Suski Used Cars of Flint; Suski Used Cars; Fenton; Misrepresented Auto Check said 1 owner no accident clean record; had front end collison with police report; gave fake auto check; didn't take delivery but would not give keys or title back to our trade; made us pay $2300 ransom to get our vehicle back; turned into State of Michigan Attorney General as Complaint and within 1/2 day got call saying they had not heard of anything as bad since the 70's or 80's, case is being filed against them by the Attorney General's Office. Fenton Michigan

 Today Suski Used Cars has stated they are going to refund the full $24,000 paid on account for the vehicle we were to purchase bud did not take delivery on.  During a tent sale an outside firm was brought in and there was it appears a misunderstanding on representation of the auto check for the vehicle we were going to purchase. The salesman involved in the transaction we are assured no longer works for them and told the others directly involved at time were temporary contracted staff and not direct employees of Suski Used Cars. The evening the sale transaction was initiated, no management staff working directly for Suski that we know of was present.   As a result of internal review from Suski Management and Owners the facts were reviewed and Suski Management and Owners have stated they are sending us a full check for the full $24,000 as a result.  We are pleased that this has worked out and we  got our trade back and our funds of $24,000 are soon to be returned to us.  We do believe that Suski Used Cars is trying to do right by us in returning the funds, corrected the cause of the original misunderstanding and we wish them no ill will. 

Let us clarify our reviews of Suski Used Cars are our personal beliefs and opinion to best we can determine  in addition with documentation we mention herewith provable, we have posted to our best personal belief as honest as possible.  While we can only assume the level of responsibility of the parties involved, we do not really know who directed who to do all that occured.  We do not have a vehicle from them, have our own vehicle back and they now have $24,000 of our funds (We paid $24,000 deposit, they gave us back $21,700 after deducting $2300 charge for us to get our own vehicle back and put stop payment on $21,700 check to us).  We have received nothing in return for that $24,000.00 from Suski Used Cars.  The issue of the potential in our opinion tax fraud as said our vehicle being traded for $1,000 and one purchasing was to be $24,000 believe and actually not so is up to the State to decide if our opinion is correct or not about tax evasion as we are not experts on tax issues.

We contacted Tony Deck at Suski,, Sales Manager, today and stated he knew nothing about the Stop Payment, he was believable.  Mr. Deck indicated he got the most blame from us and indicated it seems to us others higher up were more responsible.  We can only provide our opinions of what happened by actions, and all but first day he was involved with us the most.  We only posted in our opinion all that we could and have no idea if others were involved as well behind the scenes to what we (husband and I) agree is our  personal belief occurred. But bottom line is would not give our vehicle back and made us pay to get it back and not be forced in our opinion to take the vehicle that had undisclosed front end damage on auto check misrepresented.  For  r. Deck I want to clarify though had no part of the auto check misrepresentation as was not there until we returned 2 days later to pick up vehicle and refused delivery as demanded auto check and Mr. Deck did supply accurate one we based refusal of  delivery for vehicle on (only person).  Others issues are as stated in previous posts as our best opinion letters of doucmentation from salesman, from Sales Manager authorizing us to use the refused not  accepted delivery on  vehicle as a loaner and indicating we had not accepted delivery; letter from Operations Manager releasing us from the deal and responsibility and giving us our own vehicle back for $2300 deducted from $24,000 refund, then a stop payment on $21,700 (difference between $24,000 w3e paid and $2300 they charged us to get our own vehicle back, keys.   The owner aware as far as we know is the one  owner met, was Ed Usewick and he was the person overseeing this it appeared to us and we can only  assume the most responsible party for what happened to us.  We cannot determine why the stop payment as have signed letter by Operations Manager the original deal was voided and giving us our potential trade back to us and all parties signed off.

  The Operations Manager looked over the loaner we brought back extensively before giving us our own vehicle back so we do not know problem, except Tony Deck mentioned very upset over us posting bad review on internet (we assume this one).   People there involved and the degree of responsiblity that brought this all about is the best we can determine for each person in our personal opinion, but the dealership without doubt has our funds of  $24,000 as we have no vehicle from them and have a vehicle back they claim to be worth $1,000 on deal papers but in our opinion it is tax fraud to get price down to get us to take vehicle but let the State decide if what they did was legal or not. All posts are to the best of our belief in our  opinion.  But we are out $24,000.  Anyone who has issue with Suski the same or they feel in their opinion not right should contact the State of Michigan, Attorney General's Office and file complaint (forms on line).

In previous report we reported that we gave Suski Used Cars $24,000 and our trade for a vehicle, before taking delivery we found out 3 of their staff working at the dealership lied about The Auto Check being one owner, no accidents but demanded the report before taking delivery.  Then when said we didn't want it to sum it up they deducted $2300 of our $24,000 and gave us check for $21,700 saying it was for cancelling the deal, etc.. 

Well we deposited the check July 5th written on Third World Bank and Suski Used Cars put a stop payment on the refund of our funds check.  Do not do business with this company.  Both the Fenton and Flint locations ere involved in this.

Deal was ongoing at Fenton and the Flint location, Operations Manager is one who gave us the refund check and later put stop payment on it after signing releases.  We are now out $24,000.