Guy Griffithe, Bridgegate Picture Corp. Bridgegate Management, Green Acres Pharms, RTSI, SMRB. these businesses refuse to pay shareholders and debt Corona California

Let me start with a response to BBGP/ Griffithe's fact 3 because 1 and 2 dont deserve a response.

Fact 3, answer; The only failed investments made by Samec, (3) all came to Samec by way of Maartin Rossouw, Samec's former financial advisor, and 2 of them have Guy Griffithe's name on them. Each one was introduced to Samec, by Rossouw, Rossouw told major lies, and presented false information to Samec, to get Samec to invest in these fraudulent scheme's.

Fact 4 answer;  Griffithe wrote and issued many notes atleast 14 with what he calls userous terms and conditions. Griffithe issued them with the thought in mind that the contracts would be unenforceable, therefore he Griffithe/ BBGP would not have to repay them, due to the userous terms. That is why Griffithe alleges it is the lenders fault, for the notes Griffithe himself drafted and issued.

Fact 5 answer; Griffithe admits the loan was due on 6/ 30/2017, this one is now 31 months 9 days past due as of today. Samec refused  to extend the note! The first payment made to Samec from Bridgegate Management, for BBGP Bounced, a full week after the check was written, and no instructions were given Samec to wait to cash, texts confirmed. This check was never made good.  Another check was issued Samec, by the same parties, that check was also pre- dated, and took 8 days to be cashable.

Fact 7 answer ;Griffithe tries to excuse his conduct throughout this mess, Griffithe is responsible for 100% of the terms and conditions of Samec's contract, and many more (14) that are also in default just like it. Griffithe has already admitted that much of the investor money collected from another business of his that comingled funds with BBGP did not go to their intended destinations.

Fact 8 answer; Samec is NOT a negoitiator for any union, he has however spoken with other individuals that have done business with Griffithe, Samec has heard many stories of the attendant pitfalls of doing business or loaning money to Griffithe , and/or his businesses. Seems that anybody rarely receives repayment. However Griffithe does spoil himself with luxuries, Porche's, Ferrari's, etc.

Fact 9 answer;  Griffithe lies again about past due notes, how about NK3'S note which was past due when Samec's note was issued, and is still in default by 35 months.

Fact 10 answer; There was no redacted bank statement ever provided Samec, or his council, truth is Griffithe fails to supply discovery in Samec's case in Pomona. Bravo, Griffithe by addmittal states he could do with Samec's money what ever he wanted regardless of its intended purpose. Anybody who reads that in Griffithe's fact 10 should realize how dishonest Griffithe is.

Fact 11 answer;  Griffithe makes statements that are factually untrue. Griffithe has intentionally delayed trail in the Pomona case with Samec twice, Griffithe has had a number or attorneys quit on him in the middle of many court cases he is defendant in. Griffithe calls himself an entrepreneur,  there is a big difference between an entrepreneur and theif. Entrepreneur's don't create websites with false, or fake info to pump up a business to induce investors, that they have no intention of repaying.

Griffithe, likes to claim Samec is an extortionist, however Samec has 3 contracts with Griffithe, and/or Griffithe companies that are in default, all of  these contracts were designed and issued by Griffithe, Griffithe even made a settlement offer to Samec, that Samec accepted, Griffithe did NOT pay the settlement. 

FINALLY; Griffithe is being charged by the Securities Exchange Commision, this case alleges FRAUD, and calls Griffithe's business practice PONZI like! I guess that kinda calls Griffithe out on his BS doesnt it.

Joe 

Attached Tamara Shelley, CEO of Bridgegate Picture Corp, sends  investor a nasty gram, also you can see investors response, it would be easier if Bridgegate Picture Corp. just paid their bills.

S.E.C. Case 3 8:20-cv-00124, Thats right Guy Griffithe on his way to a federal jury trial, being conducted by the S.E.C., and they are alleging FRAUD,and running a PONZI scheme. Lets see how Guy, and his legal department run their big mouths now. 

Joe

Ohh what lies, Guy Griffithe of Bridgegate Picture Corp. couldn't get his story straight if he tried most all of what he claims is lies,

Grifithe has no affidavid from my former financial advisor,

Griffithe wrote the Bridgegate Picture Corp. Promissory note,

Griffithe refuses to understand that BOTH parties need to be in agreement to change contracts, he doesn't get to dictate.

Griffithe did not have assetts to secure the personal Guarentee, as he only had $177,000.00 equity in his home at the time, and it was partly securing a already in default promissorry note for $ 250,000.00, and there was/is no agreement to pay this note either.

Griffithe, and Bridgegate Picture Corp. are currently in default on 14 Promissory Notes.

Griffithe has also collected $ Millions for SMRB, dba GreenAcres Pharms, through Renewable Technologies Solutions Inc. 

Green Acres Pharms DID NOT recieve the millions of the dollars collected by Griffithe, my fomer financial advisor Maartin Rossouw, or Griffithe's other sales agents.( that makes 2 scammy businesses)

Griffithe's first 9 million dollar bankruptcy  case 6:08-bk-15826-pc boasts CONTRACT FRAUD, NON PAYMENT, and more. this bk concluded in 2009, and immediately after businesses Griffithe manages began being sued for non-payment.

Griffithe, and/or the businesses he manages have been sued for non payment almost every year from the close of his bk in 2009 to the date of June 2019 when he filed his current bk.

Griffithe could not possibly have spent 6 figures on legal representation, he has named several of the law firms that have represented him against me, and others in the current bankruptcy.

Griffithe did use the company bank accounts to pay his personal debts such as, child support, gym membership, groceries, jewelry, etc.

Griffithe does not care who he swindles, some of Griffithe's victims are older people, 60's, 70's, 80's., others take second mortgages on their homes, some have dipped into their retirements, all to be apart of something equitable that could provide them future financial stability, thats how Griffithe's co-conspirators sold it.

Now to wrap this one up Griffithe has taken the liberty to try and attack my wife, in his rambles like the lying coward he is, my wife has never posted anything about Griffithe. But you should see the lies he has posted about my wife, Griffithe has filed 3 restraining orders against Joe Samec, 2 were dismissed, 1 settled by mutual stipulation, because Griffithe's attorney was afraid to face the judge with his allegations proven to be lies.

I work as an officer of a union that is true, I am salary and always well ecceed my hours paid for, my job in the field takes me all over, many different cities, and sometimes out of state assignments. So lies made by Griffithe, about abusing union resources, are now debunked.

I do tell everybody I talk to in the union about retirement, about Griffithe and his scandelous businesses It appears that Griffithe is showing some concern, as to all his court proceedings, at least 10 of them, in some of these cases he has had motions to compell filed against him, for refusing to supply discovery, if he did supply discovery, it would prove the FRAUD he has committed, and people dont file lawsuits because someone tells them too.

A man in bankruptcy, that plans to keep several luxury cars, and has atleast 3 lawyers, such as Griffithe is ABUSING THE LEGAL SYSTEM!  In short any and all who may have dealing with Griffithe in the future should really dive into who he really is, in the future I'm sure there will be more information out there on him and maybe even a website dedicated to his scandelous business activity, if Griffithe thinks that anything I have said to, or about him is slanderous, or libel, he should definately file suit against me, them I can produce as evidence the constant slew of lies he has sent in e-mails, and to the coward, that posted the rebuttal, post your name with your lies.

Joe

Consumers, 

Please take note as to this response regarding Joe Samec's continued disregard for the truth and facts. Let's begin the fact checking so the truth can be revealed with actual facts and not based on false allegations and conspiracies. 

Fact 1: Mr. Samec entered into a Promissory Note with Bridgegate Pictures Corp a Publicly Traded company. The note was negotiated with Mr. Samec and his then Financial Advisor. Mr. Griffithe wasn’t involved with any discussions with Mr. Samec nor did he speak or meet Mr. Samec. The entire transaction was conducted through a third party not directly with the company. 

Fact 2: The note was issued as of 03/30/2017. Mr. Samec and an authorized signer named Guy Griffithe who then was not an officer of the company but an Executive Producer who is vested in the company executed the document. The contract does contain verbiage referring to a Personal Guarantee.

Upon proper viewing of the Promissory Note Mr. Griffithe’s signature was affixed on the note as an authorized signer and not as a personal guarantor. In this case the personal guarantor only becomes effective IF the company does not pay.

The company has made offers by the omission of Mr. Samec which would conclude that the company is willing to pay. Therefore, as a result of the company continuing to make offers to Mr. Samec this would preclude Mr. Griffithe as the personal guarantor. Mr. Samec has wrongfully attacked Mr. Griffithe as the personal guarantor due to these facts.

*Note Mr. Griffithe did not become president of Bridgegate Pictures until May 9th 2017 which was after the promissory note. You can find this out by checking the OTC Market BBGP Press Release for May 9th, 2017*

Fact 3: Mr. Samec has made previous investments that have failed and then pushes blame onto others for which we have documented by an exhibit from an email drafted by his wife Brenda Samec. Brenda is also complicit in these defamation, slander, libel and bullying campaigns. This would conclude that he is well versed in researching and understanding investments. This will lead into fact #4.

Fact 4: All lenders bear the responsibility regarding issuance and acceptance of any note provided. In this case, the note is usurious and Mr. Samec bears the responsibility for it. It doesn't matter if a debtor begs and pleads the lender they cannot issue a note that does not conform to the applicable laws for that State.

It does not matter who the drafter of the note is as the lender is responsible for ensuring the note is correct. The lender has the power of position therefore that is why they bear the responsibility. The lender as in this case can refuse settlement causing interest and penalties to incur for the lenders benefit.

At a certain point this becomes abusive and in turn becomes unconscionable (Unconscionability is a doctrine in contract law that describes terms that are so extremely unjust, or overwhelmingly one-sided in favor of the party who has the superior bargaining power, that they are contrary to good conscience) which can lead to criminal charges.

In this case a 90 day note with an interest of 20% is equivalent to an 80% annual rate of return. In the State of California, the maximum annual interest rate is 10%. There are exceptions to this rule for licensed lenders but in this case it does not qualify therefore it is deemed usurious. When a note is usurious the court must deem all interest and penalties void allowing the lender to recoup his initial investment back. In this case where Mr. Samec provided a note for $100,000.00 and he received a payment for $25,000.00 this would conclude he is owed $75,000.00. 

Fact 5: Mr. Samec stated that the company is 26 months in default then in his next post on the same day says it is 29 months. This is an example of Mr. Samec’s false statements. If he cannot get the simplest facts correct as the lender how could one deem the validity to any of the statements he makes.   Facts are, the original note was due on June 30, 2017.

The company reached out to his then financial advisor requesting an extension. Mr. Samec contested this extension but it is documented to provide evidence of his continued disregard for the facts. The extension provided would have taken the note due date to 9-30-2017. At this time the company reached out to his financial advisor and instructed that due to a project delaying its delivery to the market we would like to provide Mr. Samec a good faith payment for his interest to defer the loan.

*This is called doing good business and showing consideration and respect to a lender in communicating delays* At the time the company worked out a deal with his financial advisor, it was negotiated that we would provide a payment for $20,000.00. The financial advisor by omitting in an affidavit that he would instruct his client to deposit the payment the following Monday in order for the company to clear the transfer of funds.

His then advisor told us he did provide his client the instructions. Mr. Samec immediately went to the bank instead of waiting until Monday against the instructions of his then financial advisor and tried to cash the check which resulted in rejection due to unavailable funds. *Note Samec has made remarks as to in the future not issue a payment for today when it is for Monday.

When you give specific instructions you assume parties will adhere to them* The company was notified immediately and we reached out to his advisor who was upset that his client did not comply. In good faith we issued a second payment adding another $5,000.00 totaling $25,000.00 which he successfully deposited and cleared. He was to sign a letter deferring the note, he took the payment and refused to sign the document which is confirmed by email.

Fact 6: Mr. Samec filed a lawsuit shortly after obtaining the payment from the company. He named third party companies not related to the Promissory Note in reference. Mr. Samec's first filing was to Guy Griffithe dba Bridgegate Pictures, Bridgegate Entertainment Inc. and Bridgegate Management. The company counsel for Bridgegate Pictures Corp discovered the faulty filing.

Mr. Samec alleged that Bridgegate Pictures did not exist. He alleged it was a dba of Guy Griffithe personally because in his research he did not do enough due diligence. He looked in California for Bridgegate Pictures and did not find one. He did find Bridgegate Entertainment Inc. which is a corporation unrelated to Bridgegate Pictures Corp and was created after his Promissory Note was issued.

He concluded that Guy Griffithe was moving assets to this company to hide them. Facts: Bridgegate Pictures Corp is a Nevada Corporation established on 06/19/1997 according to Nevada Secretary of State, it is a publicly traded company under the symbol BBGP. That is the proper party for his claim.

Bridgegate Entertainment Inc. was established on April 19, 2017 validated from Secretary of State in California after Mr. Samec's Note, where it was negotiating to complete a joint venture with a technology company on an upcoming project. Due to Mr. Samec falsely naming them in his suit that contract was lost causing that company unjust damages.

Bridgegate Management is a management company established in Wyoming on 09/21/2015 according to Wyoming Secretary of State where it has service agreements in place to collect and make payments on behalf of other companies and individuals. Bridgegate Management under its contract received the payment for Bridgegate Pictures Corp and issued Mr. Samec his payment for interest to balance the transaction.

Bridgegate Management is not owned or otherwise associated to Bridgegate Pictures Corp and has been wrongfully named in Mr. Samec's suit. *Bridgegate Management is owned by Guy Griffithe and the Service Agreements were approved by each company and board*

Fact 7: Mr. Samec stated he was made several offers, each one far less than owed. Fact: as this note is a usurious note Mr. Samec in accordance to the law Civil Code Article 15 § 1. he is only entitled to $75,000.00 as the interest and penalty charges are unenforceable. Upon working with Mr. Samec's counsel Bridgegate Pictures immediately sent an offer for $115,000.00 which provided him an 40% annual return.

This offer was made as a 4 quarterly payment offer. Mr. Samec declined the offer. In order to resolve this matter so we could move on Bridgegate again sent another offer but designed it different. This offer was done as a 998 offer which means that if he does not accept the offer Bridgegate and Guy Griffithe would be entitled to all of their legal and attorney fees from that point on if the court awarded any amount less than the offer.

This offer was a one lump sum payment in the amount of $135,000.00. This provided him an 60% percent annual return on his money including his entire principal back. Mr. Samec declined the offer. Bridgegate learned that the note was usurious at this point as it was not previously known, yet Bridgegate in an effort to resolve the matter made a final offer which again with a 998 also a one lump sum payment for the amount of $150,000.00.

This offer provided Mr. Samec nearly a 200% return on his investment. Yes, he declined. After counsel from both sides discussed this matter privately and concluded that based on the recommendation of his counsel Mr. Samec would take an offer of $165,000.00 one lump sum payment. Mr. Griffithe was made aware at this point that Mr. Samec has made threats and remarks that he intends on taking the company down and inducing harm to Mr. Griffithe.

Mr. Griffithe informed counsel that it is the intention of Mr. Samec which has been clearly identified through this process of settlement that he is trying to extort the company and has no regard for the process or the law. Mr. Griffithe approved the final offer of $165,000.00 with the stipulation that it is a one final offer, no negotiations and if he does not accept then we will take our defense regarding his usurious and extortion tactics. The final offer was made and Mr. Samec declined as predicted.

Fast 8: Mr. Samec has continued to create conspiracies based on fictional information. He states in his complaint that he does not represent himself as a negotiator for the union. The company has documented affidavits that Mr. Samec has called and showed up at companies, peoples place of employment and homes stating that he is an investigator for the union with his side clip which has his union card in it that upon first view looks like it could be an official logo.

He uses this tactic abusing his company resources including the union truck which is identified on camera, union phones, time on the clock working for union out investigating for himself unrelated to union time or business. He has inducted union members to a campaign aimed at defaming, slandering, harassing and bullying the companies and Mr. Griffithe through social media and other means.

Mr. Samec has stalked the home of Mr. Griffithe which he is on camera and clearly identified in his union truck. Mr. Samec claimed in court that he was there to see a property that happened to be on Mr. Griffithe's street. That would beg to differ when we have statements that he had no appointment to the property he claimed, he was asking neighbors specifically about Mr. Griffithe's comings and goings. 

Fact 9: Mr. Samec makes claims that Bridgegate was previously in default of notes at the time his was issued. The facts are that is completely untrue as Bridgegate only had one prior note in existence at the time Mr. Samec's note was issued. The one prior note had a due date in the same month that Mr. Samec's note was issued, however payment arrangements were made and interest payments were provided keeping the note a performing liability.

Furthermore, Mr. Griffithe was not an officer of the company at that time and the filings on the public OTC would not have reflected that to determine there would have been anything in default. Even though this doesn't apply in this case, it is not against the law to obtain new debt even if you have existing debt or debt in default.

The promissory note did not require or ask for any financials or financial stability of the guarantor. Additional facts to this case on this matter: Mr. Samec continues to make false statements regarding the company and Mr. Griffithe's financial condition at the time his note was issued. Let’s fact check this as it is all available to the public.

Bridgegate according to its publicly filed financial balance sheet as of 01/31/2017 being the most recent filing at the time the note was issued states total assets of $2,136,756.00.  This does exceed $100,000.00 meaning that company did in fact have enough assets to support the debt if it was asked or required. AS for Mr. Griffithe, if you go to 3/30/2017 you will find that the BBGP stock was at a price of 15 cents.

The market was fully trading and had daily volume. According to the filings Mr. Griffithe under his company had 20 million shares. 15 cents times 20 million shares equals $3,000,000.00 in assets. That alone without any other assets is sufficient for a $100,000.00 note guarantor had this issue arose at that time. This would conclude Mr. Griffithe had sufficient assets as of this period of time as well.

This does not include Mr. Griffithe’s personal assets. This is the easiest way to show everyone through public resources that Mr. Samec has always and continues to state false statements of facts to try and position himself the victim. 

Fact 10: Mr. Samec makes statements that Mr. Griffithe took and used his $100,000.00 for personal use. This is yet another outrageous and outlandish statement of defamation and slander. The facts are which have been evidence by a redacted bank statement that Bridgegate Management accepted the funds from Mr. Samec on behalf of Bridgegate Pictures in accordance to their Service Agreement, then immediately was instructed to disburse those funds to a production film company in Canada where a feature film was in progress.

There was no use of proceeds attached to the loan so the company could have hosted a 100k party and it would still not be a breach of the note but this is to prove that Mr. Samec has continued to make false slanderous defamation statements about Mr. Griffithe. This has caused both the company and Mr. Griffithe substantial damages. 

Fact 11: Mr. Samec makes claims that Guy Griffithe defrauded him out of his money to Bridgegate and used it for personal use. He claims that everything his own financial advisor told him regarding Bridgegate and Mr. Griffithe was a lie.

The best thing about fact checking is when the story teller finds out he is the one that has truly defamed and caused all this damage based on false statements and misrepresentations of the truth. All the information provided are actual facts which can be verified on public sites. Mr. Samec has in fact slandered and committed hundreds of acts of defamation which include libel, harassment and bullying. 

Mr. Samec induced other parties to file suits based on the lies and false statements for the benefit of positioning his case. In closing Mr. Samec publishes false statements and conspiracies for his own personal gain. He has stated that he doesn't care if everyone loses everything and he will never stop. These type of people should not be allowed to create this much chaos which in turn harms everyone involved.

Our company has been very patient in providing the truth through this process. We are prepared to provide all the supporting documents to the courts to showcase his actions in extorting, tortuously interfering, bullying, defamation and slandering the company and Mr. Griffithe. 

You can look up all the cases that Mr. Samec has posted and if you review you will see that they all came from the same nucleus surrounding him and his actions. This has been a premeditated attack against the company and Mr. Griffithe. Bridgegate Pictures Corp has successfully Produced and Delivered every film it has gone into production with to the market.

Bridgegate Pictures has continued to develop and provide new advancements for the market place. Mr. Griffithe produced and delivered film and technology products successfully to the market and has accomplished becoming an award winning Producer in doing so. He has been a part of many companies and like any business person not everything goes to plan. He has had a share of failures and successes.

If it serves us correctly that is the true meaning of entrepreneurship in America. It is true that Mr. Griffithe has had to enter into his second bankruptcy at the age of 40. This was caused by Mr. Samec’s efforts in a plot to destroy Mr. Griffithe and his associates. Mr. Griffithe embraced an overwhelming attack due to this conspiracy which affects his normal ability to perform duties with his companies along with having to defend these actions spending six figures in litigation costs leading to insolvency.

This type of Corporate and personal sabotage is like domestic terrorism and should have criminal consequences. If this is not a case of extortion, then any logical person would have accepted settlements made and found reasonable terms to resolve this matter. Mr. Samec has allowed several more months to pass for his benefit in thinking he can extort more money leading to his recent request for $260,000.00 when he is owed $75,000.00 and has been made several offers. This is the definition of extortion.  

 I applaud all that strive to try and build and make a difference. I don't applaud individuals that are out to create harm and hurt people based on false information aimed at destruction. All consumers need to join in and aid against bullying and defamation in support of the people trying to make a difference. As we become more technically advanced, people are using these tools to harm companies and individuals through social media and online postings. This should be done responsibly and any parties that misuse this process should face criminal charges and damages awarded to the parties injured. Bullying is a serious problem and cyber bullying, harassment and defamation should not be tolerated by anyone.

Mr. Samec's post also violates this sites terms and conditions. This site has the responsability of screaning all posts for compliance and removing ones in violation.

Guy Griffithe claims I have made false claims! I have never represented that I am a union negotiator, and I am not a negotiator. I have been offered 1 offer that even comes close to what is owed me, by Bridgegate Picture Corp., and Guy Griffithe, and then Guy refused to pay it.

I am not a userous lender. Furthermore I would not have loaned the money to Guy, or Bridgegate Picture Corp. under the contract that Guy designed ,drafted , and issued to me with Guy's worthless personal guarentee, if I had known that everything Guy perveyed to Maartin Rossouw who issued me the contract, for Guy was a LIE.

Nobody is extorting Guy Griffithe or Bridgegate Picture Corp. what is happening is Guy Griffithe is has gotten himself in a bit of a mess, on his second bankruptcy, because he is untrustworthy, and about as big a LIAR as you will find. Guy likes to throw out accusations that I am slandering him, it is only slander if it is untrue. Everything I have stated about Mr. Griffithe is true, and provable.

You can reference the following adversary cases against Guy Griffithe in bankruptcy court for more information about his self proclaimed integrity. 

1. 8:19-ap-01195

2. 8:19-ap-01199

3. 8:19-ap-01200

4. 8:19-ap-01201

5. 8:19-ap-01202

I can only speak on the facts I know! Guy Griffithe, I loaned Bridgegate Picture Corp. ( BBGP) money on a 90 day note, 29 months ago, they have not paid back the loan. Guy states that the loan contract has a userous interest and penalty rate. This contract was designed by someone either on staff at BBGP, or Guy Griffithe, then issued to me by Maartin Rossouw, with Guy Griffithe's signature on it, there are also many before and after my contract was issued, most are also currently in default.

I have 2 business dealings with Guy Griffithe, Guy, nor the companies BBGP, or SMRB. a.k.a. Green acres Pharms (GAP), Renewable Technologies Solutions Inc.( RTSI) have honored their contracts with me, and many others, however they did cash my checks. Guy uses funds from the company accounts to pay personal expenses, if Guy would like to dispute this I can supply the supporting documents to the judge. Guy likes to get on social media, and pump himself up as honest, and doing good business, well he doesn't.

Guy is in a bind right now because some of the people he has screwed over are fighting back, I'm sure Guy Griffithe will be back on social media letting his jaybird mouth override his hummingbird a*s, talking bad about me because I sued his lying a*s, well get after it Guy, everybody will see, remember I have supporting documents, what do you have.

Joe

I am Joe Samec, the claims that I am making are true. None of what I am saying is false. I made a loan to  Bridgegate Picture Corp.( BBGP), insured by a personal guarantee from Guy Griffithe to cover the loan. This was a 90 day note, that is now 26 months in default, BBGP. ,nor Guy Griffithe are honoring their contract that they designed and issued.

Guy has LIED, not only to me, but to others as well. Guy Griffithe has recently filed for bankruptcy, for the second time at the age of 40, quite an accomplished businessman he is. This is not an isolated incident, there are 18 loans made to BBGP., per the OTC. Pink report, atleast 8 of them are in default by 2 years or better.

There have been several offers made, each 1 for far less than owed, or to make me whole, I have several emails containing promises to pay , and even offering a bonus, from Guy Griffithe, I am not the only one, again there are several more with the same lies in their emails. This is not a case of extortion, this is a case of someone wanting BBGP, and Guy Griffithe to honor their contract, I would call Guy a bully too, but I cant because Guy hides, and uses the court system as his playground to allude paying his debt, his BK-2#8:19-bk-12480-TA,(2019), BK,-1#6:08-ap-01316-PC, ( 2008).

Active law suits currently naming Guy Griffithe as a Defendant, most alledging a form of fraud

1. KC069896, POMONA CA.

2. CIVDS1828143, SAN BERNADINO CA.

3. Ric 1821277 RIVERSIDE CA.,

4. RIC1903005 RIVERSIDE CA.,

5. 30-2019-01065565-CU-BC-CJC, ORANGE CA.,

6.19-2-00772-9, KING COUNTY WA.

7. 37-2019-00030089-CU-BC-NC, SAN DIEGO CA. and 2 more he may be included under " DOES" so Guy Griffithe is right, do some investigating before you invest in anything he is invloved in.

By the way Guy also makes false representations on BBGP, OTC PInk Report, and I can prove it, Guy should tell everyone why the S.E.C is looking at him, and explain all these lawsuits. Guy needs to quit throwing out big words and man up to his obligations.

Dear consumers,

It has been brought to our attention that a party has made false claims and reports against the company and its employees. The party can be referenced as Joseph Samec who represents himself as a negotiator for the Union whereas he uses abuses his athority acting in a legal capacity. Based on the reports and posting this individual is making we have found that he is creating Libel and deformation statements that are false.

Mr. Samec has been offered several settlements but as a usurous lender he continues to extort the company for his own personal gain. In this report he makes such statements that "Guy has no integrity" which is a slandous, Libel and deformation statement here within itself. Statements that anyone was "induced" and that Mr. Griffithe "has made off with our money" but states "we seem" to have lost is a assumption that he is displaying contradictory false information. No party has provided false information to any person(s) and such statements are libel.

As the company has sympathy to all lenders, shareholders and customers we focus on healthy solutions for all parties. In this particular case the individual is using forums like this to inflict harm and damage to the reputation of the companies, its employees and staff. We ask the community to assist in fighting against corporate and personal extortion, cyber and social media bullying.

You can reference the case filings for more informartion pertaining to the cases between the parties. The company will continue to defend the matter and work towards correct resolution based on the circumstances and damages that have been brought forth.