Complaint Review: Epson America, inc - LONG BEACH CA
Ripoff Report on CBS 19
Ripoff Report on CBS 19 - Global Marketing Alliance
Ripoff Report on ABC 15 - Smart Shopper
Ripoff Report - Girls Gone Wild
Ripoff Report on Fox 11 - Car Repair
- Author Confirmed
Epson America, inc Sold me an inkjet printer that will not allow use of third party cartridges in violation of Federal Law. LONG BEACH CA
*Consumer Comment: Read it again, George
*Consumer Comment: That is not what it said.
Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
A Supreme Court decision (Impression vs Lexmark) dated May 31, 2017 stated that it was illegal for a manufacture to produce a product that (in this case) prevented the use of remanufactured cartridges (both ink and toner).
BUT Best Buy sold me an Epson XP-640 inkjet printer on January 14, 2018 in violation of the Supreme Court decision.
Two weeks later the printer locked up saying I was low on ink. Remanufacted (cost effective) cartridges would not work.
Best Buy told me that I needed to buy outrageously priced Epson cartridges.
A subsequent complaint filed with the Iowa Attorney General, File #2018-211865, conveyed the complaint to Epson America.
Epson's resent response baceically says: "Tough - you should have read the box the printer came it".
Don't buy Epson or any other printers that rip you off on replacement costs!
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/07/2019 02:55 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/epson-america-inc/long-beach-ca-90806-2469/epson-america-inc-sold-me-an-inkjet-printer-that-will-not-allow-use-of-third-party-cartr-1474901. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
#2 Consumer Comment
Read it again, George
AUTHOR: coast - (United States)
SUBMITTED: Friday, March 08, 2019
You are incorrect. The 5/30/17 Supreme Court ruling stated that a company such as Lexmark cannot use patent law to stop other companies, such as Impression, from refurbishing and reselling their branded cartridges. How do you interpret that as a law that forbids a manufacturer from manufacturing printers that are incompatible with the refurbished cartridges?
#1 Consumer Comment
That is not what it said.
AUTHOR: CARTER - (United States)
SUBMITTED: Friday, March 08, 2019
The ruling does not prevent a company from manufacturing system to prevent refills. It does however prevent them from seeking legal action against companies that remanufacture cartridges.
It deals with patents, and with the ability to enforce a patent. It doesn't in no way make it illegal to make a printer that has mechanism to prevent remanufascturing. It allows a company to remanufacture an already used cartridge. IT DOES NOT allow people to make new generic cartridges. IT DOES NOT effect the rights of the manufacturer to build restriction into the product that make it difficult ot impossible.
You would know that if you read any decent summary of the ruling.
Related Reports
01:07 PM
07:10 AM
08:25 AM
10:17 AM
12:10 AM
10:49 PM
10:25 PM
01:51 PM
09:48 PM
New Updated Rebuttal Photo 
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.
