Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #214358

Complaint Review: Old National Bank - Evansville Indiana

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Vincennes Indiana
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Old National Bank oldnational.com Evansville, Indiana U.S.A.

Old National Bank ripoff dishonest late posting ATM withdrawals then charging $33 NSF Evansville Indiana

*Consumer Suggestion: Not At Fault

*Consumer Suggestion: The bank is not at fault here

*Consumer Comment: Interesting

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I withdrew cash from an Old National Bank ATM on Monday at 5:00 p.m. and again at 6:00 p.m. That night, checks were posted to my account but not the ATM withdrawals. They were never posted the next day either, when clearly I had a positive balance. On Tuesday night/Wednesday morning, more checks were posted to my account and one of them caused my account to be overdrawn. It was only then that they posted the ATM withdrawals from Monday to my account and proceeded to charge me $33.00 each for Non-Sufficient Funds when clearly there were funds in my account at the time. I contacted the bank and was told by everyone that this is how they do business and they were not going to refund the $66.00 in fees. If this is not creative stealing by the bank, please tell me what it is. I feel a Class-Action Lawsuit would be in order to put the brakes on these out of control banks. The bank lobbyists have to go. The laws must change. Its the rich "ripping-off" the poor.

Re
Vincennes, Indiana
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/05/2006 11:45 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/old-national-bank/evansville-indiana-47591/old-national-bank-ripoff-dishonest-late-posting-atm-withdrawals-then-charging-33-nsf-evan-214358. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
3Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#3 Consumer Suggestion

Not At Fault

AUTHOR: Debbie - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, February 14, 2008

I agree with Cody, this isn't really the bank's fault. If you check your balance online, be sure to compare it to your bank register. Sometimes if you write a check to an individual it doesn't "hit" your bank right away as they may hold it, it goes to another banking facility for processing, then to your bank. A common occurance is that a lot of people do not use check registers either paper or on their computers. This is good banking practice...that way you know that you don't have enough money to withdraw....the ONLY complaint I have against ATM's though is that if you do not have enough money in your account, it still lets you have money....many years ago when I received my first ATM card, this was not allowed. Times have changed as I am sure that the banks have seen this as a way to collect fees....

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Suggestion

The bank is not at fault here

AUTHOR: Cody - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, October 05, 2006

I agree that some of the banks do try to catch some people with this stuff, they make tons of money in NFS charges, however, this is noone's fault but your own and could easily be avoided.

It is irrelevant when they post a withdrawal or check to your account. You made the cash w/ drawals and you wrote the checks. You should always have enough cash in the bank to cover every single debit or check YOU have written, at all times.

You clearly stated some checks cleared, then more checks cleared, over drawing your account, then the debits posted.

You withdrew/wrote more $$ in checks than what you had in the bank, how is that the banks fault??

Sorry, but I am very confused here.

In order to avoid this in the future, follow the guide lines listed below.

Example 1:
Acct. Balance: $500.00
Checks Written: $280.00
Debit/Cash W/draw: $100.00
Result: You have sufficient funds to cover.

Example 2:
Acct. Balance: $500.00
Checks Written: $400.00
Debit/Cash W/draw: $180.00
Result: You are overdrawn, expect a service fee!

It is simple math, really.

Cody

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Consumer Comment

Interesting

AUTHOR: Cory - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, October 05, 2006

If there's money in your account, it probably shouldn't matter when the they "hit" your account, be it Monday night or Tuesdaday night or even Wed. night. You said on Tuesday night/Wednesday morning MORE checks, you had written, were posted to your account. Do I figure that you got an online or onphone balance, assuming your ATM withdrawls had been posted and then wrote some checks based on that balance. I guess your thinking is they manipulated their system to make everything "hit" at the same time thereby causing your NSF's. Or, is there some other way of looking at it? The reason I ask is that the usual post is about the order in which the checks are posted. Largest to smallest This is the first time I've read about something like this.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now