Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1470651

Complaint Review: Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C. - Oklahoma City OK

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Frustrated Ex — Woodward United States
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C. 6621 N. Meridian Ave. Oklahoma City, OK United States

Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C. Left off Ex in Summary Judgment Oklahoma City OK

*Consumer Comment: Sorry

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Received a notice that I was being sued.  My ex husband received one as well.  I had 20 days to  file my written petition, which I did with the divorce decree showing where my exhusband took all liability for the vehicle and debt that was later reposessed.

The divorce decree states that my ex shall assume and pay in full the debt and obligation and hold me harmless from any and all actions taken by a third party (Love, Beal & Nixon P.C. in this case) with regard to the debt.  Lots of legal language that I thought covered me in this case. 

I did not receive a response stating that I didn't have a case, not even a go f*** yourself or anything until I received a letter from them stating they would settle for 60% of the debt and then another one stating they would settle for 50% of the debt. 

I did not once accept the liability for the debt and then I receive via mail that they have filed a motion for summary judgment and now have to appear in court.  This Notice of Hearting is addressed "as to MY NAME only". 

Does not include my exhusband in this hearing and as of today he has not received a notice for a hearing.  To my understanding all I can do is file contempt of agreement against my ex husband and hope the judge rules in my favor before they try to garnish my wages or freeze my accounts. 

Why do they even put that wording in a divorce decree that is signed and filed by a Judge of the Court of Law if it doesn't even protect you? 

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/02/2019 01:14 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/love-beal-nixon-pc/oklahoma-city-ok-73116/love-beal-nixon-pc-left-off-ex-in-summary-judgment-oklahoma-city-ok-1470651. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#1 Consumer Comment

Sorry

AUTHOR: Robert - (United States)

POSTED: Thursday, January 03, 2019

This is one of the hazards of Divorce.

Does not include my exhusband in this hearing and as of today he has not received a notice for a hearing.
- He hasn't received one and won't receive a notice.

To my understanding all I can do is file contempt of agreement against my ex husband and hope the judge rules in my favor before they try to garnish my wages or freeze my accounts.
- For all intensive purposes that is correct. However, realize that again it may not stop the garnishment or action against you. It just gives you the opportunity to get a judgement against your ex. Where if it is considered contempt it may be a bit more serious as to the penalties with your ex.

Why do they even put that wording in a divorce decree that is signed and filed by a Judge of the Court of Law if it doesn't even protect you?

This is a basic misconception. Unfortunatly a Divorce Decree does NOT absolve your responsibility to a debt in the eyes of the creditor. The basic reason is that a judge can not arbitrarily transfer responsibility without giving the creditor the chance to contest the action. Unless the creditor was notified during the divorce and agreed to the change, you are the one who is still legally responsible for the debt. Your "protection" comes in the form of the action you can take against your ex.

If you have not already done so, I would highly suggest you contact an attorney, especially if this is for a signifcant amount of money.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now