any money which had already been withdrawn from my credit card (which was to be used for upcoming months). In addition, he refused my repeated demand for earlier-requested copies of emails saved under my account on the website, which would have served as proof and examples of these racially-motivated attacks and harassing emails of which I have described at great length, and which the website consistently condoned. What initially caused me to become suspicious of any discriminatory behavior by the website and its owner, was a discussion with a friend of mine who happens to be Caucasian. He had emailed a complaint to the website's owner, citing abusive speech and harassment by another member (who happens to be of a non-white ethnic background). The owner wrote back to my friend profusely apologizing, and with extremely polite and professional speech, went on to state that this matter would be taken care of. Sure enough, two days later when my friend checked online to see what had become of his complaint, he found that the harassing member (who happened to be non-white) had been permanently banned from the website. My friend (who is Caucasian) stated to me that he felt badly and confused, since he had never requested that the other member be terminated from the site (he was assuming the other member would only be reprimanded), and also because he was never called upon by the owner to provide any further information or even proof about his earlier accusation. Please note that this is in sharp contrast to my own complaint to the owner about harassment by another member (who happened to be white), and the termination later that day of MY account. As in the previously described case, the owner made no attempt to garner further information or insight from me or from the other member about whom I was complaining, and subsequently refused to give me any explanation whatsoever as to why it was me being terminated, rather than the other member who was the subject of the complaint. My requests for at least a refund of my membership costs were repeatedly ignored.

4) The owner of this website also arbitrarily edited and censored the profiles of its members and after extensive observation, when related to issues of racist remarks or racially-prejudiced sentiments, it became obvious that the owner selectively censored the profiles of non-white members.  For instance, white members continue to be allowed to include pejorative and offensive remarks directed towards other ethnic groups clearly and publicly displayed in their online public profiles. This is common throughout the website, despite the website's User Contract clearly stating to all members (and which all members must agree to),

"...You will not use the Service to restrict or inhibit any other user from using and enjoying the Internet; you will not use the Service to post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, slanderous, racist, ageist, or defamatory information, advertisements, pictures or communications that contain offensive language or images of any kind, including without limitation any transmissions constituting or encouraging conduct that would constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or otherwise violate any local, provincial, state, national or international law; you will not use the Service to post, or transmit any information or software which contains a virus, cancelbot, Trojan horse, worm or other harmful component; you will not use the Service to distribute, promote or otherwise publish any material containing any solicitation for funds, advertising or solicitation for goods or services, except within specific circumstances as deemed appropriate at our sole discretion; you will not use the Service to post advertisements or other information that, at our discretion, are deemed by us to be an insincere or otherwise non-serious use of the Service; you may not use the Service for any unlawful purpose or to promote any unlawful activity...."  

However, when non-white members (myself included) attempted to protest racist remarks by stating so in our own profiles, our submitted profiles were edited and re-written without any notice to us whatsoever by the owner. Any mention of anti-racist protest was often omitted arbitrarily by the website staff prior to posting. I have personally called headquarters and questioned "pigmaster" as to why racist harassment was tolerated on his site, when the User Contract clearly states that this type of behavior would not be allowed. The owner refused to answer me and after I repeatedly asked him the same question (why racist harassment was being tolerated on his website") he then hung up on me. I personally have proof also that
the "pigmaster" refused to release any hardcopies of past emails in which a non-white member was verbally assaulted with bigoted rhetoric by a white member. When it was explained to the owner that the member was requesting this documentation as a paying consumer and in order to investigate whether ones rights as a consumer and individual had indeed been violated on his website, the owner not only refused to reprimand or give warning to the offending member, the owner also refused to grant the complaining member the requested documentation and the member was hung up upon. The member's membership to the site was immediately terminated without explanation, and the member was immediately shut out of the site, thus preventing the member from logging in and salvaging any saved documentation of any wrong-doing by the site or by any of its members.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/31/2009 11:06 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/wet-media-inc/tucson-arizona-85748/wet-media-inc-barebackrtcom-website-business-involved-in-illegal-activities-discrimina-517808. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
15Consumer
2Employee/Owner

#17 Consumer Comment

Really? I have not had that experience!

AUTHOR: Roger - ()

POSTED: Saturday, July 12, 2014

First I would like to say that I am a member of BBRT (barebackrt.com) and have been for over a year, and the last 8 or 9 months I have been a contributor (paid member). I also have a friend that is a contributor on bbrt, and has never had a problem with customer service nor tech support.

 

Escorts are not prostitutes, Escorts do not charge for sex they charge for their escorting (companionship) services, and yes their profiles tell their likes and dislikes sexually, however they are not selling sex, they are simply expressing their likes and dislikes sexually just like all the other guys on there. So there may be some escorts on there that are also including the sex in the price of their escort services, but there is no way to prove it, and they do not put that on their profile!

 

And not to mention, none of that is relevant anyway, because it is all clearly stated in their terms of service that you agreed upon when you signed up as a member. If you don't like their terms of service, no one said you had to join their service, simply move on to a site that you can agree with their terms of service, it's that simple, no reason to stress about it. And obviously your states attorney general agrees that there is nothing illegal going on because your AG didn't do anything, and if did they feel such illegal activities was going on they would have contacted the FBI and the FBI would have shut the site down, and obviously the FBI hasn't shut it down, I know I'm still a paid member and was just their about 1/2 hour ago!!

 

Besides why would you want to be a member of a site you dislike so much? And also how would you have any clue as to whether or not someone else has been able to retain their account, when you cannot even log-in? Idiot! As far as Ex employees, well, ex-employees have always bashed companies when they leave unless they only left for a better opportunity, But the funny part is, when they worked for that very same company, they always say and think it's the greatest thing since sliced bread. And the pic that was posted proving the site was established in 2007, well, I can take any pic and edit it so it looks the way I want it, including replacing text, so that pic means nothing, now if you had an actual video of the screen showing the live website on the video, that might be a little more believable, besides what difference does it make when he said the company started, maybe the guy misspoke, haven't you ever misspoke?

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#16 Consumer Comment

Legalty of information

AUTHOR: Long Beach Consumer - (United States of America)

POSTED: Sunday, April 11, 2010

Interestingly enough, within the rebuttals provided, one states how it is illegal for "pigmaster" to place what he calls "personal" information about the complainant, John, on this site, towit, his email, and that he, as "pigmaster" alleges, used bbrt to "solicit meth."  Then he goes on to provide the same information about the webmaster ("pigmaster").  If it is illegal for the webmaster to place that information in his rebuttal, then too it would be for anyone else to place it; however, it is not, at least not criminally.  Further, to survive a civil claim of defammation, there would need to be specific identifying information, including full name, picture, or some other direct linking means to the direct individual ("John" and "Johnnie" are not prima facie evidence for this.  I personally know 12 men named John.)  Next, direct harm would have to be shown.  Since the first cannot be met, direct harm cannot be proven.  Third and finally, consequences related directly to the reporting of the accusation would have to be shown (i.e., "I was fired from my job because my employer thought I was a drug user after having read this.").  Again, since the first AND second cannot survive, the third would never be reached.  So, legal action, not likely.  A first year law student could get it dismissed for lack of a cause of action.


Now, directly with the website itself.  I am a current and existing member of the site.  I have seen the racsim go both ways.  I personally politely tell anyone I am not interested in that I am not.  If they do not get the clue from there, I block them.  While some individuals choose to use wielding tones in their profiles, most do not.  I have seen minorities wield libelous statements just as much as I have Caucasians.  Regarding the harassment, well, there is the block option.  Even at best if it were limited to paying members, since all of the people complaining here have complained that they could nto get a refund, it stands then to reason that they paid for the site and thus could use that option.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#15 Consumer Comment

Johnnie (above) aka pigmaster aka owner lying about his identity

AUTHOR: Matt M. - (United States of America)

POSTED: Saturday, January 23, 2010

     What I find sad and pathetic, besides the prior "commentator" who is the actual owner of the website pretending to be somebody who just "happened to be surfing the web and who states he came across this site", is the owner's inability to accept that the evidence, against his "company" and proving his illegal activities as of late, is insurmountable and he knows it.  He is unable to come up with any independent proof of his own to make any type of claim that I or any of the other commentators (or ex-employees) are lying.  Yet, I have come up with at least four indisputable hard copies of evidence that Pigsnoutface has indeed lied on several occasions on this very website.  "Johnnie" (above) coincidentally has all of the similar spelling and grammatical errors  that Pigmaster on the website has.  What he claims as "similar writing styles" among numerous different inidividuals is simply CORRECT GRAMMAR.  He might want to look into that someday.
     In my independent report files on his corrupt website and company, I have more than proven that Pigsnoutface does indeed repetitively lie, and appears to desperately try to come up with a different sorry lame excuse in a lame attempt to divert attention away from his guilty self.  If one looks on the website, one would see that an ex-member would be fined $1500 for attempting to illegally re-enter the site, or to lie about his own identity.  So my question is, if all Pigsnoutface states is true, then why have I not yet been contacted to pay the $1500 fine?  I challenge this corrupt, guilty individual to try to collect.  Let me answer that question.  Pigsnoutface knows very well that 1) all he says are lies, and thus he has no grounds to even try to fine me and 2) he knows that if he even tried, then all of the facts about his illegal activites and corrupt behavior which I've previously stated would come pouring out to the public, and he knows that I can prove each and every one of them.  I have documented proof that he lied to me when I was a member in order to steal my membership money (and I know of other members to whom he's done this as well).  I can prove he lied about when his company was started to pretend that his ex-employee was fake, when indeed this ex-employee does exist.  I can easily get in contact with other ex-members of the site which would corroborate all of the other allegations against him, including the fact that he divulges fake information about his company over the telephone when directly asked. These ex-members can also prove that he's violated internet legal policies by creating and lying about his ex-members in order to attempt to gain personal revenge.  I and other can easily prove that he's used his website to blatantly lie in order to steal money from his members, and then arbitrarily blocks them out of the website.  The list goes on and on. 
     So pigsnoutface, the owner who engages in illegal activities and belongs in jail, should feel free to simply TRY to come at me with a ffine, which should have already occurred if what he states is true.  The reason that he's scared to even think of coming my direction with any hint of a fine is because he knows that everything he's said on here is a flat-out lie, and he knows that all I and other members have said is true.  He knows that if he tries to fine me or any other ex-member, we'll simply have our legal counsel go forward with all of our documented evidence against him, and he would only be digging his own grave.
     I'm surprised with all of this owner's neglecting of his own business (if you can call it that), he still has yet to find the other reporting bureaus that I and other ex-members have reported his website on, and he only likes to lie on this one.  Although he's not bright at all, so that would explain his cluelessness in discovering that much is being reported about his site on other online modalities.  This owner remains just as whiny and pathetically lazy as ever.  Does he know that a tragedy in Haiti has taken place, and I sincerely wonder if he's even bothered to donate any money towards Haiti's recovery, rather than use it towards his drug use.  I have a wonderful idea:  He should take all of the money he's stolen from his ex-members through his site, and donate it ALL to the American REd Cross or UNICEF.  He'll have to look all of this up I believe. 
     One more time, if what he said was true, I directly challenge his guilty a*s to even think twice about trying to hit me up with any type of fine.  That's a direct challenge, pigsnoutface.  You'll end up in jail, and with fines of your own instead, so.....I'm not worried one bit.  Bring it.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#14 Consumer Comment

Just an observation.

AUTHOR: Johnny - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, January 16, 2010

I just happened to be browsing through complaints here on Ripoff Report, which I do from time to time when I can't sleep or have nothing else to do. After reading this report and all of it's rebuttals, It became painfully obvious that "John" (the person that wrote the original complaint) is also "Kevin", "Dean", "Chris", "Anonymous - Ottawa (Canada)" and, "Matt M.". This is easily detected as they all share the same writing style, use the same vocabulary and they all have the same lack of common sense.

It seems to me that the majority if not all of the accusations that are being directed to Wet-Media or their website are completely unsubstantiated and lack any merit whatsoever. I highly doubt the validity of any of these claims, in fact many of them are nothing more than a childish bout of name calling. In all likelihood the only reason this complaint was ever filed was to attack, discredit and ruin the reputation the website, the parent company and it's owner.

It is really to bad that claims can be made on this website without having to provide any valid proof that an injustice has been committed. I mean really, if any of the claims of prostitution, drug dealing or plotting to spread the HIV virus were true the FBI, ATF and local authorities would have put a stop to this a some time ago. It is people like you that ruin sites like Ripoff Report and other similar sites. These sites are here to provide a safe and convenient way post legitimate complaints and issues in hopes of getting some help in resolving your issues with a company that you have conducted business with. They were never intended to be a safe-haven for people like you to bash, humiliate or otherwise defame a company, business or owner/employee of that business or orgination that you have that you have a grudge with. This is exactly why people do not take the claims made here seriouslly, because you can never tell if it is a justified complaint or if it is just some moron with a p***k up his a*s (like you).

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#13 UPDATE EX-employee responds

Owner confusion worsens

AUTHOR: Anonymous - (Canada)

POSTED: Thursday, January 07, 2010

I had to laugh when I read that pigmaster stated that he didn't start his business until 2008, and as a result, I was some sort of imposter. No, I really do exist. And his website was definitely developed YEARS before 2008. So either he's lying, as usual, which he did almost pathologically even in the workplace. Or the drugs finally affected what memory he had left and now he's completely gone off the deep end. I can attest to the drugs definitely affecting his personality, because as the website became more well-known, he started 'using' more heavily and became more and more of an a--hole, both to the website users and to his staff. And he would lie about the stupidest things, not only to us on staff but even to the business supervisors and officers. I won't go into detail again about the illegal activities he engaged in using the business as a cover, except to say that the rate of these also increased as the website became better-known. I applaud you all for holding this crook accountable. I feel badly for the people still having to work with him, and maybe worst of all for his current customers.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#12 Consumer Comment

Hard copy file which illustrates the owner is lying again

AUTHOR: Matt M. - (United States of America)

POSTED: Sunday, January 03, 2010

I am attaching a picture file which refutes the owner's claim that this ex-employee who came forward with testimony is a fake.  The owner of this website claimed that the ex-employee is not a legitimate or credible individual, because this ex employee claimed that he/she worked for wet media from 2007-2008, and quit her job with this company because of all of the unscrupulous and illegal activities which were taking place under the guise of Wet media inc.  The owner's argument to challenge the ex employee's testimony was that his company and website were not yet even in existence in 2007, and thus this ex employee was lying.  Attached is a capture file of the owner's website which illustrates and proves not only the full functionality of the website in 2007, but also proves that the owner is again lying in another desperate attempt to hide the facts and the truth. 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#11 Consumer Comment

Here is proof that the owner is once again lying.

AUTHOR: Matt M. - (United States of America)

POSTED: Sunday, January 03, 2010

The website's ex-employee stated that he/she worked for the company Wet Media from 2007-2008.  The owner attempted to invalidate this ex-employee, stating that the website and Wet Media did not even exist yet in 2007.  Attached is a picture file taken directly from the website which proves that not only was the website in full functionality during 2007, but also proves that the owner is once again lying, and distorting everything claimed against his website and company.  This, in my opinion, illustrates how anything and everything the owner attempts to state as fact can't be trusted or believed.  

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#10 Consumer Comment

Pigmaster needs to cut down his drug use. He's getting confused.

AUTHOR: Matt M. - (United States of America)

POSTED: Sunday, January 03, 2010

The "owner" of the "company" (and I use those words extremely loosely; I would prefer to use the words "felon" and "website which fronts for illegal activities") is apparently allowing his well-established drug abuse to cloud his memory.  If one simply logs onto the website, one sees how long certain members have foolishly been giving money to this criminal.  And if the owner would stop lying and cheating his consumers long enough to look at his own website, he would see that certain members indeed have been members since 2007.  And I would bet that the preparation of this so-called website business started much prior to this time, and necessitated the help of numerous individuals to get the site up and running (yes, these individuals would be EMPLOYEES).  I highly doubt that pigmaster had nearly enough intelligence to develop the site on his own.  I believe it was during this time that Pigmaster was well-involved with his white-supremacist hate groups, as I've seen the photos of him with the n**i uniform at various rallies during the 2006-2007 time period. 

Allow me to state the irony which is hovering over the "owner's" incorrect retort to the employee's remarks.  The owner specifically told me to send in money for membership dues (as stated before), and upon receiving my money, he not only lied and stated that he never received it (he only admitteds it after I caught him in his lie with the help of certified mail), he promptly terminated my account with ABSOLUTELY no reason or rationale whatsoever.  Now here comes the irony.  I spent a good part of that day emailing and calling wet-media, inc. headquarters trying to either clear up the "confusion" or to get my money back.  Guess what?  That was four days ago, and I never received any reply via email or telephone.  In fact, after calling several times that day and never having anyone pick up the phone, the office workers and the owner simply hung up on me after one ring.  I still have yet to receive my refund, or any explanation as to why my money was stolen from me, and why my account was terminated.  Even more sinister, the owner purposely waited until he received my payment, and almost within the hour he received it, he terminated my account.  And now I have no access to or record of any communications on the site.  I can't even access the site now.  Yet, pugmaster is able to whip out a response (albeit incorrect) within hours of any posting on this site.  Perhaps if pugmeister would focus his attention on his own website, instead of pathetically waiting for any posting on this site, his website wouldn't be so screwed up, although that still wouldn't change the fact that pughead is a cheat, a fraud, and a criminal.  So pughead, fix your own d**n business first.  You've lost all credibility and you're just making an a*s of yourself on here.  You cheated me out of my money, and this is the only way I can communicate with you, cause you won't reply to any of my inquiries.  Yet you obviously love this site, ripoffreport.  Get your priorities in order, then turn yourself into the police.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#9 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Ex employee from 2007?

AUTHOR: Wet-Media - (United States of America)

POSTED: Friday, January 01, 2010

Funny how we can have an ex employe that worked for our company before it even existed. And en ex employe that worked for us in 2008 before we even hired any employees.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#8 UPDATE EX-employee responds

"Steve" needs to get his names straight

AUTHOR: Anonymous - (Canada)

POSTED: Friday, January 01, 2010

I am an ex-employee of Wet Media, and I knew it was only a matter of time before the company would have to start going on the defensive for its transactions.  I was employed by this company from 2007-2008.  I eventually quit because I knew it would only be a matter of time before the feds or some law enforcement agency raided the company's headquarters because of their shady dealings.  This corporation Wet Media, Inc. literally lies and steals from its members, and arbitrarily terminates members' accounts sometimes just because they file a single complaint with the management.  I still communicate with certain employees of wet media, and apparently this activity has escalated to the point that this company seriously needs to be investigated by federal and international officials for corruption and theft.  This corporation also needs to be investigated for fraudulent claims and outright lying to authorities about their dishonest transactions.  I know for a fact that this Steve character does not exist, and instead is a fictitious person made up by the company, and I also know after speaking with employees still working for this company that this Doctor they accused of wrongdoing is totally not involved in this entire fiasco, and that Wet Media simply needed a scapegoat to divert attention away from their own corrupt practices.  Apparently, this member complained about something entirely unrelated, and the company tried to exact retaliation by pulling this innocent member into this separate situation and accusing him of things he had absolutely no involvement in.  So Steve aka Wet Media now is guilty of slandering certain individuals, on top of their countless other unscrupulous and illegal activities.  All I can say is that I'm glad I got out when I did,  But the administration which runs wet media inc. is literally the scum of the earth when it comes to business transactions, and the sooner this company is exposed and shut down, the better.  For my own protection, I am remaining anonymous, since members of this corporation have been known to personally exact revenge on ex-employees and ex-members alike.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#7 Consumer Comment

Hmmmmm.... An interesting observation...

AUTHOR: Chris - (United States of America)

POSTED: Wednesday, November 11, 2009

I'm a current member of barebackrt.com, and I'll just leave it at that.  Like the site cause it's really easy to hook up on, but gotta be honest and back up the first dude's report.  The management treats the members like s**t, and my jaw has hit the ground on several occasions when I heard the way "Pigmaster" spoke to several of my friends on the phone (yeah, all non-caucasian dudes) when I happened to be present.  Just hearing him through the phone receiver from a distance, I could still hear how rude and condescending he was being to the friend who happened to be calling in with the unfortunate pre-existing condition that he wasn't white.  And he does literally hang up on the callers almost every single time whenever the call is regarding a complaint about the site. This is a business?  And I've gotta admit that when I've called once or twice about some glitch with my billing cycle, "Pigmaster" dude was a total kiss-a*s to me, which really makes me sad cause that means he really is a racist guy, and definitely should not be able to own or run a public website and discriminate against certain people behind the scenes, and hide by just hanging up on the ones who refuse to take this type of treatment.  


Barebackrt also did have the prostituion "grids" which escorts could fill out and include their prices and availabiity, and the website even had a way for the prostitution grid of each escort to be directly linked to the escort's personal profile.  One-stop shopping, I guess.  And I literally snorted milk up my nose when I saw "Pigmaster" pretending to be outraged at a member's supposed drug use (Dean, you're right....that was illegal for him to write that about an old member), when it's a well-known fact that Pigmaster and all of his buds are hardcore drug addicts and actually traffic the stuff to each other across the entire country and abroad. Who said hypocrisy was a dying entity?  

Perhaps what shocked me the most about seeing this exchange, however, was how Wet-Media, Inc, a supposedly "professional"  and credible business, had no rebuttal except to spout nothing but vitriole and cheap personal attacks which were being actively pulled out or one of their asses.  Nice tangent there, btw, but uh, let's try to stick to the RELEVANT information here.  But most significantly, i believe, is the fact that multiple members have come forward now with the consensus that support the original allegations against Wet-Media and barerbackrt, and yet the only rebuttals have been from the owner(s) and employees of the company, who all have huge personal stakes in this company's survival.  But also notice that the company remains unable to defend itself against these claims, and has definitely damaged itself more than anything else by displaying really lame, inappropriate (I agree illegal), and UNPROFESSIONAL conduct when placed under the tiniest hint of scrutiny.  And yet, this company happily withdraws money from our accounts every month, and still somehow sees fit to speak to and treat its members like crap, and refuses to grant any refunds even when it's the website's owner who's f**ked up, and not our fault.  We should just boycott and move on to the next hook-up site du jour. My money's on Wet-Media resorting to paying randoms to post rebuttals and do their dirty work for them.  They're all cheats and liars anyway.  Is it really true then that Pigmaster is a n**i and White Supremacist?  I'd heard the same thing...
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#6 Consumer Comment

Wet-Media Inc. and barebackrt.com have got to rank among the companies most LACKING any semblance of professionalism and decency.

AUTHOR: Dean - (United States of America)

POSTED: Tuesday, November 10, 2009

I was browsing this website ripoffreports and came across this complaint about barebackrt.com, and I felt compelled to put my two cents in.  I am an African-American gay male who joined barebackrt.com in 2008.  Initially, it seemed like any other hook-up website, except for a few strange questions in the member profile questionnaires and some odd areas of the website itself.  Reading over "John's" complaint about Wet-Media, Inc, I've gotta say that for the most part, I agree with what he said.  


As a black man on this website, I was amazed at the high level of tolerance of anti-minority statements made in members' public profiles, which the management seemed to turn a blind eye to.  I think I saw in one profile that blacks need not apply unless they didn't have that "musky smell."  And it's pretty well-known among all of the members that if you call or write "Pigmaster" for any type of assistance, you're pretty much going to get some type of passing of the buck (it's not his problem, thus I should go find help elsewhere), apathy, and unprofessionalism with attitude.  I mean, just reading over the "rebuttals" by the owner and employees of this "company," it's seriously like they're 1st graders taking cheap shots because they have no ammunition or leverage to back themselves up.  And for the owner of this business to reveal private information of one of its previous members as a form of retaliation is actually a felony, I believe. So if "John" is reading this, I would say that you have a solid civil liberties violation case pre-packaged and ready to go against this company.  Remember, Wet-Media Inc and barebackrt.com, YOU are the ones running a business, so you are required to abide by the standards set forth by edicts and laws of the state and federal government.  We as consumers have no such responsibility.  Hence the saying "The customer is always right."  However, here it seems that the customer has numerous valid claims (which I myself have witnessed on your website), laid out his complaints in a well-organized and thoughtful formal assertion, and cited several examples to back up each claim.  Your attempts to respond were embarrassingly primitive and lacking in any substance whatsoever.  You have no arguments of defense, nor do you have any examples or items of evidence to point to anything to the contrary.  And to make matters worse for you, in an attempt to hide your lack of ability to deny the claims against you, you regress to 1st grade and yell out vindictive personal attacks against this ex-member which have absolutely no relevance to what the original complaint contained. 

You should realize that, in addition to the numerous violations of legality committed through your website, you have just committed several more with your rebuttals here on ripoffreport, most of which could easily and successfully be litigated in a civil suit or class-action lawsuit.  You are also doing your own company a disservice by confirming John's claims about how unprofessional and devious your corporation apparently truly is.  Having previously been a member of your website, i too can assert that yes, your website does promote prostitution/escorting (your website even provides a template for escorts to fill out which lists their prices and daily availability).  Your website also has members openly speaking of engaging in illicit drug use, many of whom are your personal "buddies" on your buddy list, and yet how hypocritical of you to make statements regarding this topic about a member who you obviously hold personal anger and resentment towards.  For instance, many members and ex-members of your site all have heard that you are a member and supporter of several white supremacist and neo-n**i groups here in the U.S.  I've personally heard this from numerous sources.  Now if I as a member of the website were to publicly claim that you are after hearing these exact same claims by many other members, this action is not a crime.  As a consumer, I have every right to publicly voice concern about a company dealing in illegal or dubious activities, in an attempt to warn other members and to discover the truth.  Now what YOU did, which was you as the owner of a company using confidential and questionable information, distorting it, and publicizing it to personally attack a former consumer and to divert attention away from yourself, is clearly something done for the purpose of pure malice, and obviously not out of concern for the greater population. Truth be told, I have been witness to or a victim of almost every assertion made in the initial claim about your site.  You've personally hung up on me at least two or three times when I called Wet-Media with a complaint.  You've also been incredibly rude in your answers in your responses to my past emails, even when I was asking just a simple question. Your employees have blatantly lied to me on several occasions as well.  In fact, you also refused to refund my membership dues, even after I pointed out that I was discontinuing my membership because of the toxic environment of your website and also the refusal of certain members to adhere to the decency contract on your site and your company's refusal to address the associated harassment of other members.  
With all of those strikes against you, to have you now act so inappropriately, vindictively, and illegally will truly ultimately lead to the demise of your business.  It is not your place as a professional business to salvage your deteriorating reputation by launching personal attacks against your ex-members.  Yes, I am a lawyer, and after witnessing the company's acceptance of racial slurring on your website, I simply discontinued my membership.  However, after seeing your attempts to deny what truly is going on on your website by personally attacking a whistleblower, I believe I may perform some additional investigation into what other violations your website is guilty of, and file a complaint of my own.  You and your staff obviously need to look up the definition of professionalism and perhaps buy a book or two regarding cultural sensitivity and how not to commit illegal acts.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Oh he's back, now with his boyfriend

AUTHOR: Wet-Media - (United States of America)

POSTED: Monday, November 09, 2009

John, I see you now have your boyfriend posting here.


Incase your wondering why your latest account "manhandle" was also terminated it was because you 1) were previously banned from the site for soliciting for meth, which is illegal, 2) because as soon as you crated your account you began sending out hatfull email quoted here.

"Sent from IP address 99.22.205.110

Date: Mon 11/09/09 03:43 PM
Well look who's here.  It's the pansy-assed racist bigot who's too chickenshit
to back his trashy mouth up.  When did you finally come out of hiding, you
f**kin' troll?  At least now you realize that you're nothing but an ugly-a*s
red-necked trailer-park piece of white trash with a pencil d**k.  f**kin'
reject.  You know my bud would've kicked your a*s within two seconds if you had
any balls to mouth off to his face.  Thing is, u should still be in hiding.  Do
the world a favor."
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Consumer Comment

Kevin and John are wacked

AUTHOR: Steve - (United States of America)

POSTED: Monday, November 09, 2009
Amazing, Dr. John Whang and his boyfriend kevin are both schizophrenic meth heads, the scary part is one of them is a medical doctor, last I remember at California hospital. I only hope they wised of to his schizo traits and fired him. bbrt was smart to terminate both of them. They are both racist bigots that spread lies when they don't get their way. 
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Consumer Comment

I agree with the original complaint about this site. It is racist and is involved in illegal practices.

AUTHOR: Kevin - (United States of America)

POSTED: Sunday, November 08, 2009

I am a Caucasian ex-member of the website Barebackrt.com, and I completely agree with  "John", the individual who originally complained about this site.  I am an EX-MEMBER, because I also found it obvious that the owners of this site seemed to violate their own contractual agreement which claims to have absolutely no tolerance for any racist statements or sentiment, and yet even I as a White Gay Man was disgusted by the overt discrimination displayed by the owners of this site and of its parent company Wet Media.  I find it extremely interesting that the two "rebuttals" prior to mine have absolutely no evidence or examples to back up their statements, and seem to think that simply stating that so-and-so is a tweaker thus negates all of the clearly stated evidence which the original filer of this complaint has organized and set forth in his statements.  The "dark-skinned" Black man as he claims himself to be who is an employee of Wet Media would obviously defend the company he works for.  In a recession, who would want his employer to suddenly go out of business?  This person should not even be allowed to file a rebuttal since his impartiality is obviously non-existent, with him being employed by the subject of the complaint. And the irony in all of this is that I can back up that this site does indeed attempt to promote illegal drug use and the spread of the HIV virus, and in fact glorifies it.  I also agree with the original report that the owners do in fact use any excuse possible to terminate members who happen to not be Caucasian, and bend over backwards to favor and cater to its Caucasian members.  This website violates its own contract with its members on a daily basis by blatantly allowing members to be completely abusive to the men of color on this site, and I also have heard accounts from numerous non-Caucasian members of this website about unfair termination, repeated refusals by the staff to speak to the members in their attempts to clarify as to why their memberships are being terminated without any reason, and also how this website will refuse to refund any membership dues even after this site had arbitrarily decided to end certain memberships (funny how these events always tended to victimize non-Caucasian members).  I think that this is how this website tries to maximize its profits.  Finally, I just got so disgusted by the blatant promotion of illegal activities on this site, the mistreatment of its ethnic-minority members, and the unprofessional behavior of the Wet Media staff, I quit this website because staff that treats its members so offensively based on their ethnicity, and engages in illegal actions and self-righteously pretends that its members do (but are only too happy to continue to take money from them), is a business that DESERVES to be boycotted and hopefully shut down. 
I'm glad that somebody finally spoke up about Wet Media.  And to the idiot who called the filer of this report a tweaker and drug-user, uh, reading the original filer's complaint which is organized, eloquent, clear, and appropriately detailed, and then reading yours which sounds like you've got the pipe literally hanging out of your mouth, just reminds me of the hypocrisy of you lying for your company which (ahem) is your breadline in this ever-increasingly poor economy.  Before you continue lying for your bosses, check your conscience. And if you indeed are who you claim you are, as a member of the parent company whose website I just checked, which member of the Board of Directors are you?  Or are you some token intern which the Board put you up to in order to attempt to gain some artificial street cred in this feeble lame attempt to deny what is blatantly true.  So if you've got both Men of Color and Caucasian Men getting progressively disgusted with your website and its overt racism, perhaps it's time for you and your bosses to find another line of work.  I hear that white supremacy groups are back in vogue amongst the stupid and illiterate.  Why don't you all start with that?  And if you want more evidence how offensive your website really is, I can easily enlist the help of 20 or 30 other individuals (other equally disgusted ex-members) and have them also file complaints with your website as well.  Difference would be that WE'RE not lying. 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 UPDATE Employee

This is SO not TRUE

AUTHOR: Barebackrt.comEvents - (United States of America)

POSTED: Sunday, November 01, 2009

I am a black man a very Dark Skinned BLACK MAN and I have been working for wet-media for almost a year now. I have seen this guy on Adam 4 Adam and he is a tweeker. Every word that he had typed has been an complete lie. Wet-Media is one of the most gracious companies to work for, I have never EVER experiences any of the nonsense that this man it talking about. I think he need to put the pipe down, for him to say that Adam 4 Adam is being investigated, where is he getting this crazy nonsense from? It sad that in this day and age that someone could and would make up such bull. THE MAN NEEDS HELP !!!!!

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 UPDATE Employee

Loony Toon

AUTHOR: Wet-Media - (United States of America)

POSTED: Saturday, October 31, 2009

This member was terminated and banned from our site for sending out hate mail and soliciting for crystal meth. He also called into our support line posing as the ACLU, CNN, and a lawyer.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now