Robert Louis Miller, Robert L. Miller attorney is a liar and a rip off, takes your money and does nothing for your case Santa Ana California

In addition to my comments on this horrible attorney, I would like to report that my case was ultimitely DISMISSED after hiring a competent attorney who cared enough to fight for me.  Hiring Robert Louis Miller was a waste of money and time, and cost me a fortune.  My new attorney got my case dismissed.  Further proof of Robert louis millers incompetence.

Proof attorney Robert Louis Miller is seriously misguided.

Robert Louis Miller's libelous comments prove he is factually challenged. His comments here are absolutely absurd, false and further proof that he did not know the facts of my case and didn't read a word of it.

His MIS-representation of me in 2006 was disingenuous at best and criminal at worst. He lied to me by telling me the Prosecutor and judge were going to put me in jail if I did not cop a plea to the FALSE and FRAUDULENT charges against me. By his own internal notes page that he handed to me during arbitration, he states: the prosecutor is not looking at any jail time, but get her to cop a plea by holding jail time over her head - this is FRAUD. Since there was NEVER any real threat of my going to jail for these FRAUDULENT CHARGES AGAINST ME - Miller's incorrect comment here about keeping me out of jail is complete and utter nonsense.

Again and I repeat, Mr. Miller had proof and declarations of my innocence. I was proven to be with friends and family members while my ex-boyfriend and his convicted felon business partner were sending email and making phone calls to my ex-boyfriend. I was not doing any of it. Yet he chose to do whatever the prosecutor told him to do. I was proven to be other places including with my family at the hospital at my father's bedside before he passed away while my ex-boyfriend was emailing and calling himself in order to set me up.

Of 25 faked phone calls that my ex-boyfriend was actually making to himself through a computer, all but 4 were dropped. So if 21 counts were dismissed because I was not the one making them via this web site that the ex-boyfriend set up himself, how is it that I was making the other 4? I wasn't. The ridiculous allegation that had me in two different cities at the same time went unnoticed by Robert L Miller, the prosecutor, and the judge. Because no one ever bothered to read the absurdity of it. I called him out on it in court but he ignored me and told me to be quiet and plead No contest. I guess looking back I should have asked the dishonest prosecutor to specify which city I was supposed to have been in, in order to clarify the fraudulent charge.

Prosecutor Sharon Panian has to win her cases, false or not. And the people posting comments about her stalking a married police officer are people who know her. I knew nothing of her disturbing stalking behavior until reading the posts about her. But I find it fascinating.

Further Prosecutor Sharon Panian had an eye-witness give her facts of my whereabouts during another false accusation that I was sending email to the ex-boyfriend. Panian lied to the judge, she withheld the information that she was just given by a friend and neighbor who is also himself and attorney. The email in question was apparently sent to my ex-boyfriend by one of his co-workers who later denied sending it. I do not know this person to have made up his name, it was another false allegation. And the Detective in charge lied to the judge about it's origin. Claiming that it came from me yet in the same sentence he stated he couldn't trace it.

The Detective in the case made several false and fraudulent statements about what actually transpired and I have already mentioned them here. Miller knew the police reports written by the Detective were false and told me AND the arbitrator that his intention was to filed a motion to dismiss due to the false statement in the search warrant application. But claimed he didn't have time.

Further proof that he has the facts of my case completely disjointed: He stated that David L Hadjes is my ex boyfriend! David L Hadjes was NEVER my ex-Boyfriend! This is undeniable Proof he is incoherent and has the facts completely wrong. David L Hadjes is the CONVICTED FELON Business partner of my ex-boyfriend. Since he did not read nor familiarize himself with the facts of my case he was incapable of defending me. THIS is called ineffective assistance of counsel. David L Hadjes apparently has also fled Arkansas leaving behind 2 ex-wives and a number of creditors and law suites.

Miller is sidestepping the fact that he was sued by another woman for malpractice, fraud, and negligence and that there are several complaints about his services as an attorney on the Better Business Bureau.

It's pathetic how clueless he is and incapable of recognizing his own shortcomings. But I guess when you have payments due to a Trustee for a Million dollar bankruptcy you'll do and say anything to potential clients in order to get them to give you money!

His FALSE accusations that I am posting comments all over the internet are absolutely not true. It is Mr. Miller posting lies about me and my case. He is a fraud, he is a liar and his comments here prove it.

Further proof of his lies and misinformation: Mr. Miller did not represent me in a case in 2000. The case he did represent me in was in 2003 and was DISMISSED by the judge. It was proven to be false and he knows this. His statements here are not only completely false but libelous. He uses the words priors which is a bad choice of words. If you want to talk about priors lets talk about the Law Suite against you for Fraud, Malpractice and Negligence.

The only thing inconceivable about this matter is the fact the Mr. Miller is allowed to practice law in the first place. He should have his license revoked and should be disbarred for his continued unethical behavior.

This former client, Judy Sheehan, who I represented in 2006, is a criminal convicted of stalking and harassing her ex boyfriend. She is angry that I was able to avoid all jail time in her case, and that the court required her to go to counseling.

She has been creating false accounts to try to defame not only my character, but the character of everyone involved in her case (the police officer, the judge, the prosecutor, the arbitrator, and me).

Everyone associated with her wrongful conduct have been subject to false statements, and an all out campaign on the internet to slander and defame the name of everyone involved. The proof is in the links, which ripoffreport does not allow me to post, but which can be found through a search engine as follows:

Judge Deborah Andrews + topix + long beach

Detective Donald Wood + courthouseforum + 1044516

Arbitrator Sherry Honer + ripoffreport + 438

City Attorney Prosecutor Sharon Panian + topix.com financial-services
Sharon Panian + courthouseforum 1044516
Sharon Panian + latimesblogs + carona-sentence
Sharon Panian + latimesblogs + attorney + misconduct + maywood +police

Alleged Victim Dave Hadjes (client's ex boyfriend) + ripoffreport.com +0170117

Me, defense attorney Robert Miller + topix.com + long-beach-ca Robert Miller

Each person commenting on the various postings are separate identities and personalities that Judy Sheehan has created, just to make it appear that more than one person have commented. In truth, each personality belongs to one woman -- Judy Sheehan. For example, she said that had she known about me filing for divorce from my ex wife, she would not have hired me. Since I filed for divorce in 2007 (and the divorce is not yet final), and handled her (non-divorce) criminal cases in 2000, 2003, and 2006, how could that possibly have made a difference?

Unfortunately, this client is mentally unstable, and her priors show her true past history. It is inconceivable that the client could have so many people, who had never met, and who were all in different agencies, create a huge conspiracy against her.

It doesn't surprise me how defensive Mr. Miller is. He is an incompetent attorney and that is that. Mr. Miller DID NOT attend each and every meeting as he falsely states in his rebuttal. He sent his very young and very inexperienced associate Jessica to speak to the prosecutor instead of going in himself. She also attended a follow up hearing with me, not him. This was made evident by the 'internal notes' he provided me after I took him to arbritration.

Jessica sent an email to Mr. Miller with the results of HER meeting with the prosecutor. He did not meet with the Prosecutor regardless of what he has said here. Miller did indeed lie about the plea agreement, and did indeed threaten 14 years of jail time if I did not 'cop a plea' of NO CONTEST to the false and fraudulent charges against me.

He was taken to arbritration because of 'ineffective assistance of council'. Unfortunately the arbritrator who went to law school with Mr Miller sided with him after he repeatedly lied to her with regards to what he said he did in my case. However she did not reward him the entire amount of money he demanded.

Mr. Miller was hired to file a 'Motion to dismiss' and he stated to me that he would do this. However he did not file anything on my behalf. He instead told me he 'didn't have time'. Well he had 3 weeks. Apparently he was too involved in his own personal legal issues to do his job.

My case involved false Harassment charges by an ex-boyfriend who filed dozens of false police reports claiming among other things that I hacked into his corporate email account, attached GPS tracking devices to his truck, used computer voice changing equipment to sound like a man and leave messages, all proven to be false and fraudulent claims. The police checked his truck and found no tracking devises of any kind, they search my home and work and found no monoriting equipment whatsoever, there was an email provided by the false victim himself, from his work IT people that indicated his account was NEVER hacked into.

The Detective knew these claims were all false yet continued to make the claims on his numerous reports he filed with the police dept and the courts to get a judge to sign the search warrant. Apparently Judge Ong is a rubber stamp to these cops as he did not request any proof, as there was none.

I wasn't aware of these false claims until 6 months after the search because as the detective handed me the search warrant he quickly tore off the last 3 pages of this false narrative.

Mr. Miller even told me they had no probable cause to enter my home and agreed to file the 'Motion to dismiss' based on the facts that this was all being made up and had no base in fact. It was planted just like the gun and drugs were planted on Greggory Abbott the Fullerton teacher who was arrested last year but was actually set up by her estranged wife and her boyfriend. Their case is pending in an OC court. Trial is in April.

My ex-boyfriend, aided by his business partner, who is a Convicted Felon and was later arrested in Arkansas for 'Criminal Impersonation' (who then fled Arkansas leaving behind a slew of angry creditors, and two ex-wives) entered my home with the keys he still had after our breakup to plant an email address page used to set up a computer spoofing account, designed to fake caller ID. He falsely used my credit cards and also repeatedly sent himself email in his co-workers names, people I do not know nor have ever heard of and claimed it was me doing it. I never sent him any such thing. He claimed he changed his email account and I did not know it, He also claimed he had to change his phone number 25-30 times which was also a lie and Detective knew it but repeated this on his false reports.

His former wife who had filed TWO DV Restraining orders against him, was now coming to his aid and claiming she 'Made it all up'. She is an admitted liar. She filed these court documents under Penalty of Perjury, and filed false Police reports that resulted in having her husband (my ex) thown out of his own home by the Downey Police. So we should ask ourselves what else did she lie about?

Well lets see, she called Child Services on her ex-husband to get him to move out of his Studio apt because he was sleeping in the same bed with his two young children, she was molested by her father and sensitive to this situation, after being interviewed by Child services he had to move into living conditions that would accomadate two children, however she accused ME of making the call. This was a lie, I did not call, email or notify anyone of this.

She then sent her daughters Baseball Assoc president an email accusing her ex-husband of being a drug dealer (which he is) and of harassing young girls with sexual comments. Then called the detective up in 'hysterics' claiming it was me who sent the email. Again, I did not send anything to anyone, I have no idea who her Baseball president is or that he even exists. I live in a different city and have nothing to do with these people. The allegations were outragious and false.

The detective in the case was young and gullable and despite the fact that he knew his victim was lying about a number of things refused to believe me. He was angry that I would not speak to him as I was told not to my by previous attorney. And I dared to question his motives for defending a 'WIFE BEATING, DRUG DEALING, ILLEGAL GAMBLING, TAX EVADER. This set him off. He decided to turn the case over to prosecutor because I refused to talk to him. He was hitting on me, and making overtly sexual remarks and disturbing sexual inferrences and just creeped me out.

Once a DV case is turned over to prosecutors there is a 'No Drop policy' They don't drop the cases EVER! I found this out much later. I was being set up by a ventictive ex-boyfriend who threatened to kill me if 'cops showed up at his house'. He threatened my life and the Long Beach Police told me to file a Restraining order against him. I did, he retaliated and has been coming after me ever since. He was successful in his revenge and Mr. Miller failed to get to the truth. He claimed he 'didn't have time'!!!

The prosecutor told Mr. Miller's associate when SHE visited her, that she wasn't going to recommend 'jail time' but to 'HOLD JAIL TIME OVER HER HEAD TO GET HER TO COP A PLEA'. And Mr. Miller went along with it. He lied to me, rather than telling me the truth about what she really intended. I have his internal memo with this exact statment.

Mr. Miller is a liar! Had I know this, I would have fired him on the spot, requested a Public Defender and gone to trial. I have numerous witnesses and declarations from friends and family who knew I was NOT making calls or sending email to this fake victim and Miller knew it. But since he did not attend the MEETING with the prosecutor to reiterate this crucial information I was threatened with jail time.

Also during much of time I was falsely accused I was actually with family in the Arcadia hospital where my father was admitted after suffering a stroke. I was there more than home and there was undeniable proof of this. The calls were being made to the fake victim using a computer and the spooftell service that I was not a party to, the detective even told me NOTHING was found on my computer, Mr. Miller lied to me and tried to tell me there was.

the ex-boyfriend is now under investigation by the IRS for criminal fraud, they just popped his tax accountant, Sidney Binder, you can read all about it on the internet. It's just a matter of time before they get this liar.

To further reiterate his lies:
Mr. Miller did indeed file Bankruptcy and there WAS a law suite filed by Linda Gonzalez against him.

his Bankruptcy case #SA 05-10519-JB was Filed on January 27, 2005 total deliquent amount claimed: $1,256,086.57

his BK case is ongoing, and many motions have been filed to dismiss due to his missed payments. His debt. also includes NOT paying his California State Employment income taxes.


the Lawsuite for Legal Malpractice, Fraud and Breach of contract was filed by Linda Gonzalez for $100,000. Ms. Gonzalez is also a creditor to his bankruptcy claims.
Case #04CC03285 Filed May 19, 2004

Why Mr. Miller continues to lie about this is evidence of his unethical practice and clear evidence that he is a liar.

I think your readers should know about this attorney so they can make a judgement as to whether they want to hire him or not. I only wish I had know of his BK, Divorce and this Lawsuit. I surely would have gone elsewhere. I expect him to come after me with a lawsuit as this is the level this man stoops to rather than admit his mistakes. No doubt he will come back here with more lies.

Runamuck has written information that is comletely untrue.

Rather than send "flunkies" to speak to prosecutors, I handle every case where the client directly hires me personally. In this case, I handled Ms. Runamuck's case personally, including always communicating with her directly, and appearing in court with her every single time, without fail.

The information regarding bankruptcy is completely untrue, and even if true, has no relevance to the handling of this case. I have never filed for bankruptcy, and in fact, have an excellent credit history and rating.

The information regarding being sued for fraud, malpractice, and negligence, is completely and totally false. I enjoy a record few attorneys have - of never having been sued - not once, for malpractice, or fraud, or negligence (professional or otherwise).

The law does not allow me, or any defense attorney, to lie to a client about what the prosecutor says. Having said that, the prosecutors are of course not on the side of the client, but it is important to communicate to the client any relevant information that indicates the state of mind of the judge or the prosecution in the client's case. The facts in this case are much more important than the opinion of anyone involved.

This case involved a women who had been accused of severely harassing people using the internet and phone calls. Unfortunately, this woman, who is the author of the original complaint on this website, has a long history, with the victim in this case, and other men (including me) of becoming obsessed, and then stalking and harassing people, until law enforcement is involved. She then claims that she was victimized and that everyone, including the entire court system, judges, prosecutors, and of course, defense attorneys, are all somehow plotting a coordinated organized attack against her.

Nothing could be further from the truth. The efforts here and on other websites to slander and libel me are completely false. There can be no "force" to take a plea bargain. As the judge explains, in every single case, and as the written documents that Ms. Runamuck initialed and signed (six pages) in her case patiently explain, the court will not take a plea if there is any duress, force, or undue influence. The client in this case was explained that she could have a trial, at no cost to her, and bring in witnesses to fight the prosecution's case. She chose to plead guilty, and despite promises on other websites to appeal, never did withdraw her plea of guilty or change the fact that she voluntarily pled guilty for the crimes she committed.

Unfortunately, this website comment shows a complete disregard for the facts of the case, and Ms. Runamuck has decided to obtain "revenge", consistent with her past behavior, by harassing and posting falsehoods on the internet.

An independent arbitration panel of professionals found no wrongdoing on the part of me, as an attorney, or with the law firm, after this client filed a complaint.

It's amazing that the client claims that I, as her attorney, "took money and did NOTHING", since this client asked to be billed, and then never paid her bill for services, ever. This case was done for free, and was handled over the course of several months and many court appearances, and over 1,000 pages of documents, professionally, and with the highest level of conduct.