Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #690792

Complaint Review: Auto Owners Insurance - Lansing Michigan

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Ltaskybound — jackson Michigan United States of America
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Auto Owners Insurance 6101 Anacapri Blvd Lansing, Michigan United States of America

Auto Owners Insurance Denied claim for water leak, had clause to protect them on leak older then 2 weeks Lansing, Michigan

*Consumer Comment: I agree with what you say

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

On Oct 22,2010 I visited my Insurance agent to see about filing a claim for water damage due to a pipe breaking in my bathroom. I learned I had a $1,000.00 deductible, being unemployed I advised my agent I could not afford it so we both agreed I should not open the claim until I save up enough money to cover the deductible. He did document on my account that I inquired about filing the claim and why we did not open it at that time.

I saved the money and contacted my agent early February of 2011 (3.5 months later) to open the claim. I had a contractor out to supply the estimate as requested by the insurance company. I was contacted the following day by an adjuster who met with the contractor and myself to inspect the damages.

The adjuster was very rude, arrogant and cocky. He spent less then 5 minutes looking at damage, leaned against my kitchen counter and with a rude smirk on his face he said "I am denying your claim". I asked him why?, he became even more disrespectful towards me and the contractor and said because the leak is older then 2 weeks and we have a clause in your contract to protect the insurance company.

I am now stuck with a floor that is rotted and the signs of black mold are apparent from the water damage. I asked the adjuster and his manager "what am I suppose to do now?", their response was "Dont use your bathroom". I asked what would happen if me or one of my friends were to get hurt on the unstable floor, I was advised that they would not cover anything that may happen because I now have a "pre existing condition" and its my negligence to not repair it.

I find it absurd that I did the responsible thing as a homeowner by waiting to save the needed money to cover the deductible before filing my claim and now I am being excluded for coverage because the damage is older then 2 weeks. I feel I am being treated unfairly by my insurance provider which I have put faith in and paid my premiums to faithfully. I also was informed that I have the best homeowners coverage you can purchase from Auto owners, kind of scary to think what their worst coverage is.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 02/04/2011 11:06 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/auto-owners-insurance/lansing-michigan-48917/auto-owners-insurance-denied-claim-for-water-leak-had-clause-to-protect-them-on-leak-old-690792. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#1 Consumer Comment

I agree with what you say

AUTHOR: Corporate responsability - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Wednesday, July 06, 2011

Auto-Owners has all sorts of legal escapes in their policies.  I don't recommend that anyone work with these crooks.  I've seen similar situations where they stick you with not covering what should be normally covered.  Please post an update so we can get rip-off report to #1 on google's search engine. 

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now