X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1451388

Complaint Review: David Constantino - St. Petersburg FL

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Sean — United States
  • David Constantino 535 Central Ave St. Petersburg, FL United States

David Constantino KEL Lawfirm LawyerASAP Rahdert & Mortimer, PLLC KEL LawfirmLawyerASAPRahdert & Mortimer, PLLC KEL LawfirmLawyerASAPRahdert & Mortimer, PLLC David accepted my case then positioned himself to abandon the case St. Petersburg Florida

*Author of original report: Removal

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I filed against Freight Center, in 2015, while David worked for KEL Attorneys, which later became Lawyer ASAP.  David currently works at .  (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER)))  

(((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER)))  (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER)))  (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER)))  (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER))) (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER)))  

(((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER))) (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER))) (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER))) Not sure what kind of transparency Florida law has, but one would think a motion to withdraw as a lawyer would be informed to the client.

I should have filed a grievance against David and forced him to face the bar association. (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER))) (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER)))  

(((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER))) (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER)))  

SPECIFIC INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT WAS FOUND TO BE FALSE/DEFAMATORY BY A COURT. OUT OF RESPECT FOR THE JUDICIAL PROCESS, THE SPECIFIC INFORMATION THAT WAS FOUND FALSE/DEFAMATORY BY THE COURT HAS BEEN (((REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER)))

 

Editor’s Comment: March 2, 2021 -.  Ripoff Report believes in transparency and the more information the better.  In this instance, there has been court action regarding this subject Report.  We believe it important to note that not all Court Orders are alike.  Many court orders are absolutely legitimate and we make no representations about this court order situation However, we want our users to be aware that sometimes courts enter orders based upon default which typically means that the defendant didn’t show up.  Sometimes a defendant won’t show up because they didn’t even get notice of the case proceedings in the first place and other times defendants may not show up because they don’t necessarily have the knowledge and/or the financial resources to fight.  Still, in other instances, a defendant may simply appear only to stipulate (settle) the case by agreeing to stipulate to a court order because they are being bullied by the plaintiff and whether what they said was true or not, they just want the matter to go away so they can move on with life and make the plaintiff go away.  Again, we make no representations about this particular court order situation.  We are simply providing you with additional information so that you may be more informed in general and, coupled with any additional research you feel is necessary, may make your own informed decision regarding the validity of this Report (or anything that may be left of it after redaction).  As always, we encourage our readers to do their homework and not just rely on one single source for information.

The Court Order dated February 19, 2021 relating to David Constantino v. Sean Heupel, from the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit in Pinellas County, Florida, Case No. 2020-CA-003175 that caused the redaction can be seen here: (https://www.scribd.com/document/496686587/David-Constantino-v-Sean-Heupel-Court-Order).

If you are interested in how a post on Ripoff Report was involved in this matter, you can review the case docket indicating where the Initial Compliant was filed on July 2, 2020 here: (https://ccmspa.pinellascounty.org/PublicAccess/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=18558607)

As of February 19, 2021, it appears that the underlying case is not yet concluded per the court docket, wherein twenty-four documents have been filed, that may be accessed at Anoka County Online (https://ccmspa.pinellascounty.org/PublicAccess/Search.aspx?ID=300&NodeID=11000,11100,23001,11101,11102,11103,11104,11105,11106,11107,11108,11114,11109,23002,23003,11110,11111,11112,11113,11200,11201,11202,11203,11204,11205,11206,11207,11208,23004,11209,11210,11300,11301,11302,11303,11304,11305,11400,11410,11411,11412,11450,11451,11452,11453,11600,11601,11602,11603,11604,12000,12100,12101,12102,12103,12104,12105,12106,12107,12108,12109,12110,12111,12113,12112,12114,12200,12201,12202,12203,12204,12205,12206,12207,12208,12209,12300,12310,12311,12312,12320,12321,12322,12400,14000,14100,14200,14300,14400,14500,14600,13000,13100,13200&NodeDesc=Pinellas County)Please consider reviewing the entire legal file to gain better understandings of the positions of the parties and how matters are resolved.  We may not update this posting further with any new information and you should seek additional and updated information out on your own if you want to learn more and have a more complete picture.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 07/12/2018 08:15 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/report/david-constantino/st-petersburg-fl-kel-lawfirm-1451388. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author
0Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#1 Author of original report

Removal

AUTHOR: Sean - (United States)

POSTED: Friday, October 05, 2018

I am writing to ask those reading to disregard this post.  It has parts that have not been properly verified and edited to prevent confusion/misinterpretation, prior to posting, and as a whole document/report, this should be disregarded as an unreliable report.  It is reminded that this is a peer review website to post grievances and opinions of businesses and is not considered any sort of authority (similar to Yelp, Google or Yellowpages reviews).

Respond to this report!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now