Complaint Review: Grundy workdwide
Grundy workdwide Classic car insurance I put in a claim for I sent I got driving to a show I drove over a pipe or somthing. It flew up in to my wheel well and folded my quarter panel in They told me there not paying because where quarter was connected there was rid so that's considered wear and tear I said what about my dented up quarter panel they said sorry wear and tear not paying you don't use them all the way up to the supervisor level they are rude and will not talk to you it' makes sense why there located in sham Pennsylvania on sham rd the whole thing is a shame it was on my 69 camaro Horsesham Pennsylvania
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
Click here now..
Was on the way to show and hit somthing in the road it flew up in drivers side quarter panel and wrecked my quarter panel Called insurance they never called back then they sent slimy adjuster out and finally they email me saying it's wear and tear Sorry we're not paying you what a sham they said because there was some rust it's a 1969 camaro and what the heck does that have to do with peace of pipe hitting my quarter panel how is that wear and tear???????? Crooks I have never herd that in my life !!!!! Do not use grundy world wide they use all contractors and they don't care .
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/11/2017 06:44 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/grundy-workdwide/horsesham-pennsylvania-19044/grundy-workdwide-classic-car-insurance-i-put-in-a-claim-for-i-sent-i-got-driving-to-a-sh-1405722. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here: