X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now
Ripoff Report | Mnl truck sales Review - Gulf port, Mississippi
Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1284760

Complaint Review: mnl truck sales - gulf port Mississippi

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Ronny — mountain view Arkansas USA
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • mnl truck sales gulf port, Mississippi USA

mnl truck sales gulf port Mississippi

*Consumer Suggestion: Regarding non-refundable deposits

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Click here now..

 while looking to purchase a used dump truck. I came across an ad for mnl truck sales. After a couple of phone calls. They offered me a lease. After paying the $505.00 deposit. They informed the lease would be $800.00 a week. We could not agree on price. So I refused the lease. Then I was informed that since I did not lease from my them. The deposit was not refundable.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 02/03/2016 01:18 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/mnl-truck-sales/gulf-port-mississippi/mnl-truck-sales-gulf-port-mississippi-1284760. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#1 Consumer Suggestion

Regarding non-refundable deposits

AUTHOR: Insider Lawyer - (USA)

POSTED: Wednesday, November 30, 2016

In Kuish v. Smith (2010) 181 CA4th 1419 a California appellate court was faced with the issue of whether a deposit became “non-refundable” merely by labeling it as such. The court began by looking at the issue of whether a Buyer’s deposit could properly be considered nonrefundable, even though the purchase contract did not have a liquidated damages clause. Despite Seller’s argument that it was nonrefundable based on the language of their contract, the court held that, absent a valid liquidated damages provision, any contract provision by which money or property is forfeited without regard to the actual damage suffered would be an unenforceable penalty. Because the parties had expressly stipulated that no liquidated damages clause existed in their contract, and Seller suffered no actual damage as a result of Buyer’s breach, the court ruled that Seller’s retention of the $600,000 “nonrefundable” portion of the deposit constituted an invalid forfeiture. Based off of my experience, every state treats the issue of nonrefundable deposits in a different way. Whether or not you will be able to get a refund on your deposit largely depends on whether your state is consumer or business friendly.  

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.