• Report: #491958

Complaint Review: Allied Security

Thank You

Read how Ripoff Report saves consumers millions.

  • Submitted: Tue, September 08, 2009
  • Updated: Sat, June 30, 2012

  • Reported By: Terry M. — TRENTON New Jersey USA
Allied Security
Route 1 North Monmouth Junction, New Jersey United States of America

Allied Security ALLIED VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL RIGHTS BY ALLIEDBARTON Monmouth Junction, New Jersey

* : AN EMPLOYER CAN DO, & WILL DO WHATEVER THEY WANT! EVEN THE TOP EXECUTIVES AT PUBLICLY HELD COMPANIES WILL CONSPIRE....

* : HE WAS DEFINITELY RETALIATED AGAINST FOR MAKING THIS COMPLAINT TO THE EEOC

* : HE WAS DEFINITELY SEXUALLY HARASSED UNDER EEOC GUIDELINES

* : THIS GUY DEFINITELY GOT RACIALLY HARRASSED

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

This guy routinely experienced racial harassment. This Guy who is a Black employee of The AlliedBarton Security Company described being routinely subjected to discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, insults, racially offensive comments and cartoons and images which denigrated African Americans.  This Guy was routinely was called Colored Boy and at one time was even called a ((((REDACTED FOUL LANGUAGE))).

 

Other offensive conduct experienced towards this guy included a racist cartoon left behind for him to see by a white Subordinate and when complained about it, was told by his Manager, who is white get over it.  Racial jokes told by white co-workers and managers; a photograph of a burned hanging of a black man while approximately 22 white men celebrated. [continued below]....
.....

 

A complaint which was filed to the State also states that this company (AlliedBarton) was fully aware of Sexual Materials being sent to this guy private email address by an AlliedBarton Client.  During which time of receiving such emails, this guy who only wanted to work felt that his Civil Rights were being violated and contacted his employers at AlliedBarton but was told that the Client is the person who pays the paycheck and he must entertain him regardless of what he does.  Now naturally this guy is thinking that AlliedBarton is attempting to be a pimp but this is a straight guy and he is now wondering does Sexual Harassment represent him and he is told by this company that IT CAN'T BE SAME SEX SEXUAL HARASSMENT and this guy was ORDERED to just give nice comment back and then Deleted any unwanted emails but under NO CIRCUMSTANCES is he to waste anyone time with a complaint that is just do not fall under any E.E.O.C. rules.  When I asked this guy about not reading the E.E.O.C. rules and he was told that they did not have it visual where people could see them.  

 

After taking a Class, this guy found other avenues to try and stop the unwanted emails and racial comments that he had to take.  This guy started to write other people with these complaints even me and I put a post on here.   

 

When it was found out that he was telling people about the Harassments, AlliedBarton attempted to FIRE this guy.  They made sure that this have to report to one of the people that knew he was being HARASSED weekly basis.  This guy was stressing so badly that they started making sure that he was not getting his paycheck stubs and he pay was changing.  Now here they were tapering with this guys check because he wanted to file a complaint with other people since they were not doing anything about the Harassment.  What was this guy to do?  I guess they expected him to keep being called A ((((REDACTED FOUL LANGUAGE))) , keep sending this guy daughter SEX MAIL.  Yes they were sending this SEX MAIL and knew his 6 yr old daughter was seeing it.  THIS SHOULD PISS OFF ANYONE AND EVERYONE who is African-American, A Father or HUMAN. 

 

Under EEOC Sexual Harassment, Racial Harassment and Workplace Retaliation all violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

 

Its hard to imagine that in the 21st century Sexual and Racial Harassment are still so widespread in the workplace. Though the in the beginning AlliedBarton Management Team used words on written emails that they were such aggressive against any type of Harassment but yet verbally they showed how they wanted to make sure that this guy knew his place UNTIL they found out that he SAVED the emails of Sexual Harassment and this guy also SAVED the copies of Racial Cartoons that was countless left for him to see.

 

When it was written on here before about everything that this guy was going through, AlliedBarton District Manager K.S. approached him and threaten him to take it down.

 

I am hoping that The EEOC would look into investigating more complaints by employees with respect to AlliedBarton Security Service as they are strong with a Legal Department that believes that if its YOUR WORD AGAINST THEIRS it will NEVER get investigated or it will never go far into the investigation.  There were friends investigating friends within the AlliedBarton Management Office and therefore they were all protecting one another.  They made sure that this guy felt uncomfortable in making the complaint to them and they constantly interrogated this guy while I was making the complaint.  This company has ruin this guy's trust in Human Kind and it is understandable why he just don't trust anyone in the AlliedBarton's Camp.  Maybe I am wrong but I agree with the fact of him not trusting people of AlliedBarton Management Team. 

 

Just wondering, what do you think?????

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 09/08/2009 07:42 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Allied-Security/Monmouth-Junction-New-Jersey-/Allied-Security-ALLIED-VIOLATIONS-OF-CIVIL-RIGHTS-BY-ALLIEDBARTON-Monmouth-Junction-New-J-491958. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Allied Security

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author 4Consumer 0Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1

AN EMPLOYER CAN DO, & WILL DO WHATEVER THEY WANT! EVEN THE TOP EXECUTIVES AT PUBLICLY HELD COMPANIES WILL CONSPIRE....

AUTHOR: Karl - (U.S.A.)

to cover-up the TRUTH, and hire Law Firms to do whatever is necessary to make sure that INNOCENT people working in the United States of America, & innocent consumers in America are FINANCIALLY INJURED because this is the 'way' our country, & economy both operate.

WELCOME TO AMERICA- IN FRAUD WE TRUST!

P.S. Don't forget to visit the 'BANK OF AMERICA' page of this site, as well as the 'MERRILL LYNCH' page & the 'WELLS FARGO' page for more proof as to what America has really become- ONE MASSIVE PONZI SCHEME that preys upon the innocent people in the USA, & all over the WORLD.

*SPREAD THIS ALL OVER THE WEB at sites like- 'TWITTER' & 'FACEBOOK'.

Thank you.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2

HE WAS DEFINITELY RETALIATED AGAINST FOR MAKING THIS COMPLAINT TO THE EEOC

AUTHOR: Doug p. - (USA)

An employer may not fire, DEMOTEHARASS or otherwise "retaliate" against an individual for filing a charge of discrimination, participating in a discrimination proceeding, or otherwise opposing discrimination. The same laws that prohibit discrimination based on race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, and disability, as well as wage differences between men and women performing substantially equal work, also prohibit retaliation against individuals who oppose unlawful discrimination or participate in an employment discrimination proceeding.


In addition to the protections against retaliation that are included in all of the laws enforced by EEOC, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) also protects individuals from coercion, intimidation, threat, harassment, or interference in their exercise of their own rights or their encouragement of someone else's exercise of rights granted by the ADA.


There are three main terms that are used to describe retaliation. Retaliation occurs when an employer, employment agency, or labor organization takes an adverse action against a covered individual because he or she engaged in a protected activity. These three terms are described below.



Adverse Action

An adverse action is an action taken to try to keep someone from opposing a discriminatory practice, or from participating in an employment discrimination proceeding. Examples of adverse actions include:

1. Employment actions such as termination, refusal to hire, and denial of promotion, other actions affecting employment such as threats, unjustified negative evaluations, unjustified negative references, or increased surveillance, and any other action such as an assault or unfounded civil or criminal charges that are likely to deter reasonable people from pursuing their rights.

2. Adverse actions do not include petty slights and annoyances, such as stray negative comments in an otherwise positive or neutral evaluation, "snubbing" a colleague, or negative comments that are justified by an employee's poor work performance or history.

3. Even if the prior protected activity alleged wrongdoing by a different employer, retaliatory adverse actions are unlawful. For example, it is unlawful for a worker's current employer to retaliate against him for pursuing an EEO charge against a former employer.

Tell your friend regardless of how he is treated to please documented and keep all the proof that he can.  If he is still working for this company, it is not uncommon that they will attempt to keep harassing him so that he will become a problem so that they can FIRE him.  It could really work for him if he would just keep taking this and taking this as long as it does not become physically illegal.  If his daughter get another SEXUAL email from this company or any other company, take it straight to the District Attorney's Office because anyone that does that is SICK. 

Now the EEOC states that: Employees are not excused from continuing to perform their jobs or follow their company's legitimate workplace rules just because they have filed a complaint with the EEOC or opposed discrimination.

Covered Individuals:

1. Covered individuals are people who have opposed unlawful practices, participated in proceedings, or requested accommodations related to employment discrimination based on race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, or disability. Individuals who have a close association with someone who has engaged in such protected activity also are covered individuals. For example, it is illegal to terminate an employee because his spouse participated in employment discrimination litigation.

2. Individuals who have brought attention to violations of law other than employment discrimination are NOT covered individuals for purposes of anti-discrimination retaliation laws. For example,"whistleblowers" who raise ethical, financial, or other concerns unrelated to employment discrimination are not protected by the EEOC enforced laws.

Protected activity includes:

1. Opposition is informing an employer that you believe that he/she is engaging in prohibited discrimination. Opposition is protected from retaliation as long as it is based on a reasonable, good-faith belief that the complained of practice violates anti-discrimination law; and the manner of the opposition is reasonable.

Examples of protected opposition include:

1. Complaining to anyone about alleged discrimination against oneself or others;


2. Threatening to file a charge of discrimination;


3. Picketing in opposition to discrimination; or


4. Refusing to obey an order reasonably believed to be discriminatory.


Examples of activities that are NOT protected opposition include:


1. Actions that interfere with job performance so as to render the employee ineffective.


2. Unlawful activities such as acts or threats of violence.



Participation in an employment discrimination proceeding.

Participation means taking part in an employment discrimination proceeding. Participation is protected activity even if the proceeding involved claims that ultimately were found to be invalid. Examples of participation include:

1. Filing a charge of employment discrimination.

2. Cooperating with an internal investigation of alleged discriminatory practices

3. Serving as a witness in an EEO investigation or litigation.

 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3

HE WAS DEFINITELY SEXUALLY HARASSED UNDER EEOC GUIDELINES

AUTHOR: Doug p. - (USA)

The guy that you are speaking of definitely have a case on Sexual Harassment.  The emails that he has is the KEY.  Now it's not just his word against their word, but you this guy has actual physical proof.  Please understand that with this government, they are always hearing how people were Sexually Harass, Discriminate and Retaliated by their employer and a lot of time it is not true.  If everything that I had been reading about this situation that your friend has been going through is true then he should receive payment for his pain and suffering.  I do not practice Law in New Jersey but if this company was sending this guy SEXUAL EMAILS so that his toddler daughter could see then it becomes CRIMINAL and he or they should be Criminally PROSECUTED.  


 


Sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination that violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII applies to employers with 15 or more employees, including state and local governments. It also applies to employment agencies and to labor organizations, as well as to the federal government.


Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when this conduct explicitly or implicitly affects an individual's employment, unreasonably interferes with an individual's work performance, or creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment.


Sexual harassment can occur in a variety of circumstances, including but not limited to the following:


1. The victim as well as the harasser may be a woman or a man. The victim does not have to be of the opposite sex.


2. The harasser can be the victim's supervisor, an agent of the employer, a supervisor in another area, a co-worker, or a non-employee.


3. The victim does not have to be the person harassed but could be anyone affected by the offensive conduct.


4. Unlawful sexual harassment may occur without economic injury to or discharge of the victim.


5. The harasser's conduct must be unwelcome.


It is helpful for the victim to inform the harasser directly that the conduct is unwelcome and must stop. The victim should use any employer complaint mechanism or grievance system available.


When investigating allegations of sexual harassment, EEOC looks at the whole record: the circumstances, such as the nature of the sexual advances, and the context in which the alleged incidents occurred. A determination on the allegations is made from the facts on a case-by-case basis.


Prevention is the best tool to eliminate sexual harassment in the workplace. Employers are encouraged to take steps necessary to prevent sexual harassment from occurring. They should clearly communicate to employees that sexual harassment will not be tolerated. They can do so by providing sexual harassment training to their employees and by establishing an effective complaint or grievance process and taking immediate and appropriate action when an employee complains.


It is also unlawful to retaliate against an individual for opposing employment practices that discriminate based on sex or for filing a discrimination charge, testifying, or participating in any way in an investigation, proceeding, or litigation under Title VII.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4

THIS GUY DEFINITELY GOT RACIALLY HARRASSED

AUTHOR: Doug p. - (U.S.A.)

 

Harassment is unwelcome conduct that is based on race, color, sex, religion, national origin, disability, and/or age. Harassment becomes unlawful where 1) enduring the offensive conduct becomes a condition of continued employment, or 2) the conduct is severe or pervasive enough to create a work environment that a reasonable person would consider intimidating, hostile, or abusive. Anti-discrimination laws also prohibit harassment against individuals in retaliation for filing a discrimination charge, testifying, or participating in any way in an investigation, proceeding, or lawsuit under these laws; or opposing employment practices that they reasonably believe discriminate against individuals, in violation of these laws.


Petty slights, annoyances, and isolated incidents (unless extremely serious) will not rise to the level of illegality. To be unlawful, the conduct must create a work environment that would be intimidating, hostile, or offensive to reasonable people.


Offensive conduct may include, but is not limited to, offensive jokes, slurs, epithets or name calling, physical assaults or threats, intimidation, ridicule or mockery, insults or put-downs, offensive objects or pictures, and interference with work performance. Harassment can occur in a variety of circumstances, including, but not limited to, the following:


1. The harasser can be the victim's supervisor, a supervisor in another area, an agent of the employer, a co-worker, or a non-employee.

 

2. The victim does not have to be the person harassed, but can be anyone affected by the offensive conduct.

 

3. Unlawful harassment may occur without economic injury to, or discharge of, the victim.

Prevention is the best tool to eliminate harassment in the workplace. Employers are encouraged to take appropriate steps to prevent and correct unlawful harassment. They should clearly communicate to employees that unwelcome harassing conduct will not be tolerated. They can do this by establishing an effective complaint or grievance process, providing anti-harassment training to their managers and employees, and taking immediate and appropriate action when an employee complains. Employers should strive to create an environment in which employees feel free to raise concerns and are confident that those concerns will be addressed.


Employees are encouraged to inform the harasser directly that the conduct is unwelcome and must stop. Employees should also report harassment to management at an early stage to prevent its escalation.


The employer is automatically liable for harassment by a supervisor that results in a negative employment action such as termination, failure to promote or hire, and loss of wages. If the supervisor's harassment results in a hostile work environment, the employer can avoid liability only if it can prove that: 1) it reasonably tried to prevent and promptly correct the harassing behavior; and 2) the employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventive or corrective opportunities provided by the employer.


The employer will be liable for harassment by non-supervisory employees or non-employees over whom it has control (e.g., independent contractors or customers on the premises), if it knew, or should have known about the harassment and failed to take prompt and appropriate corrective action.


When investigating allegations of harassment, the EEOC looks at the entire record: including the nature of the conduct, and the context in which the alleged incidents occurred. A determination of whether harassment is severe or pervasive enough to be illegal is made on a case-by-case basis.


If you believe that the harassment you are experiencing or witnessing is of a specifically sexual nature, you may want to see EEOC's information on sexual harassment.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.