The Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission, Agacinski, Vella, McGlinn Devils of the Michigan Court Detroit Michigan

While representing Case No. GC 09 1653 in the Michigan 46th District Court, he James G. Schmier (P70825) did nothing. He didnt know what he was doing but didnt know what to do. He worked

for the defense attorneys Jeanne Barron and Jeffrey Vollmer NOT plaintiff his client. He allowed an attached counter claim that should have been prevented if he had just appeared for hearing and knew what to do.  His invoice charging services rendered states client was late for deposition.  He, however was not late for hearing.  He just didnt show up.   He allowed an attached counter claim.  A counter claim must attach to the original lawsuit immediately after filing. He, Schmier filed a lawsuit for plaintiff and ex-client 04/2009 in the Michigan 46th District Court.

A counter claim attached to it September 2009, months late. This refutes his advertising. He is not aggressive. Hes an experienced lawyer will fight for you. He, additionally could not account for funds used/unused. After nine months of doing absolutely nothing, he said this case is hard.  He said that and petitioned the court to withdraw as counsel.  He did not respond to motion and did not appear for hearing; this is notated on transcript. He confessed this to the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission but the transcript proved his guilt. He

confessed inept but put on top of it a really big lie. He said he entered the wrong date into his computer. I admit I failed to attend meeting. . . . I made a mistake in entering it in my computer calendar. The hearing was 09/30/2009. I mistakenly entered in my computer calendar for 10/30/2009. Hummmmm Really!!! He did this too, he presented the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission a bogus retainer fee agreement. He did. Yes he did.

According to Schmier, he sent (2) copies of the retainer fee to client via US Mail but neither was returned to him. Laugh. Go ahead and laugh. Laugh, laugh, laugh.  Hummmm stupid, pure stupidity. The client NEVER received either of the two retainer fee agreements because he (Schmier) NEVER prepared/submitted them. He LIED. The subject matter concerning a retainer fee agreement between Schmier and client NEVER ever surfaced.

After nine months of doing nothing, he (Schmier) said this case is hard and petitioned the court to withdraw but exposed his NEGLECT and Civil Conspiracy. Client accompanied by a Birmingham, Michigan

police officer retrieved all case files from Schmier at his Birmingham, MI office (2222 Attard St.) December 2009. This was before the January 2010 court date to hear argument to release him as counsel. He (Schmier) NEVER had conversations with the Birmingham, MI police officer concerning escorted client. He said he did. He LIED. The Birmingham, MI police officer denies his allegation. I did not tell him that and I did not write that in my police report. I was leaving right behind you [ex-client]. He, therefore, has compromised and damaged a Birmingham, Michigan police officers reputation and

ex-client. He went that far for Attorney Jeanne V. Barron, Raftery, Janeczek & Hoelscher/Farmington Hills, MI (white female woman lawyer looks like a man). He went that far for Attorney Jeffrey L. Vollmer (Wegner & Associates, P.C/Saint Clair Shores, MI). They surrendered him something and or promised him something (Jeanne Barron and Jeffrey Vollmer, something he wanted it real bad.

Evidence of the habit of a person or of the routine practice of an organization, whether corroborated or not and regardless of the presence of eyewitness is relevant to prove that the conduct of the person or organization on a particular occassion was in conformity with the habitor routine practice (Reading from the Michigan Rules of evidence 404).

He, attorney James G. Schmier made habit of stating inaccurate information. He (Schmier) is a No. 1 Loser and Master Liar. He lies all over the map. How he ever attained a Michigan Law License is yet a mystery. He, no doubt embarasses the Michigan State Bar. Oh! By the way, he didnt show up in court to represent himself (01/11/2010). He petitioned the court to withdraw (Case No. GC 09 1653) but did not/could not show his face in court. He wasnt feeling well. Hummmm, Really!!!.     

The Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission was/is non-helpful, blogs and complaint boards are., this one especially. The attorney, James G. Schmier filed a lawsuit in the Oakland County Circuit Court, Case No. 2011-123947-CZ. Those complaint boards hurt his reputation, APPARENTLY. Case was disposed. His hands are not clean. He could not approach the court with unclean hands. See Doctrine of Unclean Hands. His claim also approached the court with unclean hands and improper venue. LOL

The complaint, Case No. 2011-123947-CZ stated more non-truths than actual truths. Judge William J.

Richards in the Michigan 46th District Court released him as counsel (Case No. GC 09 1653) 01/11/2010 not 07/20/2010 as stated in the 2011-123947-C complaint. The Michigan 46th District Court Clerk Wanda Frost on 12/22/2009 forwarded to all parties a Notice of Hearing that was scheduled 1/11/2010. Judge William J. Richards on 01/11/2010 granted the petition, counsel (James G. Schmier) to withdraw. The complaint, 2011-123947-CZ said also that defendant filed a complaint against him with the State Bar of Michigan. He lied.

Defendant filed a complaint against him (Schmier) with the Attorney Grievance Commission (Detroit, MI) NOT the State Bar in Lansing, MI. Proof of this appeared in the complaint, 2011-123947-CZ correspondence submitted by Ruth Ann Stevens who is associated with the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission. LOL The Michigan Attorney Grievance Commisison investigates attorneys ethics and misconduct not the Michigan State Bar [Lansing, MI] LOL. He, Schmier filed a formal complaint in the Oakland County Circuit Court but the Attorney Grievance Commission is

located is in Wayne County [Michigan] NOT Oakland County [Michigan] and the State Bar is located in Ingham County [Michigan] not Oakland County [Michigan]. Laugh. Go ahead and laugh. Laugh, laugh, laugh. His claim, case no. 2011-123947-CZ was frivolous and abuses the law system. Also, he approached the court with unclean hands. He, the attorney James G, Schmier initiated a

defamation lawsuit against an ex-client but in it defames ex-client and  defendant. LOL Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or other acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, scheme, plan, or system in doing an act, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident when the same is material, whether such other crimes,

 rongs, or acts are contemporaneous with, or prior or subsequent to the conduct at issue in the case (Reading from the Michigan Rules of Evidence 404 (b) (1). Following that leader Jeanne Vallez Barron leads nowhere. 

Having dealt with Steven Vella and the AGC on multiple occasions, only to find the results of my efforts to be a "waste of time", I find myself along with many others questioning why we have this worthless organization and while we are at it, the Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission also.

These Judicial Corruption organizations need to be eliminated immediately and replace by "Private Enterprise" companies that understand business and fair answers.

I have filed many complaints with the AGC and JTC, that were "Books in Size" with more documentation and proof than you care to think about, with always the same results....."We found no wrongdoing". What a joke, these people could care less..believe me. Fat salarys.....with no monitoring or responsibility for the end result.(((Redacted))) and (((Redacted))) it will show you what is really going on!

Gard Dog

CLICK here to see why Rip-off Report, as a matter of policy, deleted either a phone number, link or e-mail address from this Report.