Justice denied without proper government representation!!

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon: Bucks County Justice Center, 100 North Main Street, Doylestown, PA 18901 COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BUCKS COUNTY Filed with the Court Clerk in prothonotary office in the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BUCKS COUNTY. Sent certified mail by Peter Sauers of 32 N. Westview Ave Feasterville pa. 19053.

Bell Atlantic Corp vs. Twombly. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States involving antitrust law and civil procedure. established that parallel conduct, absent evidence of agreement, pleading requirement for civil cases.

Requiring for Plaintiff include enough facts in their complaint to make it plausible, not merely possible. Plaintiff meets his burden of requirements for Reconsiderations and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Taxpayer funded Investigations revealed: Francis X. Dillon Begley Carlin & amp; Mandio, LLP ...Mr. Dillon serves as the Services Commission. Solicitor for Lower Southampton Township stated: & quot; Although a taxpayer-funded investigation was completed and available, the municipal planning code was not followed.

Mr. Dillon said the MPC sets procedures regarding what municipalities are supposed to do regarding the & quot;land development fee schedule, & rdquo; which was not updated to reflect the change in the state law, so state law was also disregarded in my opinion.

Look to 352 U.S. 112 (1956) & nbsp;WALKER. CITY OF HUTCHINSON ET AL. No. 13. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 15-16, 1956. Decided December 10, 1956. Notice so published in the official newspaper was not sufficient notice to satisfy the requirements of the Due Process clauses of both Federal and State Constitutions.

Honorable Judge Hon Judge Wallace Bateman and All Officers of the Court: Chief justice Bhandari once affirmed Justice delayed is justice denied. Someone from the Courts and judiciary must recognize the cases for what it is; a call for justice and a protest against Public Officials and Private Individuals, which caused civil damages, cry for equal justice, Due process and constitutional rights.

There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional rights. The Judge responsibilities are clear. Superior authorities clear the way for fair procedures, equal justice, Access to Courts, with proper government representation to repair the damages from political corruption and corruption that can be overlooked.

The sordid facts of the case and the convicted parties thereto are widely reported in Court documents, Investigations, Public Documents, local news, newspapers etc. Officials have made legal grounds for civil damages, the responsible of Honorable Judge Hon Judge Wallace Bateman Court to take actions to protect the superior authorities that is long overdue.

Some Public Official participants in the scheme leading to these cases have been convicted and gone to jail, some got fired, some lost political positions and others took obligatory questionable retirements. Based on new facts that were not know and in existence at the time of the original case action filed HONORABLE JUDGE WALLACE BATEMAN REASSIGNED.

April 8 2016, ORDER on or about: Filed April 18, 2016 Defendant & #39;s, Lower Southampton Township and Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice that was granted by HONORABLE JUDGE WALLACE BATEMAN (Based on his opinion.)

HONORABLE Judge actions was prematurely, on a 12(b)(6). Any action would have to be after April 12, 2017 or later and NOT before. (Because of lack of information) Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) Note: By law, a judge is a state officer.

The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person). When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the Judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judges & #39; orders are not voidable, but VOID, and of no legal force or effect. The U.S. Supreme Court stated that when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct.

The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States. by an officer & #39;s interpretation of the law under which he presumes to act. & quot; -/ 42 U.S.C. & sect; 1983 does not independently create substantive rights, but rather merely & quot;provides a remedy for deprivations of rights established elsewhere in the Constitution(s) or federal laws.

Pro-se Plaintiff Hereby re-affirms the original assertions made in the Original Complaint, violation of a right secured by the Constitution and deprivation was committed by a person acting under color of state law duty of care in breaching that duty of care Plaintiff suffered injuries, were the result of Defendant breach of duty.

Some Public Official participants in the scheme leading to these cases have been convicted and gone to jail, some got fired, some lost political positions and others took obligatory questionable retirements or resigned. Responsibility of the civil damages also involved State Actors as well Public Officials. 

Based on new facts that were not know and in existence at the time of the original case action and civil damages that occurred well Public Official participants with private individuals filled their pockets at the expense of the Lower Southampton Townspeople, I was overpowered but The truth stands even if there is no public support (Mahatma Gandhi).

Political and administrative corruption can plague even the most civilized nation in the world and can hamper the lawful functioning of the government. However, there ought to be a legal recourse and remedy for ordinary citizens who suffer damage because of political corruption.  The remedy would be to have equal access to the courts with state sponsored adequate representation for the ordinary citizen in pro-se civil cases at par with & nbsp;criminal cases, when the criminals are Government Officials otherwise deprives one of equal protection.

& nbsp;

Redfield v Fisher 292 P 813, at 819 [1930] ...an officer may be held liable in damages to any person injured in consequence of a breach of any of the duties in office is in his & #39;individual & #39;, not his official capacity... & quot; this includes Officers of the Court in this case. connected with his office...The liability for nonfeasance-misfeasance, and for malfeasance Unsworn falsification to Authorities and Federal Authorities and the Intentional dishonest act by not fulfilling legal or contractual obligations, misleading another, entering- into an agreement-without the intention or means to fulfill it, or violating basic standards of honesty in dealing with others. Procedural due process is a legal doctrine in the United States that requires government officials to follow fair procedures before depriving a person of life, liberty, or property.

The Petitioner / Pro-se Plaintiff Hereby re-affirms the original assertions made in the Original Complaint and all Related actions, requests this court to treat the Original Complaint and actions as part and parcel of this present in all actions. Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925) B.Platsky v. CIA, 953 F.2d & nbsp; 25, 26 28 (2nd Cir. 1991), Court errs if court dismisses pro se litigant without instruction of how pleadings are deficient and how to repair pleadings.

The Court of Common Pleas failed to do this so far, I`m a pro se litigant requesting Court of Common Pleas do so as not to create errors in this Reconsiderations, Appeal, etc. (Plaintiff Objection) Preliminary Objection shows errors Di Sarrio v. Mills, 711 So.2d 1355 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) Unsworn argument by counsel simply & ldquo;is not evidence. 

On the other hand, Principal cases are clear and recognized by all Courts not to be overlooked as law of the land a supreme authority. This under no circumstances has this been out of the courts and to this point is uncompleted. Honorable Judge Hon Judge Wallace Bateman needs to reopen case under the outstanding motion and update his ORDER Filed April 18, 2016 that  in error now for civil damages. A jury trial would be appropriate.

I Peter Sauers duly understand that false statements made herein are subject to the penalties of law. I will file this with all appropriate interested parties and on-line.

Date September 26, 2022

Regards,

Peter Sauers 32N.Westview Ave Feasterville pa. 19053 Thank You for reading.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CERTIFIED MAIL

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon: Bucks County Justice Center, 100 North Main Street, Doylestown, PA 18901 COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BUCKS COUNTY

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon: Lower Southampton Township, 1500 Desire Avenue, Feasterville, PA 19053; to Mr. Francis X. Dillon.