Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #65639

Complaint Review: NewRemoteControl.com - Thomasville Georgia

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Savannah Georgia
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • NewRemoteControl.com 623 Cambell Street Thomasville, Georgia U.S.A.

NewRemoteControl.com Bad Business Practices, Unfriendly Customer Policies, Defective Products Thomasville Georgia

*Author of original report: After a little more philosophical discussion on this subject, Charles agreed to provide me with a standing credit

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I ordered a replacement remote control from this company. The first remote control they shipped was defective. I contacted the company and was told to return the remote and that it would be tested and if found defective a replacement would be sent.

I sent back the remote and had to pay $4.30 for return shipping charges. A second remote was sent to me a few days later. The second remote functioned properly. I emailed Missy Smith, whose name was on the email I received from this company that confirmed the order, requesting a refund of the shipping charge. I never received a reply.

I emailed a second time about two weeks later again requesting the refund. Again no reply and no refund. I called the number listed under Missy's name - it was the WRONG number. I went to their website and obtained the correct number and now incurred a long distance charge to call this company to request a refund for the third time.

I initially spoke to Jana and she then transferred my call to Paul. He advised me that their company policy does not allow refund of shipping charges, even if the charge was incurred due to the return of a defective product. He said they don't make the remotes and that the manufacturers warranty applies to defects and that they offer the exchange as a courtesy. He tried to use the example that if I bought a defective television from Wal-Mart that I would have to return the television to the manufacturer and not Wal-Mart.

I advised him that this is not true; that if I purchased a product from Wal-Mart that was defective out of the box, they will gladly refund or exchange the item. I told him that while $4.30 was not that much money, when applied to the $19.95 price that I paid for the remote (unit price plus shipping) it represented almost 20% of the purchase price and that this was significant.

Paul kept reiterating that they are not the manufacturer and will only exchange or refund less shipping charges. I then advised him that I bought a refurbished remote from him and asked him if they tested their refurbished products. He advised that they did. I then stated that his company should then be liable for the products they test. He said they are happy to exhange or refund the purchase price of the product but not shipping charges. I said this is a bad business practice and asked him if he was willing to let $4.30 stand in the way of me doing future business with him. He said he was.

My complaint is this - a customer should not have to incur ANY expense for a product that is defective out of the box. Regardless of a company's stated policy, it is ALWAYS the best policy to satisfy the customer when their request is fair and reasonable. This company needs to modify their policy on paying customer's return shipping charges and definately needs to learn how to SATISFY the customer.

Yes, this company does have a published and stated policy that says the customer is liable for return shipping charges which includes warranty returns and exchanges. It is on their website and you have to go looking for it. I did not read this policy prior to my purchase which was my mistake. Had I been aware of this policy I probably wouldn't have purchased from them.

I have a problem against any company who is going to charge me return shipping for a product that is defective upon receipt. My advice is - DON'T DO BUSINESS WITH ELECTRONIC REPAIR SERVICE or NewRemoteControl.com! If you happen to have no problems with the products you buy from this company then everything is fine. But be prepared to incur return shipping charges should you receive merchandise that doesn't work when you receive it and accept the fact that the personnel of this company doesn't care about fairness or earning your satisfaction.

Dave
Savannah, Georgia
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 08/12/2003 02:30 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/newremotecontrolcom/thomasville-georgia-31792/newremotecontrolcom-bad-business-practices-unfriendly-customer-policies-defective-produ-65639. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#1 Author of original report

After a little more philosophical discussion on this subject, Charles agreed to provide me with a standing credit

AUTHOR: Dave - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Monday, October 27, 2003

I called this company again and spoke to Charles Chambers who is listed as their Customer Service contact. Charles was sympathetic to my complaint about having to pay return shipping charges for a product that was defective out of the box. He explained that for the most part they don't have any trouble with the products they test and ship but occasionally a product will go out that is defective. He also explained that they have very low profit margins for the type of product I purchased and it they would make no profit if they had to pay for return shipping charges. I told him I understood the low profit margin but that it is the responsibility of the merchant and not the consumer to have to incur any costs for a product that is defective. I explained that this responsiblity is simply a cost of doing business and earning customer satisfaction. I told him no customer is going to be happy having to pay addtional charges for a product that was defective upon receipt. After a little more philosophical discussion on this subject, Charles agreed to provide me with a standing credit, in the amount of the shipping charge I incureed, good toward a future purchase from them. I accepted this as a fair settlement and will give them another opportunity in the future to earn my business. I still maintain, however, that no company should ever let $4.30 cents stand in the way of earning customer satisfaction. I'm sure this company will survive their current policy on returns, etc. but just think of how great they could be if earning "complete customer satisfaction" was their mantra.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now