Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #177525

Complaint Review: Vonage - Internet

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Nashville Tennessee
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Vonage vonage.com Internet U.S.A.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

i called 1/22/06 to switch to vonage in order to save a lot of money, as per their many advertisements. 30 days later, nothing has happened except they just now billed us for the first month!

i already regret switching to them, and the switch hasn't even gone thru yet. they promised that the switch would be made in 10 days, at the most 14. it has now been 30 days and vonage still has not made the switchover they promised.

in the meantime, we have to continue paying our existing service provider AT&T... and now vonage has the nerve to charge us for the past 30 days since we first called to sign up. but they haven't given us any service yet. so now we have TWO phone bills.

when i emailed them about it, they replied with hogwash that can basically be summarized as "too bad". when i call them for help, i usually can't understand what they're saying because of their accents. those i do understand are telling me that "that's just the way it is".

i have to sit on hold for an hour to try to get help... when i do get someone i can't understand them. when i do understand them, they are rude and inept.

i can't believe they actually get away with this BS. they suck.

Ron
Nashville, Tennessee
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 02/22/2006 12:25 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/vonage/internet/vonage-ripoff-liars-scam-deceptive-terrible-customer-service-long-hold-times-rude-in-177525. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
4Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#4 Consumer Suggestion

Where the fault lies.

AUTHOR: James A. - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Ron,

First, let me say there is no love lost between me and Vonage. I left them after 18 months due to multiple customer service issues ... the last one being BS over 911 calling.

But, as much as it pains me to "defend" Vonage, I do have to say one thing in their defense.

First, the customer service rep who promised you a ten-day turnaround on porting your AT&T number overstepped his/her authority. The reason why they did is because, in almost all cases, delays in porting a number are the fault of the "surrendering" provider, not the "accepting" provider. This makes accepting companies look bad when, in fact, the delay is not their fault. True, though, the promise Vonage made you was out of line. Customer service reps for ALL phone companies should know better.

I'm now a Packet8 customer and a very happy one. But even if you switched to Packet8, you'd encounter the same delay in porting your number. My advice?

Suck up the fact that you will have to keep your old phone service for some unknown duration. Get a new broadband phone with a new number and set up your old phone number to call-forward all calls to it ... while, at the same time, asking your broadband phone company to port the old number. Once the porting is complete, then you can have the broadband phone company "turn off" the original number.

This porting time delay issue is vexing. But, complaints over it should be directed where they belong ... in the FCC's lap. They really need to address this issue and put a reasonable time limit on all phone providers to surrender a number to a new provider. It's the only way this problem will ever be solved permanently.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Consumer Suggestion

Where the fault lies.

AUTHOR: James A. - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Ron,

First, let me say there is no love lost between me and Vonage. I left them after 18 months due to multiple customer service issues ... the last one being BS over 911 calling.

But, as much as it pains me to "defend" Vonage, I do have to say one thing in their defense.

First, the customer service rep who promised you a ten-day turnaround on porting your AT&T number overstepped his/her authority. The reason why they did is because, in almost all cases, delays in porting a number are the fault of the "surrendering" provider, not the "accepting" provider. This makes accepting companies look bad when, in fact, the delay is not their fault. True, though, the promise Vonage made you was out of line. Customer service reps for ALL phone companies should know better.

I'm now a Packet8 customer and a very happy one. But even if you switched to Packet8, you'd encounter the same delay in porting your number. My advice?

Suck up the fact that you will have to keep your old phone service for some unknown duration. Get a new broadband phone with a new number and set up your old phone number to call-forward all calls to it ... while, at the same time, asking your broadband phone company to port the old number. Once the porting is complete, then you can have the broadband phone company "turn off" the original number.

This porting time delay issue is vexing. But, complaints over it should be directed where they belong ... in the FCC's lap. They really need to address this issue and put a reasonable time limit on all phone providers to surrender a number to a new provider. It's the only way this problem will ever be solved permanently.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Suggestion

Where the fault lies.

AUTHOR: James A. - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Ron,

First, let me say there is no love lost between me and Vonage. I left them after 18 months due to multiple customer service issues ... the last one being BS over 911 calling.

But, as much as it pains me to "defend" Vonage, I do have to say one thing in their defense.

First, the customer service rep who promised you a ten-day turnaround on porting your AT&T number overstepped his/her authority. The reason why they did is because, in almost all cases, delays in porting a number are the fault of the "surrendering" provider, not the "accepting" provider. This makes accepting companies look bad when, in fact, the delay is not their fault. True, though, the promise Vonage made you was out of line. Customer service reps for ALL phone companies should know better.

I'm now a Packet8 customer and a very happy one. But even if you switched to Packet8, you'd encounter the same delay in porting your number. My advice?

Suck up the fact that you will have to keep your old phone service for some unknown duration. Get a new broadband phone with a new number and set up your old phone number to call-forward all calls to it ... while, at the same time, asking your broadband phone company to port the old number. Once the porting is complete, then you can have the broadband phone company "turn off" the original number.

This porting time delay issue is vexing. But, complaints over it should be directed where they belong ... in the FCC's lap. They really need to address this issue and put a reasonable time limit on all phone providers to surrender a number to a new provider. It's the only way this problem will ever be solved permanently.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Consumer Suggestion

Where the fault lies.

AUTHOR: James A. - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Ron,

First, let me say there is no love lost between me and Vonage. I left them after 18 months due to multiple customer service issues ... the last one being BS over 911 calling.

But, as much as it pains me to "defend" Vonage, I do have to say one thing in their defense.

First, the customer service rep who promised you a ten-day turnaround on porting your AT&T number overstepped his/her authority. The reason why they did is because, in almost all cases, delays in porting a number are the fault of the "surrendering" provider, not the "accepting" provider. This makes accepting companies look bad when, in fact, the delay is not their fault. True, though, the promise Vonage made you was out of line. Customer service reps for ALL phone companies should know better.

I'm now a Packet8 customer and a very happy one. But even if you switched to Packet8, you'd encounter the same delay in porting your number. My advice?

Suck up the fact that you will have to keep your old phone service for some unknown duration. Get a new broadband phone with a new number and set up your old phone number to call-forward all calls to it ... while, at the same time, asking your broadband phone company to port the old number. Once the porting is complete, then you can have the broadband phone company "turn off" the original number.

This porting time delay issue is vexing. But, complaints over it should be directed where they belong ... in the FCC's lap. They really need to address this issue and put a reasonable time limit on all phone providers to surrender a number to a new provider. It's the only way this problem will ever be solved permanently.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now