X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now
Ripoff Report | Sanford Pollack Review - Lincoln, Nebraska
Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #559991

Complaint Review: Sanford Pollack - Lincoln Nebraska

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Ripped Off — Lincoln Nebraska USA
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Sanford Pollack 1003 H Street, Lincoln Nebraska 68508 Lincoln, Nebraska United States of America

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Click here now..

Unprofessional, Standard of service is below that of an average educated attorney, He will not help you with a defense, His appeals have no merit, then filed in (Unpublished opinions) because he will not argue constitutional violations or arguments with merit on your appeal. He is a waste of good money! He will ruin your chances of success in the Nebraska legal system!!!!!!

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/25/2010 06:57 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/sanford-pollack/lincoln-nebraska-68508/sanford-pollack-pollack-ball-llc-unprofessional-services-are-below-standards-will-not-559991. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author
4Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#5 Consumer Comment

2022 Updated Lost cases

AUTHOR: Lincoln - (United States)

POSTED: Wednesday, March 09, 2022

State v. Mrza 926 NW 2d 79, 302 Neb. 931 - Neb: Supreme Court, 2019 - Google Scholar … Affirmed. Sanford J. Pollack, of Pollack & Ball, LLC, Lincoln, for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Kimberly A. Klein, Lincoln, for appellee … Court, “no merit to the assignments of error” Appeal Lost

State v. Mohammed Neb: Court of Appeals, 2018 - Google Scholar … Affirmed. Sanford J. Pollack, of Pollack & Ball, LLC, for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Kimberly A. Klein for appellee. RIEDMANN, BISHOP, and WELCH, Judges … Court, “Sexual advances and assaults on minor children are serious offenses.” Must not of been to serious! {Pollack Appeal Lost} Thanks to a Lancaster district court judge Mohammed was discharged from parole after only 4 years. Did Mohammed really think Pollack would win this appeal? Just put the money in your bank account call it good.

State v. Carter Neb: Court of Appeals, 2019 - Google Scholar … Judge. Affirmed. Sanford J. Pollack, of Pollack & Ball, LLC, for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Matthew Lewis, for appellee. MOORE … Court, “Finding no error in the district court's denial of the motion to transfer to juvenile court, we affirm.” Appeal Lost

State v. Moreno 947 NW 2d 330, 28 Neb. App. 581 - Neb: Court of Appeals, 2020 - Google Scholar … Affirmed. Sanford J. Pollack, Lincoln, of Pollack & Ball, LLC, for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Siobhan E. Duffy, Lincoln, for appellee … Court, ”….. sound basis for retaining Moreno's case in district court.” Appeal Lost

 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Consumer Comment

Sandford Pollack, Pollack & Ball

AUTHOR: Annoyed - (United States)

POSTED: Wednesday, December 13, 2017

IN RE INTEREST OF SEBASTIAN D., Neb: Court of Appeals, Filed April 26, 2016,  Sanford J. Pollack, of Pollack & Ball, L.L.C., for appellant.  Assignment of error is without merit. The juvenile court did not err in adjudicating Lillian-Jo as a child within the meaning of § 43-247(3)(a).  LOST

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Consumer Comment

Published Lost cases 2015 Pollack & Ball

AUTHOR: Consumer - (USA)

POSTED: Thursday, January 14, 2016

IN RE INTEREST OF GAVIN S.


23 Neb. App. 401 - Neb: Court of Appeals, 2015 - Sanford J. Pollack, of Pollack & Ball, L.L.C., for appellee Daniel S. Court finding that clear and convincing evidence shows that termination of Lacy's and Daniel's parental rights is in the children's best interests. Sanford Pollack waste of money time Lost.

 


 


IN RE INTEREST OF CASSANDRA B.


290 Neb. 619 - Neb: Supreme Court, 2015 - John C. Ball, of Pollack & Ball, LLC, for appellant. Joe Kelly. Prior court ordered that temporary legal and physical custody of both children should remain with Nebraska's Department of Health and Human Services. She appeals from an order of the separate juvenile court of Lancaster County prohibiting her from homeschooling Moira until further order of the court. John Ball waste of money time Lost.

 


These are only the published lost cases. Many Lost cases in Nebraska go unpublish hidden from the public.


Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Comment

More lost cases, what a waste of time and money!

AUTHOR: Lincoln Resident - (USA)

POSTED: Monday, July 02, 2012

State v. Dunkin, 283 Neb. 30 - Neb: Supreme Court, 2012-  Sanford Pollack Postconviction appeal.  Lost

IN RE INTEREST OF JAY S, Neb: Court of Appeals, 2011- Sanford Pollack Clients lose parental rights, control. Lost

IN RE INTEREST OF ELIZABETH S., 282 Neb. 1015 - Neb: Supreme Court 2012- Sanford Pollack Clients parental rights terminated and affirmed. Lost

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Author of original report

Incompetent Representation

AUTHOR: - (USA)

POSTED: Monday, October 17, 2011

Sanford J Pollack, Pollack @ Ball,  this is the type of services you will recieve. State v. Biggs, 2001 NE 90 Sanford Pollack refused to file an appeal for client.  Appeals Court rules client can't prove it.

 McCray v. Pollack, 2002 NE 181, Legal malpractise claim against Sanford Pollack. Court rules McCray failed to present expert testimony on his behalf. ( Fact, If a lawyer screws your case up, you will have a hard time finding another attorney to take the stand and say so.

 State v. Conrad, 2003 NE 61, Sanford Pollack represents Appellant on Appeal, his appeal has no merit. Lost

State v. Feldhacker, 11 Neb App 872, Sanford Pollack represents Appellant on Appeal, briefs don't comply with Neb. Supreme Court rules, his appeal has no merit. Lost

In re Interest of Sarah L, 758 N.W 2d 48, John Ball of Pollack @ Ball for Appeallant, appeal Lost.

Sanford Pollack is an expert at screwing clients cases up. Counties appoint this lawyer for that specific reason, to screw your case up, to argue meritless claims on appeal, even if you have claims that could win, he will lose. Most of his cases are keep in unpublished opinions. Do your research!

He and his law office make a living off the system. NOT by helping clients. He knows how to screw your case up and get away with it, he's had years of experience. Don't make the mistake of hiring this law office, your throwing money away, if your oppointed this attorney they appointed him to make sure you lose.

Search for additional reports

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.