X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now
Ripoff Report | Www.StoresonLine.com Review - Orem, Utah
Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #94666

Complaint Review: Www.StoresonLine.com - Orem Utah

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Forest Park Illinois
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Www.StoresonLine.com 754 E. Technology Ave. Orem, Utah U.S.A.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Click here now..

I purchased two (2) sets of three websites, which they were going to assist me in putting the set up within the year.

It never happened. I was just told that I needed to get some extra money and purchase some additional services.

But my credit was bad. having gone thru a BANKRUPTCY, a FORECLOSURE, and possibly a divorce.

Clifton
Forest Park, Illinois
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 06/12/2004 05:48 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/wwwstoresonlinecom/orem-utah-84097/wwwstoresonlinecom-universal-data-services-ripoff-deceptive-and-non-helpful-in-helpi-94666. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
6Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#6 Consumer Comment

dissappointed

AUTHOR: Warren - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Sunday, June 27, 2004

I thought this was a legitimate company and probably sensed something was wrong when I was shifted over to PMI., then nothing.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 Consumer Suggestion

Solution for California residents

AUTHOR: Mike - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, June 25, 2004

To Robert of Oxnard, CA and other California residents, a suit was filed in California, see San Mateo County, and a judgment filed against StoresOnline requiring them to reimburse customers. Check also with the California Better Business Bureau. Their activities violate door-to-door sales laws.

Other victims should see their respective state consumer protection agencies and lodge a complaint based on violation of door-to-door sales laws or violation of business opportunity laws. Some states have no business opportunity laws. States finding against StoresOnline for violation of business opportunity laws include Washington and Maine.

Unfortunately the federal door-to-door law covers "consumer" door-to-door transactions and may not cover these "business to business" transactions. Maybe complaints to Congress about these kinds of business scams might change federal law or prompt the FTC to look into this.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Consumer Suggestion

Solution for California residents

AUTHOR: Mike - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, June 25, 2004

To Robert of Oxnard, CA and other California residents, a suit was filed in California, see San Mateo County, and a judgment filed against StoresOnline requiring them to reimburse customers. Check also with the California Better Business Bureau. Their activities violate door-to-door sales laws.

Other victims should see their respective state consumer protection agencies and lodge a complaint based on violation of door-to-door sales laws or violation of business opportunity laws. Some states have no business opportunity laws. States finding against StoresOnline for violation of business opportunity laws include Washington and Maine.

Unfortunately the federal door-to-door law covers "consumer" door-to-door transactions and may not cover these "business to business" transactions. Maybe complaints to Congress about these kinds of business scams might change federal law or prompt the FTC to look into this.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Consumer Suggestion

Solution for California residents

AUTHOR: Mike - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, June 25, 2004

To Robert of Oxnard, CA and other California residents, a suit was filed in California, see San Mateo County, and a judgment filed against StoresOnline requiring them to reimburse customers. Check also with the California Better Business Bureau. Their activities violate door-to-door sales laws.

Other victims should see their respective state consumer protection agencies and lodge a complaint based on violation of door-to-door sales laws or violation of business opportunity laws. Some states have no business opportunity laws. States finding against StoresOnline for violation of business opportunity laws include Washington and Maine.

Unfortunately the federal door-to-door law covers "consumer" door-to-door transactions and may not cover these "business to business" transactions. Maybe complaints to Congress about these kinds of business scams might change federal law or prompt the FTC to look into this.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Suggestion

Solution for California residents

AUTHOR: Mike - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, June 25, 2004

To Robert of Oxnard, CA and other California residents, a suit was filed in California, see San Mateo County, and a judgment filed against StoresOnline requiring them to reimburse customers. Check also with the California Better Business Bureau. Their activities violate door-to-door sales laws.

Other victims should see their respective state consumer protection agencies and lodge a complaint based on violation of door-to-door sales laws or violation of business opportunity laws. Some states have no business opportunity laws. States finding against StoresOnline for violation of business opportunity laws include Washington and Maine.

Unfortunately the federal door-to-door law covers "consumer" door-to-door transactions and may not cover these "business to business" transactions. Maybe complaints to Congress about these kinds of business scams might change federal law or prompt the FTC to look into this.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Consumer Suggestion

We were very happy when we heard the presentation and bought same day.

AUTHOR: Robert - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Tuesday, June 15, 2004

1st is we would not pay full price and asked for discount twice and both times we receive 10% off. The third time we were given additional material and lines at no cost.

Always ask for discount.

2nd when we heard of Stores On Line here, we cancelled right away and reported to card company same day. They try to say "No Refund" and "No Cooling Off Period", even though they provide you with that information at sale. The way they are getting around that is that if it is sold "Business to Business" there is no "Cooling Period". I did not have a business license at time of sale, SO I HAVE "COOLING PERIOD".

They also had the "Show" on State of California owned property. That is the most likely reason they have not been back in CA since.

They still call and we just respond that it was cancelled the next day. They hang up real quick.

Best Wishes to All, even Stores

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.