Complaint Review: Storquest Self Storage - Palm Springs California
- Storquest Self Storage 2711 Tamarisk Rd Palm Springs, California U.S.A.
- Phone: 760-323-4655
- Web:
- Category: Storage & Self Storage
Storquest Self Storage Storage Facility Users Beware - Damaged Goods, No Liability ripoff Palm Springs California
*Consumer Suggestion: Possible explanation for damage
*Consumer Suggestion: Cregg Vs MiniStor Ventures 1983
*Consumer Suggestion: Cregg Vs MiniStor Ventures 1983
*Consumer Suggestion: Cregg Vs MiniStor Ventures 1983
*Consumer Suggestion: Cregg Vs MiniStor Ventures 1983
*Author of original report: Pictures can be seen at the following:
*Author of original report: Storquest's Idea of Compensation
*Consumer Suggestion: Don't give up yet - I manage a self-storage facility
*Consumer Suggestion: Don't give up yet - I manage a self-storage facility
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
StorQuest Self Storage Facility Users Beware.
I rented a storage unit on 8/28/2005 from StorQuest Self Storage on Tamarisk Rd in Palm Springs to store extra mattresses and additional house items. I stored 3 Queen mattresses and 1 Full mattress along the with box springs for all.
On 12/6/2006 I went to the facility to rearrange the stored items because I had somebody interested in purchasing these mattresses. They were all almost brand new.
When I opened the unit, all the mattresses had been damaged because water had somehow leaked into the unit. THe mattresses were wrapped in mattress bags, but the water had seeped into the portion of the bags resting on the floor and, in the summer heat, created a steamy breeding ground for mold and mildew. Needless to say, the mattresses (over $2000 in value) are unusable.
StoreQuest claims they have no idea where the water came from, and came close to telling me that I stored damaged mattresses.
The clerk at the facility was of no help other than to be sympathetic to my issue, but could not offer me anything other than to say she would work to try and get me a free month and made it clear they were not liable and the contract was clear.
I was offered the phone number of the corporate office, Williams Warren Group, and to date, after 3 phone calls to their support line, stating that my call was important and to leave my number, I have yet to get a call back. ( I guess its not that important) !
STORAGE USERS BEWARE! These facilities (StorQuest is not alone) DO NOT HAVE ANY RESPONSIBILITY WHAT-SO-EVER. There contracts are very clear that you have no rights other than to pay them too much money so they can potentially damage your possessions.
Upon further investigation it looks like lawyers and consumer groups offer this advise! Get Storage Facility insurance if you are going to store stuff. Advise that the Storage Facilities don't seem to offer so as not to raise any concern that you are storing at your own risk!
Needless to say, now I have to pay to rent a truck and pay to dump these useless things all at my expense. Not to mention the $1000 plus I paid StorQuest to "protect" my valuables.
Think twice before you use a storage unit!
Mark
Palm Springs, California
U.S.A.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 12/08/2006 06:40 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/storquest-self-storage/palm-springs-california-92262/storquest-self-storage-storage-facility-users-beware-damaged-goods-no-liability-ripoff-224434. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:



#9 Consumer Suggestion
Possible explanation for damage
AUTHOR: Tom-storage Expert - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, April 01, 2009
I have been in the self storage industry since 1965 and have seen your problem on several occasions. When mattresses are placed in mattress bags and sealed, many consumers erroneously seal in moisture. Once the mattress is placed into a self storage space, such as in this case, in a very hot climate, the moisture begins to create mold. In an environment such as the Palm Springs area, this process is much more likely.
While the complaintant may not have liked the response from management, remember that the complaintant maintained care, custody and control over the unit and the management had no way to determine if a loss was occurring, whether caused by a latent defect in the building or by the tenants own actions. Part of what we purchase when we rent storage space is the commensurate level of privacy and autonomy of "serving" ourselves. This type of damage is not uncommon at virtually every self storage facility in the world. It is therefore incumbent on the tenant to occasionally visit their storage space and to determine if damage is occurring.
Lastly, I know the principals personally at StorQuest and can attest that they are principled, honest individuals that I would consider to be above average as self storage owners and operators.

#8 Consumer Suggestion
Cregg Vs MiniStor Ventures 1983
AUTHOR: Chuck - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, February 15, 2009
Mark,
The Calfornia courts ruled in Cregg V. MiniStor Ventures 1983 that the storage facilities have no liability IF they offered you an insurance product.
IF they did not, you will most likely win a lawsuit.
But if you checked the box declining insurance, you'd be out of luck and a lot of attorneys fees for both sides if you sue in Superior court.
What usually happens is people will sue in Small claims and win a judgement. Then the facility will appeal to Superior Court (there is no municipal court in Calfornia anymore) and they will win in Superior Court if you signed a paper declining insurance.
The moral of the story is to have insurance coverage if you cannot afford to replace your belongings.

#7 Consumer Suggestion
Cregg Vs MiniStor Ventures 1983
AUTHOR: Chuck - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, February 15, 2009
Mark,
The Calfornia courts ruled in Cregg V. MiniStor Ventures 1983 that the storage facilities have no liability IF they offered you an insurance product.
IF they did not, you will most likely win a lawsuit.
But if you checked the box declining insurance, you'd be out of luck and a lot of attorneys fees for both sides if you sue in Superior court.
What usually happens is people will sue in Small claims and win a judgement. Then the facility will appeal to Superior Court (there is no municipal court in Calfornia anymore) and they will win in Superior Court if you signed a paper declining insurance.
The moral of the story is to have insurance coverage if you cannot afford to replace your belongings.

#6 Consumer Suggestion
Cregg Vs MiniStor Ventures 1983
AUTHOR: Chuck - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, February 15, 2009
Mark,
The Calfornia courts ruled in Cregg V. MiniStor Ventures 1983 that the storage facilities have no liability IF they offered you an insurance product.
IF they did not, you will most likely win a lawsuit.
But if you checked the box declining insurance, you'd be out of luck and a lot of attorneys fees for both sides if you sue in Superior court.
What usually happens is people will sue in Small claims and win a judgement. Then the facility will appeal to Superior Court (there is no municipal court in Calfornia anymore) and they will win in Superior Court if you signed a paper declining insurance.
The moral of the story is to have insurance coverage if you cannot afford to replace your belongings.

#5 Consumer Suggestion
Cregg Vs MiniStor Ventures 1983
AUTHOR: Chuck - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, February 15, 2009
Mark,
The Calfornia courts ruled in Cregg V. MiniStor Ventures 1983 that the storage facilities have no liability IF they offered you an insurance product.
IF they did not, you will most likely win a lawsuit.
But if you checked the box declining insurance, you'd be out of luck and a lot of attorneys fees for both sides if you sue in Superior court.
What usually happens is people will sue in Small claims and win a judgement. Then the facility will appeal to Superior Court (there is no municipal court in Calfornia anymore) and they will win in Superior Court if you signed a paper declining insurance.
The moral of the story is to have insurance coverage if you cannot afford to replace your belongings.

#4 Author of original report
Pictures can be seen at the following:
AUTHOR: Mark - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, January 11, 2007
http://webmac.com/casinoowl/iweb/storquest

#3 Author of original report
Storquest's Idea of Compensation
AUTHOR: Mark - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, January 11, 2007
Storquest issued a check for the last month's rent. A $75.00 check. $2000 lost in mattresses, Approx $1000 in fees over the year. $75.00 barely covered the truck rental and dump fees to get rid of the damaged mattresses.
More to follow!

#2 Consumer Suggestion
Don't give up yet - I manage a self-storage facility
AUTHOR: Larry - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, December 09, 2006
I manage a self-storage facility for a regional management company not affiliated with Storquest.
Nearly all self-storage facilities go to great lengths to inform the tenant at move-in that they do not insure your property. They usually will then try to sell you an overpriced policy that will never pay off for anything. If you have homeowner's or renter's insurance your stuff may be covered under that policy. Check with your agent.
Self-storage operators insist that they are not liable for any damages ever. I would advise you to consult an attorney before accepting that explanation. You bargained for a place that is suitable for storage of your belongings. The storage space you got was not suitable as it had water leaks. If the leaks were the result of faulty design, construction, or maintenance it would seem that there was a breach of contract.
If I were in your shoes I would file a lawsuit in small claims court. Chances are pretty good that Storquest's insurance company will pay rather than fight as long as you limit the damages to the value of the mattresses and your costs of disposing of them.
The company I work for rented out a storage unit with a leaky roof. The tenant sued and the company's insurance paid off.

#1 Consumer Suggestion
Don't give up yet - I manage a self-storage facility
AUTHOR: Larry - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, December 09, 2006
I manage a self-storage facility for a regional management company not affiliated with Storquest.
Nearly all self-storage facilities go to great lengths to inform the tenant at move-in that they do not insure your property. They usually will then try to sell you an overpriced policy that will never pay off for anything. If you have homeowner's or renter's insurance your stuff may be covered under that policy. Check with your agent.
Self-storage operators insist that they are not liable for any damages ever. I would advise you to consult an attorney before accepting that explanation. You bargained for a place that is suitable for storage of your belongings. The storage space you got was not suitable as it had water leaks. If the leaks were the result of faulty design, construction, or maintenance it would seem that there was a breach of contract.
If I were in your shoes I would file a lawsuit in small claims court. Chances are pretty good that Storquest's insurance company will pay rather than fight as long as you limit the damages to the value of the mattresses and your costs of disposing of them.
The company I work for rented out a storage unit with a leaky roof. The tenant sued and the company's insurance paid off.


Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.