Complaint Review: Screen Actors Guild - Los Angeles California
- Screen Actors Guild 5757 Wilshire Blvd., 7th Floor Los Angeles, California United States of America
- Phone: (323) 954-1600
- Web: www.sag.org
- Category: Modeling & Talent Agencies
Screen Actors Guild SAG Connived to Double Membership Dues! Los Angeles, California
*Author of original report: SAG RIPOFF SUPPORTER
*General Comment: If you had READ the Ballot materials.....
*General Comment: If you had READ the Ballot materials.....
*Author of original report: UNAPOLOGETIC RIPOFF EXCUSE!
*General Comment: You are Mis-Informing People
The staff of the Screen Actors Guild has conspired to DOUBLE the cost of annual dues for its members! This, without any notification or input from membership. To fund the high cost of the recent SAG-Aftra merger and other activities reminiscent of the GAO accounting office scandal, the elected leadership of SAG and their paid minions have worked behind closed doors to fleece the membership. Call or write them to protest this blatant grab for your wallet!
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/23/2012 09:22 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/screen-actors-guild/los-angeles-california-90036-3600/screen-actors-guild-sag-connived-to-double-membership-dues-los-angeles-california-872407. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:



#5 Author of original report
SAG RIPOFF SUPPORTER
AUTHOR: New York Actor - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, April 24, 2012
With 95% (NINETY-FIVE) of actors unemployed at any given time, you have the nerve to support doubling dues for non-working actors?? What, to support the dues reduction of the few who are lucky enough to work?? To pay for you to monitor and stamp out dissent like some soviet era relic? (I notice you are careful to couch your rebuttal with code term like "working" actors, knowing full well that non-working actors are the vast majority of the membership, a membership that, like me, was duped by SAG's failure to highlight the high cost to the vast majority of union members). How DARE you be so cavalier with other people's hard earned money! How DARE you distort the truth that the higher dues are necessary to maintain duplicate officers, staffs and the destructive little bureaucratic minions that eat up our dues. It is disgusting seeing your arrogant attitude, not only of entitlement to union membership money, but to arbitrarily sucking out more of it to suit your blatant bureaucratic greed!

#4 General Comment
If you had READ the Ballot materials.....
AUTHOR: Anne - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, April 24, 2012
If you had READ the Ballot materials, it was all there. You not only would have seen the Proposed Dues Structure, you would have seen that we included an Opposition Statement for you to read, which agreed with you. But the members of the Screen Actors Guild did NOT agree with you by a YES Vote of 82% - that is an historically high mandate by any standard. Your Work Dues will go down, and you won't have to join a second union. Given the shift of TV work increasingly to AFTRA over the last 4-6 years, most members who really want to work would eventually have join it, paying a second Initiation Fee. So all in all, you will be saving money with this merger. And FINALLY, all performers and broadcasters can now move forward together and devote their considerable energy to organizing more work for you and for all members.

#3 General Comment
If you had READ the Ballot materials.....
AUTHOR: Anne - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, April 24, 2012
If you had READ the Ballot materials, it was all there. You not only would have seen the Proposed Dues Structure, you would have seen that we included an Opposition Statement for you to read, which agreed with you. But the members of the Screen Actors Guild did NOT agree with you by a YES Vote of 82% - that is an historically high mandate by any standard. Your Work Dues will go down, and you won't have to join a second union. Given the shift of TV work increasingly to AFTRA over the last 4-6 years, most members who really want to work would eventually have join it, paying a second Initiation Fee. So all in all, you will be saving money with this merger. And FINALLY, all performers and broadcasters can now move forward together and devote their considerable energy to organizing more work for you and for all members.

#2 Author of original report
UNAPOLOGETIC RIPOFF EXCUSE!
AUTHOR: New York Actor - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Monday, April 23, 2012
If SAG had informed membership that dues were increasing by "almost" double (if it pleases you to use exact figures to refute the obvious greedy truth) this outrageous dues ripoff, and the merger, NEVER WOULD HAVE PASSED! That's why it was BURIED in the resolutions! SAG knew, after several futile failed attempts to pass this merger that it had to hide the cost to get it passed. I voted for it. And then I got my dues bill with the "hidden" cost finally revealed. OUTRAGEOUS AND DECEPTIVE!!

#1 General Comment
You are Mis-Informing People
AUTHOR: Anne - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Monday, April 23, 2012
The recent merger of SAG & AFTRA to form SAG-AFTRA was VOTED on by the membership of both unions...and it was approved by 82% and 86% of the members respectively. The Base Dues for former SAG members went from $116 to $198 per year (after no increase in many years). Working Dues went DOWN for almost all SAG members. Complete information on the new Dues Structure was provided to all members in their ballot package, online and explained at Informational Meetings all over the country. So you are incorrect in your math and in your entire characterization.


Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.