Complaint Review: Scott Hinote, Attorney at Law, Ozark, MO - Ozark Missouri
- Scott Hinote, Attorney at Law, Ozark, MO 100 North Second Ozark, Missouri United States of America
- Phone: 4175822022
- Web:
- Category: Attorneys & Legal Services
Scott Hinote, Attorney at Law, Ozark, MO Would Not Refund Court Fees For Which He Didn't File Ozark, Missouri
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: NOT EVEN A CLIENT
*Author of original report: Refund Issued
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
My wife and I rushed into the idea of getting a divorce without much discussion on many things going on in our lives. The divorce was going to be uncontested and I tried to get her to go through Family Mediation Services of Springfield (((link redacted))), which offers divorce solutions for uncontested divorce. My wife decided to go through Scott Hinote, and instructed me her attorney would contact me.
Knowing who her attorney was, I went to his office on Monday morning and informed him I wasn't going to contest the divorce. And told him I would cooperate with him and sign the papers. This was going to be one of the easiest divorces he had ever done--no assets, no children, and no contest.
When my wife went in there a few hours later, Hinote embellished things describing the situation as hostile. Please remember, I instructed Hinote this was going to be a no contest divorce and that I would sign papers and cooperate with him. Obviously, Mr. Hinote understands that art of rhetoric and how to embellish in order to ensure he receives a check without hesitation.
The next day, Hinote's office called and expected me to drop everything with thirty minutes notice to come in and sign papers. When I told them I could't be there in 30 minutes, they asked if I could be there by 2:00. It was 1:00 PM. I told them no, and the woman who called me was rude and seemed like she was inconvenienced by my decision not to rush to Ozark at her demand. I told her I would call her back. I remind you once again, this was going to be an uncontested divorce.
I called her back and told her I would stop in on Friday morning. By Wednesday, I was missing my wife and was really having second thoughts about this divorce. We had turned to so many people looking for answers, and nothing was working out, but the one thing we hadn't turned to was God and the Bible. My wife must have been feeling the same thing. I fought calling her, and she eventually text messaged me that afternoon. Within 24 hours, we called the divorce off, and on Friday, I called Hinote's office letting him know I would not be in to sign papers. His office immediately called my wife to confirm.
At this point, Hinote had already collected $500 for his fees and $90 to file. We inquired about a partial refund and a total refund of the court fees, which he never filed and for services he didn't complete. Hinote's office was slow to respond, and when they did he complained that he had to endure a hostile environment. However, this was always an uncontested divorce, and I up until Wednesday was always going into his office to sign the papers so he wouldn't have to have a deputy sign the papers. Describing this situation as hostile, Hinote said he would not refund his fees, but he would refund the $90 fee according to my wife.
Hinote justified the $500 as his time, yet you can download divorce papers issued by the state of Missouri and have them filled out in less than an hour. It's not brain surgery. Filling out the paperwork is only half the effort. When we realized we weren't going to get a partial refund of that money, we did give him money to pay the court filing fee. This money never went to the courts and Hinote to date still is in possession of it.
Now many weeks later, we still wait for the court fees to be refunded, and Hinote is ignoring any request we have made, both through telephone calls and e-mails, for the court fees. The sad thing is, before this we have referred people to his office, which we will not do anymore, and this is the thanks we get. We won't refer anyone else to Mr. Hinote.
To be fair, we think a refund of $250 plus the $90 court fee is just. At this point, we would just be happy to get the court fees back that Hinote is in possession of since he never filed the paperwork with the court.
CLICK here to see why Rip-off Report, as a matter of policy, deleted either a phone number, link or e-mail address from this Report.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 09/25/2011 03:21 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/scott-hinote-attorney-at-law-ozark-mo/ozark-missouri-65721/scott-hinote-attorney-at-law-ozark-mo-would-not-refund-court-fees-for-which-he-didnt-781142. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:



#2 REBUTTAL Owner of company
NOT EVEN A CLIENT
AUTHOR: Scott Hinote - ()
SUBMITTED: Friday, October 31, 2014
The person making this report was not even a client for Hinote Law Firm. His wife was my client who did not file this claim nor did she have any comlaint of this Law Firm. Notwithstanding this person's claim, his wife not only wished to have a divorce against him but also a request for a Protection Order. This Law Office assisted his wife with her requests. Some time later they reconciled and her husband, again a non-client, demanded full reimbursement of what was paid to this Law Office notwithstanding the fact the work was performed on my client's matter. Upon being told the word "no" this non-client then made up this complaint. I threatened to sue him for his defamation of character and only did not based upon the request of my client, his wife. He did try to retract his false statement but this site would not allow him to do such due to their policies. It is a shame anyone can place anything on the Internet to harm another person or company with no ramifications. This Law Office works hard for its clients and owes no duty to other individuals who do not retain our services.

#1 Author of original report
Refund Issued
AUTHOR: CBow - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, October 02, 2011
BBB works. In less than a week after posting our complaint, our refund was issued. It took 60 days, but we got it.


Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.