Complaint Review: Thomas D'Iorio - New York, Florida, North Carolina, Saratoga
- Thomas D'Iorio New York, Florida, North Carolina, Saratoga United States
- Phone:
- Web:
- Category: Scam artist, Real Estate Investing, Real Estate SCAMMERS , scam-Suspected fraud, Theft Of Service
Thomas D'Iorio Thomas Diorio Tom Diorio Tom D'Iorio Phoenix Building Corp. CRIMINAL FRAUD/RICO CASE IN NEW YORK - Wire Fraud, breach of contract, and negligence. New York, Florida, North Carolina, Saratoga
*General Comment: The Port St. Lucie project was not a hoax.
*Author of original report: Tom Diorio Fraud In Real Estate
This case is a complex commercial action that seeks damages and equitable relief arising out of violations of the Racketeering Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. 1961, and Wire Fraud Statute, 18 U.S.C. 1343, as well as common law conversion, fraud, breach of contract, and negligence.
Plaintiffs were allegedly defrauded by the Defendants, who together, conspired to nefariously solicit investments from them by creating compelling background stories and fictional real estate development offerings. He is a crook.
Here is the link https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20190522d85
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 06/28/2019 04:51 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/report/thomas-diorio/new-york-florida-north-tom-1481127. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:



#2 General Comment
The Port St. Lucie project was not a hoax.
AUTHOR: John - (United States)
SUBMITTED: Monday, December 16, 2024
I know from a first hand prospective that the Port Saint Lucie project was a legitimate opportunity and is now a completed multi family project with tenants and everything. Any monies that Mr. Porco paid on this job were received and kept by Mr. Diorio. Craig Greene did not solicit any monies and had no benefit from any project funds dispersed on this project. Craig Greene is not involved with any other projects relating to Mr. Debosse. Craig Greene and Mr. Debosse are acquaintances through Mr. Diorio.

#1 Author of original report
Tom Diorio Fraud In Real Estate
AUTHOR: Robert - (United States)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, July 11, 2019
The owner of an Elmsford construction company claims he was swindled in a real estate development racket.
Elliott Porco, owner of Construction Directions LLC, sued three men and their companies for $1.4 million for alleged violations of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act in White Plains federal court on June 29.
He and his company accuse the men of conspiring to gain his trust “by creating compelling background stories and fictional expertise in connection with real estate development offerings.”
Porco’s lawsuit names Thomas DiOrio of Katonah; Frank DeBoise and Craig Greene, whose addresses are unknown; and six limited liability corporations. DiOrio did not immediately respond to a voicemail message asking for his side of the story.
Porco says that when he met the men in 2014, DiOrio said they were looking for a partner for projects in New York and Florida.
They allegedly offered to hire Porco for a $1.8 million excavation and foundation job in Brooklyn, and Porco agreed to pay an insurance premium. But the project never happened, and Porco lost $153,000.
DiOrio also persuaded Porco in 2014 to invest in a $51.6 million apartment complex in Port St. Lucie, Florida, the complaint states, and promised him an equity stake in the companies that would own the apartments.
The developers allegedly said they would need more funds as costs came in during construction. Porco wired three checks totaling $37,500.
Nothing was built, the complaint states, and Porco was never given an ownership interest in anything.
“Defendants simply took plaintiffs’ money and disappeared,” the complaint states, “once plaintiffs stopped wiring funds.”
The Tampa project, as depicted in the lawsuit, was the biggest score. DiOrio allegedly pitched a hotel and condominium project as a “done deal.” All that was needed was $500,000 to close on the land.
He asked Porco for $150,000. In return, Porco would get 10 percent ownership of the project and 10 percent of the construction management fee. Construction Directions would get a $25 million contract for window work.
In November 2014, Porco wired $150,000 to a company set up for the project.
DiOrio allegedly asked for more funds over the following months, and Porco complied: $20,000 for architectural drawings, $4,000 for legal expenses, $37,000 as a loan for permits and attorney fees, $12,500 for closing expenses, $3,000 to cover interest payments owed to another investor, $1,000 for project costs, and $15,000 as additional capital.
Finally, last December, DeBoise allegedly asked for another $50,000. Porco declined.
DiOrio, Greene and DeBoise had repeatedly represented the project as ongoing, the complaint states, and investment returns as forthcoming. Delays were blamed on Tampa’s permitting process, lenders’ need for documents and funding needed for separate contracts.
But no land had been purchased. Nothing was built. No ownership interests were conveyed.
Instead, Porco alleges, the developers rolled his money into real estate projects to which he was not privy.
Porco’s attorney, Stephen A. Florek III in White Plains, charges the developers with running a racketeering enterprise, under the RICO law, and fraud and breach of contract. Porco and his company claim out-of-pocket losses of $435,000 and seek another $1 million in punitive damages.


Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.