Offshore Corp Talk - banned me permanently and refuses to refund paid "lifetime” subscription — arbitrary, abusive, and deceptive moderation Internet

Since publishing this report, OffshoreCorpTalk has quietly updated its Terms and Conditions, clearly attempting to retroactively justify my ban.

At the time I was banned, the original terms did not prohibit or even reference the actions they later claimed were violations. After my report and complaints, they rewrote their rules, adding vague and subjective clauses about content, behavior, and admin discretion—clearly designed to retrofit justification for what was an arbitrary and retaliatory ban.

This tactic reveals everything:

• Why change the rules after banning someone, unless you know the ban had no basis?

• Why no prior warning, no process, no appeal—just a silent rewrite of the terms?

• This is not due process. It's a cover-up.

OCT doesn't uphold standards—it invents them as needed. First they ban you, then they write the rules to explain it. This is not how ethical platforms operate.

Users deserve transparency and stability—not a system where the rules change after you've been punished.

The response posted by OffshoreCorpTalk does not refute a single factual allegation. Instead, it leans on vague, unsubstantiated claims and character attacks to distract from the actual misconduct.

Let’s return to the facts:

• My profile on OffshoreCorpTalk was manipulated by forum administrators to display false information—including attributing a fake profession ("Working for the IRS") and location to me, with the clear intent to ridicule and discredit.

• I was permanently banned without warning or explanation, despite having paid for an expensive “lifetime membership.” Why? Because I posted verifiable facts that didn’t align with the interests of the forum’s admins and their promoted “partners. 

• The defamatory post on this very page falsely portrays me as a criminal or unethical actor, without offering a single shred of evidence.

This pattern—defame, ban, and silence dissent—is not consistent with the values of “integrity” that OffshoreCorpTalk claims to uphold.

Instead of owning up to this abuse of admin power, they double down with recycled accusations and no proof, hoping to smear rather than respond.

This is textbook retaliation. And it's precisely why I’m pursuing legal remedies.

It’s rather ironic to see accusations being thrown around by someone with a long track record of questionable conduct. Running operations that raise serious compliance concerns, from fabricated invoices to unlicensed crypto dealing, hardly puts one in a position to judge others.

As the saying goes:
"People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones"

We stand firmly by our decision.
It was the right call then, and it remains the right call now.

OffshoreCorpTalk operates on integrity, and no individual is above the standards we uphold for this community.

After publishing this report, I received a threatening email from someone calling himself Peter Larsson, claiming that my statements were false and contained “personal data” — and warning me that I may have committed a criminal offense. The email demanded I remove names and “personally identifiable information” within 24 hours, or face a complaint to “the relevant authorities.”

Let’s be clear:

• This report is posted on a U.S.-based platform, protected by the First Amendment.
• No private data was disclosed — only information already publicly available or tied to public activity on forums.
• Vague legal threats with no legal basis are a common tactic used by people who fear transparency.

Instead of addressing any of the content in my original report, they opted for intimidation. That alone speaks volumes.

If you receive similar threats, know your rights — and know that truth is not defamation.