Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #898863

Complaint Review: JR Media Services - Burbank California

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Erin — Vancouver Washington United States of America
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • JR Media Services 2501 W. Burbank Blvd., Suite 200 Burbank, California United States of America

JR Media Services Max Beno Refused to pay on time according to their own "net 30" policy. Burbank, California

*Author of original report: Payment Received

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Simple enough: Max Beno and JR Media Services tell vendors that they pay according to a "net 30" policy. However, in the nearly one year that I have been doing subcontractor work for this company, I have been paid on an invoice within 30 days very, very rarely. At the moment, I have 11 invoices past due, most of which are 40+ days late. They total $2,529.10 of the $3,963.10 that the company currently owes me. I have no reason to believe any of it will be paid on time.

When confronted with these issues, JR Media Services, and particularly Max Beno, have a number of tactics. First, it was illuminating me on "net 30" policy (because I had expected immediate payment). Then, when payments didn't arrive within the promised 30 days, or anywhere near it, and I complained about it, Beno contacted me via phone and proceeded to condescend to me.

I was informed that I obviously don't understand what it means to be an independent contractor, and that it was "ridiculous" that I would assume any payment would actually be in my hands on day 30. I encourage Beno to actually look up any net 30 policy and find that he's completely wrong about this claim. The third tactic, and the one I'm dealing with now, is to just ignore the one complaining.

Legal action is my next step, but I want everyone to know that when you are considering working for JR Media Services and you Google it and  find that the first results are from this site and another that claims essentially the same thing, you should not ignore those red flags as I did. This company is horribly run; I have not encountered one competent person there, and I fully expect that it will take legal action for me to get any of my remaining payments.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 06/17/2012 07:56 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/jr-media-services/burbank-california-/jr-media-services-max-beno-refused-to-pay-on-time-according-to-their-own-net-30-policy-898863. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author
0Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#1 Author of original report

Payment Received

AUTHOR: Anon - (United States of America)

POSTED: Friday, August 03, 2012

After being ignored for days, then begging for a few more, I was finally able to convince the company to FedEx me what they had been negligent in paying. They sent the check, which included invoices that were roughly 60 days old at that point, but offered no apology or explanation for the situation. 

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now