web traffic marketing webtafficmarketing SCAM PROOF SCAMMER RIP OFF THEIVES BOGUS CRIMINALS THIEVES bulk email email blast email marketing opt in email list company SCAM SCAMMER RIP OFF THEIVES BOGUS CRIMINALS THIEVES Internet

Not only do they not send emails out to the claimed 2.7 million safe list. But after you catch them they make it impossible to claim a refund. These guys are pretty elaborate in the depth of their scam. They have set up reviews for different bulk emailing companies rating the service. However they "are" the companies in the review. They only charge $40 bucks or so to allow you to blast out your email to a claimed 2 million or so per day and most people already have traffic coming to their website. If you already have traffic coming then as normal fluctuation occurs you might think it boosted your hits...But if you have no traffic yet as I did and I mailed out 2.7 million emails per day for 5 days straight and the only IP addresses hitting my website was me continually searching for the results. My website gave me IP address, date, time, etc. After 13,500,000 supposedly sent emails not 1 hit to my website. They have you submit 2 email addresses one for their support and the other to put yourself on this 2.7 million list as you are supposed to be receiving every other members offers too. Only the only offers you receive are the ones coming directly from the scamsters themselves trying to hook you on other scams. They have also created a pay company called PayGear to funnel their money through. When I went to PayGear because web traffic marketing would not return my emails/refund then they tried to act like they were separate thieves. I will do a whole different report on paygear after I do this. Stay away from any company offering to send out millions of emails through their server for a minimal price. Think about it as I did. 2.7 million emails and 1/1000th of 1% response still equals to 270 hits to your offer. All for $40 lifetime and multiplying that number by a daily 2.7 million emails should have equaled to :TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE"